The Enduring Idea of Temperance in Politics

In an age often characterized by rapid change, fervent ideologies, and seemingly intractable divisions, the ancient idea of temperance might seem quaint, even irrelevant. Yet, as we delve into the rich tapestry of Western thought, particularly within the Great Books of the Western World, we discover that temperance is not merely a personal virtue but a foundational pillar for stable, just, and effective government. It is the principle of moderation, self-control, and balance, crucial for both individual flourishing and the health of the body politic, acting as a bulwark against the excesses that often lead to societal decay and political strife.


The Idea of Temperance: A Classical Virtue Reimagined

The notion of temperance (from the Latin temperantia, meaning moderation or self-control) has been a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry since antiquity. Far from mere abstinence, temperance signifies a harmonious ordering of desires and appetites under the guidance of reason. It is the wisdom to know when enough is enough, to resist the allure of immediate gratification, and to pursue a balanced path.

  • Defining Temperance: In the context of the individual, temperance involves mastering one's passions and impulses. For the statesman or the government, it translates into prudent decision-making, fiscal responsibility, and the judicious exercise of power.
  • Virtue and Vice: The classical philosophers, notably Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics, presented temperance as a golden mean between two extremes: insensibility (deficiency) and self-indulgence (excess). In politics, the absence of temperance manifests as vice: unchecked ambition, demagoguery, corruption, and the pursuit of power for its own sake. Conversely, its presence fosters political virtue, leading to stable institutions and a flourishing society.

Temperance in Government and Governance

The application of temperance to the political sphere is profound. A government infused with this idea understands the limits of its power and acts with restraint, recognizing that true strength lies not in absolute control but in judicious management.

Characteristics of Temperate Governance:

  • Prudent Decision-Making: Prioritizing long-term stability and common good over short-term political gains or populist demands. This involves careful consideration of consequences and a willingness to compromise.
  • Fiscal Responsibility: Moderation in public spending, avoiding excessive debt, and ensuring resources are allocated wisely to serve the populace, rather than enriching a few or pandering to special interests.
  • Respect for Dissent and Dialogue: A temperate government does not demonize opposing views but engages with them constructively, fostering an environment where rational discourse can thrive.
  • Checks and Balances: Institutional mechanisms designed to prevent the concentration and abuse of power are inherently expressions of political temperance, reflecting a recognition of human fallibility and the dangers of unchecked authority.
  • Civic Education: Promoting an informed and rational citizenry capable of self-governance and critical thinking, thereby cultivating temperance among the populace itself.

When government leaders lack temperance, they succumb to hubris, authoritarian tendencies, or reckless populism. They may prioritize their own power or the demands of a narrow faction over the broader welfare, leading to instability and injustice. The idea of temperance thus acts as a vital safeguard against political pathology.

(Image: A classical Greek fresco depicting the allegory of Temperance, often shown as a female figure pouring water from one vessel into another, symbolizing the mixing of elements to achieve balance and moderation, with figures of philosophers like Plato and Aristotle in the background discussing principles of governance.)


Insights from the Great Books of the Western World

The enduring relevance of temperance in politics is deeply rooted in the foundational texts of Western philosophy.

  • Plato's Republic: Plato envisioned temperance not just as an individual virtue but as a state of harmony within the polis. For a just city, temperance means that all classes – rulers, auxiliaries, and producers – agree on who should govern, with the rational part (the philosopher-kings) holding sway over the spirited and appetitive parts. This societal temperance ensures order and prevents chaos arising from unchecked desires or ambitions.
  • Aristotle's Politics: Aristotle, in his exploration of the best form of government, emphasized the importance of the middle class and the avoidance of extremes. A polity (a mixed constitution combining elements of oligarchy and democracy) represents a temperate approach, balancing the interests of the rich and the poor to prevent factionalism and revolution. He argued that the most stable states are those where the middle element is numerous and stronger than either of the extremes.
  • Later Thinkers: The spirit of temperance echoes in later works as well. John Locke's arguments for limited government and the separation of powers, or Montesquieu's detailed analysis of checks and balances, can be seen as institutionalized forms of political temperance, designed to prevent the vice of tyranny and promote the virtue of liberty under law.

The Modern Political Landscape: A Renewed Call for Temperance

In our contemporary world, where political discourse often devolves into shouting matches and policy-making is swayed by immediate polls or social media trends, the idea of temperance offers a crucial antidote. Polarization, the rise of populism, and a pervasive short-term mentality are all symptoms of a lack of political temperance.

Reintroducing this virtue into public life means:

  • Encouraging leaders to exercise self-restraint in speech and action.
  • Promoting policies that prioritize long-term sustainability over instant gratification.
  • Fostering a civic culture where citizens engage in thoughtful debate rather than tribalistic antagonism.

Ultimately, the pursuit of temperance in politics is not about weakness or indecision, but about cultivating strength through balance, wisdom through moderation, and stability through self-control. It is the recognition that true power lies in judicious application, and lasting success is built on a foundation of measured action and reasoned thought.


Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato Temperance Republic" or "Aristotle Virtue Ethics Politics""

Share this post