The Enduring Philosophical Scrutiny of Slavery and the State

The question of slavery is not merely a historical or sociological one; it is, at its core, a profound philosophical challenge to our understanding of Ethics, Justice, and the very purpose of the State. From antiquity, philosophers have grappled with its implications, often attempting to rationalize it, while later thinkers systematically dismantled its intellectual foundations. This article delves into how the Great Books of the Western World illuminate this tumultuous journey, examining how the State has historically sanctioned and enforced slavery, and how evolving philosophical thought, particularly concerning individual rights and universal Justice, ultimately condemned it as an indefensible moral atrocity.

Ancient Justifications: The Perilous Pursuit of Order

For centuries, slavery was a deeply entrenched institution, and many of the brightest minds of their eras, including those foundational to Western thought, sought to understand or even justify its existence. Within the Great Books, we find compelling, albeit troubling, examples of this intellectual endeavor.

Perhaps the most influential ancient philosophical defense of slavery comes from Aristotle's Politics. He posited a concept of natural slavery, arguing that some individuals were inherently suited to be slaves due to a perceived lack of deliberative faculty, making them "living tools" meant to serve masters for the good of the household and, by extension, the State.

  • Aristotle's Core Arguments for Natural Slavery:
    • Natural Hierarchy: Some are born to rule, others to be ruled.
    • Mutual Benefit: The master benefits from service, the slave benefits from guidance and protection, lacking the capacity for self-governance.
    • Economic Necessity: Slavery allows citizens to pursue higher intellectual and political endeavors, vital for the flourishing of the polis.
    • Justice within the Household: Aristotle saw this arrangement as a form of justice within the domestic sphere, contributing to the overall order of the State.

This perspective, while abhorrent to modern sensibilities, highlights how deeply philosophical reasoning could be intertwined with existing social structures, leading to the rationalization of profound injustice. The Ethics of the time were often contextualized within a hierarchical understanding of the world.

The State's Complicity: Law, Power, and the Denial of Personhood

The institution of slavery was rarely a purely private affair; it was typically codified and enforced by the State. Laws dictated who could be enslaved, how they could be treated, and the rights (or lack thereof) accorded to them.

  • Mechanisms of State Sanction:
    • Legal Codification: Laws defined slaves as property, not persons, stripping them of legal standing, rights, and often their very humanity.
    • Enforcement: The State's apparatus – its courts, police, and military – was used to capture runaways, suppress rebellions, and protect the "property rights" of slaveholders.
    • Economic Integration: The State often built its economy upon slave labor, making it a vested interest to maintain the system, illustrating a profound conflict between economic utility and universal Justice.
    • Citizenship Exclusion: Slaves were systematically excluded from citizenship, denying them any political voice or means to challenge their condition through legitimate channels within the State.

(Image: A detailed depiction of a Roman legal scroll, unrolled to show intricate Latin script, with an accompanying stylus and inkwell. The scroll's text features highlighted sections pertaining to property rights and the legal status of individuals, subtly hinting at the codification of slavery within ancient law.)

Challenging the Premise: The Rise of Universal Justice and Natural Rights

The philosophical tide began to turn, particularly with the Enlightenment thinkers whose works also form cornerstones of the Great Books collection. Their emphasis on natural rights, individual liberty, and the social contract fundamentally undermined the philosophical justifications for slavery.

  • John Locke's Influence: In his Second Treatise of Government, Locke argued for inherent natural rights to life, liberty, and property. He contended that no one could legitimately enslave another, as liberty was an inalienable right. While his own views on slavery were complex and historically problematic, his foundational arguments for individual freedom and government by consent provided powerful intellectual ammunition against arbitrary power, including that exercised over slaves. For Locke, true Justice derived from natural law, not arbitrary human decrees.

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Critique: Rousseau, in The Social Contract, passionately argued for human freedom and against any form of subjugation. He declared that "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." For Rousseau, to surrender one's liberty was to surrender one's humanity, making slavery an unnatural and illegitimate condition that could not be justified by any social contract or State power.

  • Montesquieu on Liberty: In The Spirit of the Laws, Montesquieu examined different forms of government and societal structures. He offered scathing critiques of slavery, particularly noting its corrupting influence on both master and slave, and its incompatibility with true liberty and a just State. He argued that Justice demanded freedom.

These thinkers, among others, shifted the philosophical debate from justifying existing social hierarchies to advocating for universal human dignity and rights, placing the burden of proof on those who would deny liberty.

The Evolving Concept of Justice: From Particular to Universal

The journey from Aristotle's "natural slavery" to the unequivocal condemnation of the institution reflects a profound evolution in the understanding of Justice. Initially, Justice was often conceived within particular social orders, where hierarchy was assumed. However, with the Enlightenment and subsequent philosophical movements, Justice began to be understood as a universal principle, applicable to all human beings irrespective of birth, status, or perceived capacity.

This shift was critical:

  • From Status to Personhood: The focus moved from a person's social status (citizen, slave, foreigner) to their inherent personhood, endowed with fundamental rights and dignity.
  • From Utility to Morality: The debate moved beyond the economic or social utility of slavery to its inherent immorality and violation of fundamental Ethics.
  • The State as Upholder of Universal Justice: The ideal State transitioned from one that merely maintained order (even unjust order) to one that actively protected the universal rights and liberties of all individuals, ensuring true Justice.

Conclusion: A Perpetual Vigilance for Justice

The philosophical examination of slavery and the State serves as a potent reminder of the dangers inherent in rationalizing injustice and the critical importance of continuous ethical inquiry. The Great Books of the Western World provide not only the historical arguments that supported slavery but also the powerful intellectual tools that ultimately dismantled it.

The historical complicity of the State in perpetuating slavery underscores the profound responsibility of governance. A truly just State must be founded upon principles that uphold the inherent dignity and liberty of every individual, never again allowing economic expediency or perceived social order to eclipse universal Ethics and Justice. The struggle against dehumanization, in all its forms, remains a perpetual philosophical and societal vigilance.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle on Slavery" for a philosophical analysis of his arguments."

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Locke's Philosophy of Natural Rights and Government" for context on challenges to absolute power."

Share this post