The Interplay of Desire and Will in Choice: Navigating the Inner Compass

The interplay of desire and will forms the very core of human choice, a dynamic tension explored by philosophers for millennia. While desire represents our fundamental inclinations, urges, and appetites, will embodies the rational faculty to deliberate, choose, and direct action. Understanding how these forces interact within the Mind is crucial for comprehending human agency and moral responsibility, shaping the very essence of Man. This article delves into this profound relationship, drawing insights from the enduring wisdom found in the Great Books of the Western World.

Desire's Primal Whisper: The Pull of Inclination

Before we can speak of choice, we must acknowledge the insistent voice of desire. It is the engine of our being, the initial spark that propels us towards or away from things. From the most basic physiological needs—hunger, thirst, comfort—to complex aspirations like love, recognition, or knowledge, desire is a fundamental aspect of human existence.

  • From Appetites to Aspirations

Ancient Greek thinkers, particularly Plato in his Republic, conceptualized desire as one of the soul's three parts: the appetitive. This part, driven by bodily needs and pleasures, often pulls us towards immediate gratification. Aristotle, too, recognized the role of orexis (appetite or desire) in motivating action, noting that we desire that which appears good to us. This isn't inherently negative; desire for nourishment keeps us alive, and desire for knowledge fuels progress. However, without a guiding hand, unchecked desires can lead us astray, making us slaves to our impulses rather than masters of our own lives. The challenge, then, lies not in eradicating desire, but in understanding its nature and its proper place within the human psyche.

The Ascendancy of Will: Reason's Guiding Hand

If desire is the raw fuel, will is the steering mechanism. The will represents our capacity for conscious, deliberate choice—the power to say "yes" or "no" to the promptings of desire, to postpone gratification, or to pursue a difficult path for a greater good. It is the faculty that allows us to act not merely from impulse, but from reasoned judgment and principle.

  • The Deliberate Path

Philosophers like Augustine wrestled profoundly with the concept of free will, particularly in the context of moral choice and sin. He understood the will as the mind's power to direct itself. Later, Thomas Aquinas, building on Aristotle, emphasized the intellect's role in presenting options to the will, which then makes the final determination. For Aquinas, the will is a rational appetite, capable of choosing based on what the intellect perceives as good. Immanuel Kant further elevated the will, positing the "good will" as the only thing unconditionally good. For Kant, moral actions are those performed out of duty, guided by the will's adherence to universal moral laws, rather than by inclination or desire. This highlights the will's capacity for self-legislation and its crucial role in ethical living.

The Mind as the Arena: Where Forces Converge

The true drama of human choice unfolds within the Mind. It is here that the urgent calls of desire meet the reasoned deliberation of the will. The mind doesn't merely house these faculties; it is the stage where their interaction is negotiated, where intentions are formed, and where the ultimate direction of our actions is determined.

(Image: A classical allegorical painting depicting a struggle between two figures. One figure, perhaps representing Desire, is draped in flowing, vivid red cloth, reaching impulsively towards a forbidden fruit or pleasure, eyes wide with longing. The other figure, representing Will, stands firm and upright, clad in stoic blue or grey, holding a compass or scales, with a calm, resolute gaze directed towards a distant, elevated path. Behind them, a subtle, ethereal light emanates from an open book or scroll, symbolizing knowledge or reason, illuminating the path forward but leaving the immediate choice in dynamic tension between the two figures. The background is a blend of shadowed indulgence and a brighter, more challenging ascent.)

  • The Human Predicament

This internal dynamic defines the human predicament. Are we primarily driven by our passions, with reason merely serving as a tool to achieve what we desire, as David Hume famously suggested ("Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions")? Or does our capacity for rational will allow us to transcend our inclinations and act according to higher principles, as Kant argued? The ongoing tension between these views underscores the complexity of human Man. Our ability to reflect on our desires, to weigh consequences, and to choose a course of action that aligns with our values, even when it’s difficult, is what truly sets us apart. It is through this interplay that we not only make choices but also become who we are.

Philosophical Perspectives on Desire and Will

Different philosophical traditions have offered unique insights into this fundamental relationship:

Philosopher/Tradition View on Desire View on Will Interplay in Choice
Plato Appetitive part of the soul; often irrational and needs control. Rational part of the soul; guides and controls desires. Reason (Will) should rule the appetites (Desire) for a harmonious soul.
Aristotle Natural appetite (orexis) for perceived good; can be rational or irrational. Rational appetite; capacity for deliberation and voluntary action. Practical wisdom guides the will to choose virtuous actions, balancing desires with reason.
Augustine Can be disordered or rightly ordered towards God. Free choice of the mind; central to moral responsibility and sin. The will, when corrupted, chooses lower desires over higher goods.
Aquinas Sensory appetite; tends towards sensible good. Rational appetite; follows the intellect's judgment of the good. The intellect presents options to the will, which then makes a free choice based on reason.
Hume Passions are primary motivators; reason is subordinate. Not a distinct faculty; actions are determined by strongest desires. Reason serves the passions, finding means to achieve desired ends.
Kant Inclinations; can be morally neutral or opposed to duty. The faculty of acting according to the conception of laws; the source of moral worth. A good will acts out of duty, overcoming inclinations to follow universal moral law.

Conclusion: Crafting the Self Through Choice

The dance between desire and will is not a static philosophical problem but a lived experience for every Man. It is the constant negotiation between what we want and what we ought to do, between immediate gratification and long-term well-being, between instinct and principle. Understanding this dynamic is not merely an academic exercise; it is fundamental to self-awareness, personal growth, and ethical living. By consciously engaging our will, by reflecting on our desires, and by allowing our Mind to be the thoughtful arbiter, we actively participate in the ongoing project of crafting ourselves, one choice at a time. The lessons from the Great Books remind us that this journey, though challenging, is the very essence of what it means to be human.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Plato's Theory of the Soul - Appetites, Spirit, Reason"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Kant on Duty and the Good Will Explained"

Share this post