The Enduring Idea of Temperance in Politics
In the bustling arena of modern politics, where grand pronouncements and ideological fervor often dominate, the quiet idea of temperance might seem like a relic of a bygone era. Yet, as the great thinkers of the Western tradition have long understood, temperance is not merely a personal virtue but a foundational pillar for stable and just government. This article explores the philosophical underpinnings of temperance in the political sphere, drawing insights from foundational texts to illuminate its enduring relevance. Far from a call for asceticism, temperance in politics signifies self-mastery, moderation, and a prudent restraint essential for effective leadership and the well-being of the polis.
Defining Temperance: Beyond Mere Abstinence
At its core, the idea of temperance (Greek: sophrosyne) is often misunderstood as simply abstinence or self-denial. While it certainly encompasses these aspects, its philosophical depth, particularly as articulated by Plato and Aristotle, reveals a far richer concept.
- Plato's Harmony: In Plato's Republic, temperance is presented as a kind of harmony or agreement. It is the orderly arrangement of the parts of the soul, where reason rules over appetite and spirit. When this internal harmony is achieved, the individual possesses temperance. Crucially, Plato extends this idea to the state, arguing that a temperate government is one where the different classes (rulers, auxiliaries, producers) agree on who should rule, creating a unified and stable society. It is not about suppressing desires entirely, but about ordering them according to reason for the greater good.
- Aristotle's Golden Mean: Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, positions temperance as a mean between two extremes – the vice of insensibility (deficiency) and the vice of self-indulgence (excess). It is the disposition to feel and act in the right way, at the right time, towards the right objects, and with the right motive. For Aristotle, temperance is intrinsically linked to practical wisdom (phronesis), allowing one to discern the appropriate measure in all things.
In essence, temperance is the virtue of self-control and moderation, a rational command over desires and impulses that prevents excess and promotes balance.
Temperance in the Architecture of Government
How does this individual virtue translate into the complex machinery of government? The great books suggest that temperance is vital for both the rulers and the ruled.
For Rulers and Statesmen: The Virtue of Prudent Restraint
A temperate leader is one who is not swayed by personal ambition, greed, or fleeting passions.
Characteristics of Temperate Governance:
| Aspect of Governance | Temperate Approach | Intemperate Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Decision-Making | Guided by reason, long-term foresight, and public good. | Driven by impulse, short-term gain, or personal interest. |
| Use of Power | Exercised with restraint, accountability, and justice. | Abused for personal enrichment or tyrannical control. |
| Fiscal Policy | Prudent management of resources, avoiding extravagance. | Reckless spending, unsustainable debt, corruption. |
| Foreign Policy | Measured diplomacy, avoiding unnecessary aggression. | Belligerence, expansionism, disregard for international norms. |
| Public Discourse | Calm, rational debate, seeking common ground. | Inflammatory rhetoric, demagoguery, polarization. |
Plato explicitly warns against rulers who lack temperance, portraying them as prone to tyranny, where the state is enslaved by the unchecked desires of a single individual or a ruling faction. An intemperate government is unstable, prone to corruption, and ultimately self-destructive, as its excesses breed discontent and rebellion.
For Citizens: The Foundation of a Stable Polis
The idea of temperance is not solely for those in power; it is also a fundamental virtue for the citizenry. A healthy government relies on citizens who can moderate their own desires and demands for the collective good.
- Civic Harmony: When citizens are temperate, they are less prone to factionalism driven by insatiable desires for wealth, power, or pleasure. They can prioritize the common good over narrow self-interest.
- Respect for Law: Temperate citizens are more likely to respect and abide by the laws, understanding that these are necessary for social order, even when they impose personal restrictions.
- Resistance to Demagoguery: A temperate populace is less susceptible to the siren call of demagogues who promise unlimited gratification or scapegoat others to fuel collective passions.
Aristotle believed that a well-ordered government requires a virtuous citizenry, and temperance is a primary virtue that fosters civic responsibility and stability.
(Image: A classical Greek statue of a serene, cloaked figure, possibly Sophrosyne or a philosopher, with one hand gently resting over their heart, symbolizing inner calm and self-control. The figure's gaze is steady and thoughtful, not stern, suggesting a balanced and harmonious disposition rather than rigid denial.)
Virtue and Vice: The Political Spectrum of Self-Control
The political landscape is often a battleground between the forces of virtue and vice. Temperance stands in stark contrast to its political antitheses:
- Excess (Vice of Self-Indulgence): Manifests as unbridled ambition, corruption, lavish spending of public funds, reckless policies, and a disregard for long-term consequences in pursuit of immediate gratification or power. This leads to instability and injustice.
- Deficiency (Vice of Insensibility/Apathy): While less commonly discussed in political temperance, it could manifest as an extreme lack of will, a refusal to act decisively even when necessary, or an inability to feel empathy for the suffering of the populace, leading to governmental paralysis or neglect. However, the greater political danger historically has been excess.
The wise political leader, therefore, navigates a path that avoids both the tyranny of overreach and the paralysis of inaction, guided by the temperate mean.
The Enduring Relevance in Modern Government
Even in our complex, pluralistic societies, the ancient idea of temperance remains critically important. The challenges of climate change, economic inequality, and social division often stem from collective intemperance – an unwillingness to moderate consumption, share resources equitably, or engage in respectful dialogue.
- Sustainable Governance: Temperance calls for policies that prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term economic booms, advocating for responsible resource management and fiscal prudence.
- Democratic Stability: It encourages citizens to engage in political discourse with moderation, seeking understanding rather than absolute victory, and to hold leaders accountable for their actions, not just their promises.
- Ethical Leadership: It reminds those in power of their duty to serve the public good, to resist the temptations of corruption, and to govern with humility and foresight.
The call for temperance in politics is not a utopian dream but a practical necessity for building and maintaining a just, stable, and flourishing society. It is the recognition that true strength lies not in unlimited power or unrestrained desire, but in the disciplined application of reason for the common good.
YouTube: "Plato Republic Temperance"
YouTube: "Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Virtue Politics"
📹 Related Video: What is Philosophy?
Video by: The School of Life
💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Idea of Temperance in Politics philosophy"