The Historical Cycles of Revolution and Revolution

The Enduring Rhythm of Upheaval: Unpacking the Historical Cycles of Revolution

Summary

Revolutions, far from being isolated historical anomalies, often manifest as predictable patterns of societal change, meticulously observed and analyzed by the greatest minds throughout human history. From the ancient Greek philosophers to the Enlightenment thinkers and beyond, the Great Books of the Western World reveal that the overthrow of government and the subsequent reshaping of social order are often cyclical, driven by recurring forces of injustice, ambition, and the relentless human pursuit of a better, albeit often fleeting, ideal. Understanding these historical cycles of revolution is not merely an academic exercise but a critical lens through which to interpret and perhaps even anticipate the future of political change.

The Enduring Rhythm of Upheaval: An Introduction

To truly grasp the essence of revolution is to acknowledge its perennial presence in the human story. Like the turning of seasons or the ebb and flow of tides, societies appear to move through distinct phases, culminating at times in violent, transformative change. The foundational texts within the Great Books of the Western World provide an invaluable framework for understanding these historical cycles, presenting revolution not as a random eruption but as an intrinsic, often predictable, element in the evolution of government and civilization itself.

I. Ancient Insights: From Stability to Sedition

The earliest philosophical inquiries into political change reveal a profound understanding of the forces that undermine and reshape states.

A. Plato's Degeneration of Governments

In his seminal work, The Republic, Plato posited a cyclical degeneration of ideal government. Starting from an aristocracy ruled by the wise, he charted a course through:

Timocracy: Rule by honor, where the love of gain begins to corrupt.
Oligarchy: Rule by the wealthy, where money becomes the sole criterion for power, leading to a stark division between rich and poor.
Democracy: A reaction against oligarchy, characterized by excessive freedom and a lack of discipline, often leading to mob rule.
Tyranny: The inevitable outcome of unchecked democracy, where a strongman emerges from the chaos to impose order, often through force.

Plato's cycle underscores that the very virtues of one form of government can, when taken to an extreme or corrupted, sow the seeds of its own destruction and the change to the next.

B. Aristotle's Causes of Revolution

Aristotle, in Politics, took a more empirical approach, meticulously cataloging the causes and mechanisms of revolution. He observed that the primary drivers of change are:

Inequality: The desire for equality by those who feel unjustly treated, or the desire for even greater superiority by those already powerful.
Desire for Gain and Honor: Ambition and greed are potent forces that can incite revolution.
Insolence and Fear: The arrogance of rulers or the fear of oppression by the ruled.
Disproportionate Increase in Power: When one part of the state grows too powerful, it can disrupt the balance and lead to conflict.
Electoral Intrigues and Neglect of Trifles: Small, seemingly insignificant issues can escalate into major revolutions if left unaddressed.

Aristotle's analysis highlights that revolutions are not always grand ideological struggles but often stem from fundamental imbalances and human passions within the existing government.

II. Machiavelli and the Realpolitik of Change

Centuries later, Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince and Discourses on Livy offered a starkly pragmatic view of power, government, and revolution. For Machiavelli, change was a constant, and the ruler's primary task was to understand and manage it.

The Nature of Fortune: Machiavelli acknowledged the role of unpredictable events, or "fortune," in political change, but emphasized the ruler's ability to adapt and act decisively.
Maintaining Power: He advised rulers on how to acquire and maintain power, often through ruthless means, recognizing that the populace's discontent could swiftly lead to revolution. The constant tension between the desires of the people and the actions of the government is a perpetual source of potential upheaval.

The Enlightenment era brought a new philosophical justification for revolution, moving beyond mere observation to articulate a right to change government.

A. Locke and the Right to Revolution

John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, argued that government derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed. If a government breaches the social contract by failing to protect the natural rights of its citizens (life, liberty, and property), the people have a right, even a duty, to dissolve that government and establish a new one. This concept profoundly influenced subsequent revolutions, particularly the American and French.

B. Rousseau's General Will and Revolutionary Potential

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in The Social Contract, explored the idea of the "general will" – the collective good that individuals agree to pursue. When a government fails to represent or act upon this general will, it loses its legitimacy, creating the conditions for radical change and revolution.

IV. The Modern Perspective: Economic Forces and Class Struggle

The 19th century introduced an economic interpretation of history and revolution, most notably articulated by Karl Marx.

A. Marx's Dialectical Materialism

In The Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital, Karl Marx posited that history is a sequence of class struggles, driven by the means of production and the inherent contradictions within economic systems. For Marx, revolution was not merely a political event but an inevitable outcome of these material forces, a necessary change to advance society from one stage (e.g., feudalism to capitalism) to the next (capitalism to communism). The overthrow of the capitalist government by the proletariat was, in his view, a historical necessity.

V. Common Threads in the Tapestry of Revolution

Despite their differing perspectives, the Great Books reveal several recurring themes that underpin the historical cycles of revolution:

Injustice and Inequality: A persistent sense of unfairness, whether economic, social, or political, is a primary catalyst for change.
The Erosion of Legitimacy: When a government loses the trust and consent of its people, its authority crumbles, paving the way for revolution.
The Power of Ideas: Philosophical concepts, whether of natural rights, class struggle, or divine mandate, provide the intellectual framework and motivation for revolutionary movements.
The Cycle of Power: New revolutionary governments often face the same challenges as their predecessors, sometimes falling prey to the very forces of discontent they once championed, thus perpetuating the cycle of change.

VI. Conclusion: The Perpetual Dialectic of History

The study of history through the lens of the Great Books of the Western World makes it abundantly clear: revolution is a fundamental, cyclical aspect of human political life. From the ancient polis to the modern nation-state, the dynamics of power, government, and societal change follow discernible patterns. While the specific triggers and ideologies evolve, the underlying human desires for justice, equality, and self-governance remain constant. By understanding these historical cycles, we gain not only a deeper appreciation for the past but also a critical framework for navigating the perpetual dialectic of change that shapes our future.

(Image: A stylized depiction of Ouroboros, the serpent eating its own tail, encircling a classical column that is simultaneously crumbling and being rebuilt, symbolizing the cyclical nature of destruction and creation inherent in historical revolutions and the constant transformation of government and society.)

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Theory of Government Cycles Explained""