The Ethics of The Ethics of Desire

The Unruly Heart: Navigating the Ethics of Desire

A Labyrinth of Will and Consequence

Our desires, those persistent stirrings within, are often the primary engines of our actions, yet their ethical implications have perplexed philosophers for millennia. This article delves into how some of the greatest minds in the Western tradition have grappled with desire, examining its relationship to will, the shaping of good and evil, and the very essence of an ethical life. From the ancient Greeks' pursuit of harmony to modern existential inquiries, we explore the intricate dance between what we want and what we ought to do, revealing that the path to moral clarity often begins with understanding the unruly heart.

The Genesis of Longing: Desire in Ancient Thought

From the earliest philosophical inquiries, desire has been recognized as a fundamental aspect of the human condition, simultaneously a source of great potential and profound peril. The sages of antiquity, whose wisdom forms the bedrock of the Great Books of the Western World, understood that an unexamined life, driven solely by unbridled appetites, was a life unfulfilled.

Plato's Tripartite Soul: In his Republic, Plato famously described the soul as having three parts: the rational, the spirited, and the appetitive. Desire, in its most basic form, resided in the appetitive part – the hunger for food, drink, and sensual pleasures. For Plato, an ethical life, a just life, was one where reason, guided by wisdom, held sway over the spirited and, crucially, the appetitive parts. Uncontrolled desire led to tyranny, both within the individual and in the state.
Aristotle and the Cultivation of Virtue: Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, acknowledged that desires are natural impulses. However, he argued that true happiness (eudaimonia) is achieved not by suppressing desire entirely, but by training it. Through habituation and practical wisdom (phronesis), our desires can be directed towards virtuous ends. The temperate person, for instance, desires pleasures in the right way, at the right time, and in the right amount. Here, the will plays a crucial role in shaping desire into a force for good.
The Stoic Path to Apathy: For the Stoics, like Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius, many desires were seen as external, irrational disturbances that disrupted inner tranquility. Their ideal was apatheia, not an absence of feeling, but freedom from passions (like excessive desire, fear, or anger) that are contrary to reason. The will was paramount in assenting only to what is rational and within one's control, thereby mastering the tumultuous sea of desire.

The Sacred and the Profane: Desire in the Medieval Mind

The advent of Christian philosophy introduced a new dimension to the ethics of desire, often framing it within the context of divine command and salvation.

Augustine's Cupiditas vs. Caritas: St. Augustine, a towering figure in the Great Books, profoundly influenced Western thought with his distinction between two forms of love, or desire: cupiditas (selfish desire, love of temporal things for their own sake) and caritas (selfless love, love of God and neighbor for God's sake). For Augustine, the Fall of Man corrupted human will, making it prone to cupiditas, leading to sin and evil. The ethical imperative was to reorient one's desires and will towards caritas, seeing true good only in God.

The Modern Contemplation: Will, Reason, and Power

The Enlightenment and subsequent philosophical movements brought forth new, often radical, perspectives on desire, challenging traditional notions of its place in human ethics.

Spinoza's Joyful Affirmation: Baruch Spinoza, in his Ethics, presented a deterministic view where desire (conatus) is the very essence of a being, the striving to persevere in its own being. For Spinoza, there is no inherent good or evil in desire itself; rather, actions are good if they increase one's power of acting and lead to joy, and evil if they diminish it. Freedom comes not from suppressing desire, but from understanding its causes and acting from reason, thereby aligning one's will with the natural order.
Kant's Categorical Imperative and the Good Will: Immanuel Kant, a pivotal figure in modern ethics, starkly separated morality from desire. For Kant, moral actions are not driven by inclinations or desires (which he saw as contingent and potentially selfish), but by a pure, rational Good Will acting out of duty. The Categorical Imperative dictates that one should act only according to a maxim that could be universalized. An action performed from desire might be legal but not truly moral. Here, the will to do one's duty, irrespective of personal desire, is the cornerstone of ethics.
Nietzsche and the Will to Power: Friedrich Nietzsche, a radical voice of the late 19th century, challenged conventional morality, including its repression of desire. For Nietzsche, desire is a manifestation of the Will to Power, a fundamental drive towards growth, overcoming, and self-affirmation. He famously sought a "revaluation of all values," questioning the traditional definitions of good and evil which he saw as often born from ressentiment and weakness. An ethical life, for Nietzsche, involved embracing one's desires and channeling the Will to Power creatively, transcending conventional morality.

Philosophers on Desire and Ethical Living: A Comparative Glimpse

The journey through the Great Books reveals a spectrum of thought on how desire interacts with our ethical responsibilities.

Philosopher	Core View on Desire	Role of Will	Ethical Implication
Plato	An appetitive force needing rational control.	Reason guides the will to control desire for inner harmony.	Justice and virtue achieved when reason rules desire.
Aristotle	Natural impulses, trainable for virtuous ends.	Practical wisdom trains the will to moderate and direct desire.	Eudaimonia (flourishing) through virtuous habits.
Augustine	Cupiditas (selfish) vs. Caritas (selfless).	Corrupted will leads to cupiditas; redeemed will seeks caritas.	Salvation and true good found in love of God.
Spinoza	The essence of being (conatus), striving to persevere.	Understanding leads the will to act from reason, not passion.	Freedom and joy through rational understanding of desire.
Kant	Inclinations often opposed to duty.	Good Will acts solely from duty, independent of desire.	True morality is acting from duty, not from desire or inclination.
Nietzsche	Manifestation of the Will to Power.	Embracing and directing the will to power for self-overcoming.	Revaluation of values; creating one's own good beyond conventional morality.

The Enduring Challenge: Navigating Our Own Desires

(Image: A classical sculpture, perhaps "Laocoön and His Sons," depicting a struggle against overwhelming forces, symbolizing the human struggle with powerful desires and their consequences, set against a backdrop of ancient ruins.)

The rich tapestry of philosophical thought on desire reveals that there is no single, easy answer to its ethics. Whether seen as a force to be controlled by reason, cultivated for virtue, reoriented towards the divine, understood deterministically, overcome by duty, or embraced as a fundamental drive, desire remains central to the human experience.

Our contemporary challenge is to engage with these profound insights, to examine our own desires, and to understand how our will shapes our actions and, consequently, defines our personal ethics and our contribution to the larger understanding of good and evil. The Great Books do not offer prescriptions but rather frameworks for critical self-reflection, inviting us to embark on our own philosophical journey into the unruly heart.

Further Exploration:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Republic Desire and Reason Explained""