The Ethics of The Ethics of Slavery and the State

The Unbearable Weight: Examining the Ethics of Slavery and the State

Summary: The institution of slavery, a dark stain on human history, presents one of philosophy's most profound ethical dilemmas. This article delves into the inherent moral bankruptcy of slavery, exploring how various states historically sanctioned, protected, and even promoted it, thereby perverting the very essence of justice. We will examine the philosophical justifications offered for slavery, primarily through the lens of the Great Books of the Western World, and critically assess the State's complicity in a practice that fundamentally violates human dignity and autonomy, ultimately arguing for the indispensable role of ethics in shaping the State's commitment to universal justice.

The Ancient Shadow: Slavery's Enduring Philosophical Challenge

From the earliest city-states to the sprawling empires, slavery has been a pervasive, albeit morally repugnant, feature of human civilization. It is not merely a historical footnote but a persistent philosophical challenge that forces us to confront fundamental questions about human nature, liberty, and the legitimate scope of power. How could societies, often boasting sophisticated legal and political structures, rationalize the reduction of human beings to mere chattel? The answer lies in a complex interplay of economic necessity, social hierarchy, and, disturbingly, philosophical justification, often endorsed or enforced by the State.

Philosophical Justifications and Their Ethical Collapse

To understand the ethics of slavery, we must first confront the arguments that sought to legitimize it. Among the most influential, and now most widely condemned, is that put forth by Aristotle in his Politics, a seminal text within the Great Books of the Western World.

Aristotle posited the concept of the "natural slave," arguing that some individuals were inherently suited to be ruled, lacking the full capacity for reason and self-governance. He suggested that such individuals benefited from being guided by a master, making slavery a "natural" and even mutually beneficial arrangement.

Aristotle's Argument (from Politics):
- Natural Hierarchy: Some are born to rule, others to be ruled.
- Lack of Deliberative Faculty: Natural slaves possess reason only to the extent of perceiving it in others, not for independent deliberation.
- Mutual Benefit: Masters provide guidance and protection; slaves provide labor.
- Property: A slave is a "possession which can be used as an instrument of action, separate from the body."

However, this argument crumbles under ethical scrutiny. It is an argument from convenience and perceived utility, not from inherent moral worth. It fails to account for the universal human capacity for reason, choice, and suffering. The very notion of a "natural slave" is a profound ethical fallacy, serving to dehumanize and rationalize oppression rather than to describe a genuine human condition.

The State's Hand: Legislation, Enforcement, and Complicity

The philosophical justifications, however flawed, were often interwoven with the practical machinery of the State. Governments, rather than acting as guarantors of universal justice, frequently became the primary instruments for the institutionalization and perpetuation of slavery.

How the State Enabled Slavery:
- Legal Codification: Laws defined slaves as property, not persons, stripping them of rights and legal standing.
- Property Rights: The State protected the "ownership" of slaves, treating them no differently than land or livestock.
- Enforcement Mechanisms: Police, military, and judicial systems were used to capture runaways, suppress rebellions, and punish those who aided slaves.
- Economic Integration: State policies often facilitated the slave trade and economies reliant on slave labor.

The State's role here highlights a critical tension: Is the State's primary function to uphold existing social orders, however unjust, or to safeguard fundamental human rights and principles of justice? Historically, in the context of slavery, many states demonstrably chose the former, sacrificing ethics for economic and political expediency.

The Ethical Imperative: Justice, Dignity, and Freedom

At its core, slavery is an egregious violation of ethics because it denies the inherent dignity and autonomy of a human being. It reduces an individual to a means to an end, stripping them of their freedom, self-ownership, and capacity for moral agency.

Key Ethical Principles Violated by Slavery:

Ethical Principle	Violation in Slavery
Autonomy	Denies self-determination, choice, and free will.
Dignity	Treats a person as a thing, not as an end in themselves.
Equality	Establishes a permanent, unjust hierarchy based on force.
Justice	Denies fundamental rights, fairness, and due process.
Liberty	Imprisons, confines, and controls every aspect of life.

The call for abolition, therefore, was not merely a political movement but a profound ethical awakening. Thinkers like John Locke, whose ideas on natural rights influenced the American and French Revolutions (also part of the Great Books canon), articulated principles that were fundamentally incompatible with slavery, even if he himself did not fully extend them to all people in his time. The Enlightenment's emphasis on individual rights, liberty, and rational thought laid the philosophical groundwork for challenging the State's authority to sanction such an inhumane practice.

The Long Road to Abolition: Ethical Evolution and State Reckoning

The eventual abolition of slavery in many parts of the world was a testament to the power of evolving ethics and the slow, often painful, reorientation of the State's moral compass. It required not just philosophical arguments but also social movements, political struggle, and, tragically, often violent conflict. The American Civil War, for instance, represents a cataclysmic State reckoning with its foundational ethical contradiction.

The shift from a State that protected slavery to one that outlawed it involved:

Moral Persuasion: Abolitionists appealed to universal human rights and religious ethics.
Economic Shifts: Industrialization gradually reduced the perceived necessity of slave labor in some regions.
Political Will: Leaders and movements pushed for legislative change and constitutional amendments.
International Pressure: Growing global condemnation of the slave trade and institution.

Even after abolition, the legacy of slavery continues to challenge our understanding of justice, demanding reparations, addressing systemic inequalities, and combating modern forms of human trafficking, which represent contemporary manifestations of this ancient evil.

Conclusion: The Enduring Ethical Imperative

The ethics of slavery and the State's role in its perpetuation offer a stark lesson: no institution, however ancient or economically entrenched, can withstand the scrutiny of fundamental moral principles. The Great Books of the Western World provide both the justifications that were once accepted and the philosophical tools that ultimately dismantled them. The State, as the ultimate arbiter of laws and protector of its citizens, bears an immense ethical responsibility. Its legitimacy is inextricably linked to its commitment to justice, liberty, and the inherent dignity of every human being. Where the State fails in this, it forfeits its moral authority and becomes an instrument of oppression. The battle against slavery, in all its forms, past and present, is a perpetual reminder that eternal vigilance is the price of true justice.

**## 📹 Related Video: ARISTOTLE ON: The Nicomachean Ethics