The Evolution of Moral Customs

By Daniel Fletcher

Moral customs are not immutable decrees etched in stone; they are dynamic, ever-shifting currents in the vast ocean of human experience. This article explores how our understanding of right and wrong, good and bad, has undergone profound evolution throughout history, driven by societal change, philosophical inquiry, and the persistent human effort to define virtue and vice. We will delve into the interplay of custom and convention, tracing how these foundational elements of morality adapt, transform, and occasionally revolutionize our collective ethical landscape, drawing insights from the enduring wisdom of the Great Books.

The Shifting Sands of Morality: Custom and Convention

From the earliest records of human civilization, it becomes evident that what is deemed morally acceptable or abhorrent is deeply rooted in custom and convention. The ancient Greek historian Herodotus, in his Histories, famously recounted the story of Darius and the differing funeral practices of Greeks and Callatians, illustrating that what one culture considers sacred, another might find repulsive. This early observation underscores a fundamental philosophical insight: many of our moral codes are not universal truths but rather products of specific times, places, and social agreements.

Philosophers like Plato, in his Republic, grappled with the distinction between laws derived from pure reason and those born of societal tradition. While he sought an ideal, unchanging form of justice, he simultaneously depicted a society where the specific manifestations of justice and virtue were inextricably linked to its structure and educational customs. Later thinkers, particularly those concerned with the social contract, like Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan or John Locke in his Two Treatises of Government, further explored how custom and convention arise from the necessities of social living, moving humanity from a state of nature to one governed by agreed-upon rules and shared moral expectations.

The Role of Convention in Shaping Ethics:

  • Social Cohesion: Conventions provide a framework for predictable interaction, fostering trust and cooperation.
  • Cultural Identity: Shared customs solidify group identity and differentiate one society from another.
  • Practical Necessity: Many early moral rules likely emerged from practical needs for survival and resource management.

(Image: An intricate medieval illuminated manuscript depicting a debate between philosophers in a scholastic setting, with one figure pointing towards a scroll representing ancient texts and another gesturing towards a group of common people, symbolizing the interplay between abstract moral theory and lived societal customs.)

Drivers of Change: From Tradition to Transformation

If moral customs are conventional, what then drives their evolution and change? The answers are multifaceted, ranging from technological innovation to profound philosophical shifts.

Consider the dramatic change in moral attitudes towards usury (lending money at interest). What was once condemned as a grave sin in many medieval Christian societies, following interpretations of biblical texts and thinkers like Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica, gradually became an accepted, even foundational, practice in modern economic systems. This transformation was fueled by economic necessities, the rise of merchant classes, and new philosophical justifications for profit and capital.

Catalysts for Moral Evolution:

Driver of Change Description Philosophical Connection
Technological Advance New technologies create novel ethical dilemmas (e.g., artificial intelligence, genetic engineering) and alter societal structures, demanding new moral frameworks. Challenges traditional ethics (e.g., Aristotle's virtue ethics) to adapt to unprecedented situations; prompts utilitarian considerations of consequences.
Economic Shifts Changes in modes of production, trade, and wealth distribution reshape values concerning labor, property, and justice. Influences social contract theories (Locke on property), critiques of capitalism (Marx), and discussions of distributive justice.
Philosophical Discourse New ideas challenging existing norms, fostering critical reflection, and proposing alternative ethical systems. The very core of the Great Books tradition, from Plato's forms to Kant's categorical imperative, constantly re-evaluating moral foundations.
Social Movements Collective efforts to address perceived injustices, leading to shifts in rights, equality, and social responsibility (e.g., abolitionism, civil rights, feminism). Often rooted in appeals to universal human rights (Locke, Rousseau) or a re-evaluation of who counts in moral consideration.
Cultural Exchange Exposure to different societies and their customs can broaden perspectives, challenge ethnocentric biases, and inspire new moral practices. Highlights the conventional nature of morality (Herodotus) and encourages a more cosmopolitan ethical outlook.

Virtue and Vice: Enduring Concepts, Evolving Interpretations

While the specific applications of moral rules change, the underlying concepts of virtue and vice often persist, though their interpretations evolve. Courage, for instance, remains a virtue across millennia. However, what constitutes courageous action has transformed dramatically. For the Homeric heroes, courage was primarily martial prowess on the battlefield. For Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, courage was a mean between rashness and cowardice, applicable to various life situations. In modern times, courage might be seen in acts of civil disobedience, speaking truth to power, or enduring personal hardship.

Similarly, vice is consistently understood as a moral failing, yet specific actions categorized as vicious have shifted. Gluttony, once a cardinal sin, might now be viewed more as a health issue than a moral one, while new vices like digital addiction or ecological irresponsibility emerge. The evolution of moral customs is not merely about discarding old rules, but often about recontextualizing enduring ethical principles within new realities. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant, with his emphasis on universal moral duties and the categorical imperative, attempted to anchor morality in principles that transcend specific customs, yet even the application of these universal duties requires interpretation within a changing world.

The Philosophical Lens on Moral Progress

Does the evolution of moral customs imply moral progress? This is a question that has occupied philosophers for centuries. Some, particularly during the Enlightenment, believed in a trajectory of human reason leading inevitably to a more enlightened and just morality. Others, like Nietzsche, viewed such "progress" with skepticism, seeing it as a domestication of human will or a re-evaluation of values that might not always be for the better.

Regardless of whether one believes in linear moral progress, the study of the evolution of moral customs reveals a compelling narrative of human striving. It highlights our continuous effort to define what it means to live a good life, to build just societies, and to navigate the complex interplay between individual conscience and collective custom and convention. The Great Books serve as our invaluable guide, offering a rich tapestry of perspectives on this ongoing human endeavor.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""History of Ethics Philosophy Documentary""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Explained""

Share this post