The Ethics of The Ethics of Desire

The Labyrinth of Longing: Navigating the Ethics of Desire

Summary: The Inescapable Urge

Desire, in its myriad forms, is an undeniable force shaping human experience. From the simplest physiological urges to the loftiest intellectual aspirations, it propels us, defines us, and often confounds us. Yet, its inherent power immediately raises profound ethical questions: Is desire a mere impulse to be overcome, a neutral engine of action, or a potentially virtuous wellspring of human flourishing? This article delves into the philosophical traditions, particularly those found within the Great Books of the Western World, to explore the intricate relationship between desire, the will, and our understanding of good and evil, ultimately seeking to illuminate the ethical landscape upon which our deepest longings are enacted.

I. The Nature of Desire: A Philosophical Unpacking

To speak of the ethics of desire, one must first confront its very nature. Philosophers across millennia have grappled with this fundamental human experience, offering diverse and often conflicting perspectives.

Plato's Tripartite Soul: In The Republic, Plato famously divides the soul into three parts: the rational, the spirited, and the appetitive. The appetitive part, driven by desires for food, drink, and sensual pleasures, is often depicted as needing the guidance of reason and the spirited part. Unchecked, these desires lead to imbalance and injustice within the individual and the state.
Aristotle's Orexis: Aristotle, in works like Nicomachean Ethics, uses the term orexis (desire or appetite) to describe a fundamental drive towards an end. For Aristotle, desire itself isn't inherently bad; rather, its ethical valence depends on what it desires and how it is pursued. The virtuous person desires the good, and their desires are properly aligned with reason, leading to eudaimonia (flourishing).
Augustine's Concupiscence: For St. Augustine, particularly in Confessions, desire takes on a more problematic hue after the Fall. Concupiscence refers to the disordered desires of the flesh, a pervasive inclination towards sin that clouds the intellect and weakens the will. While humans retain the capacity to desire good, the fallen nature means that desires are often misdirected towards transient, worldly pleasures rather than divine love.
Hobbes's Mechanical Passions: Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan, presents a more mechanistic view. Desire is simply "an endeavour towards something which causes it." There is no inherent good and evil in desire itself; these are merely human constructs based on what we like or dislike. Ethics, for Hobbes, arises from the rational pursuit of self-preservation, which may require controlling certain desires.

From these varied perspectives, we glean that desire is rarely a simple phenomenon. It encompasses everything from base appetites to intellectual curiosity, from the longing for companionship to the yearning for transcendence.

II. The Will's Dominion: Desire, Freedom, and Moral Agency

The ethical dimension of desire becomes most apparent when considered in relation to the will. Is the will merely a slave to our desires, or does it possess the autonomy to choose, to direct, or even to suppress them?

The Struggle for Control: Philosophers like Immanuel Kant, in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, emphasize the crucial role of the will. For Kant, moral action is not driven by inclination or desire, but by duty, by a will acting in accordance with the moral law. Desires, being contingent and subjective, cannot be the basis for universal moral principles. The good will acts from duty, even when it conflicts with personal desires.
Weakness of Will (Akrasia): Aristotle famously explored akrasia, or weakness of will, where one knows what is good but fails to act on it due to overwhelming desire. This highlights the internal conflict between reason and appetite, where the will is seemingly overcome. This struggle underscores the ethical challenge: how do we strengthen our will to align with our rational understanding of the good?
Nietzsche's Will to Power: Friedrich Nietzsche, particularly in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, re-evaluates the will not as a subordinate to reason or morality, but as a fundamental, driving force: the will to power. This is not merely a desire for domination, but a will to grow, to overcome, to create one's own values. For Nietzsche, traditional morality often suppresses healthy, life-affirming desires, leading to a diminished human existence. The ethics here lies in affirming life and creating values, rather than merely submitting to external moral codes or suppressing desire.

The interplay between desire and will is central to our understanding of moral agency. Do we choose our desires, or do our desires choose us? The answer profoundly shapes our ethical responsibilities.

III. Desire's Dual Nature: Pathways to Good and Evil

It is clear that desire is not monolithic; it possesses the potential for both profound good and evil. The ethical challenge lies in discernment and cultivation.

Desires for the Good:
- Love of Wisdom (Philosophia): The desire for knowledge and truth, as exemplified by Plato's philosopher-king, is seen as a noble and elevating pursuit.
- Justice and Compassion: The desire for a just society, for the well-being of others, or for alleviating suffering, can motivate virtuous action.
- Creative Expression: The urge to create art, music, or literature often stems from a deep, positive desire to bring something new into the world.
- Self-Improvement: The desire for virtue, for personal growth, or for overcoming one's flaws, is a cornerstone of many ethical systems.
Desires Leading to Evil:
- Greed and Avarice: The insatiable desire for material wealth or possessions, often at the expense of others, is condemned across many ethical frameworks.
- Envy and Resentment: Desiring what others have, coupled with animosity towards them, can lead to destructive actions.
- Lust for Power: An unchecked desire for control or domination over others can result in tyranny and oppression.
- Vengeance: The desire for retribution, while sometimes understandable, can perpetuate cycles of violence and suffering if not tempered by justice and mercy.

(Image: A classical allegorical painting depicting a struggle between virtuous and vicious desires, perhaps with figures representing Reason, Temperance, and Charity contending against figures representing Greed, Envy, and Lust, set against a backdrop of ancient ruins or a moral landscape, with a central figure contemplating their choices.)

The distinction between these categories is not always clear-cut, requiring careful self-examination and ethical reflection. A desire for wealth, for instance, could be a legitimate aspiration for security or a base form of greed, depending on its intensity, its object, and the means employed to achieve it.

IV. Cultivating Ethical Desire: A Path to Flourishing

Given desire's profound impact, the question shifts from merely understanding it to actively shaping it. How can we cultivate desires that lead to good rather than evil?

Philosophers offer various strategies for managing and directing our desires:

Reason and Deliberation: Many traditions, from Plato to Kant, emphasize the role of reason in evaluating our desires. By subjecting our impulses to rational scrutiny, we can discern which desires align with our higher values and which lead us astray.
Habituation and Virtue Ethics: Aristotle's approach suggests that virtue is cultivated through habit. By repeatedly choosing virtuous actions, we gradually train our desires to align with the good. We become courageous by performing courageous acts, and eventually, we desire to act courageously.
Moderation and Temperance (The Stoics and Epicureans): The Stoics advocated for apatheia (freedom from passion) not by eliminating desire, but by controlling one's reactions to external events and focusing on what is within one's power. Epicureans sought ataraxia (tranquility) through the judicious pursuit of simple pleasures and the avoidance of pain, advocating for moderation in all desires.
Spiritual Discipline: Religious traditions often prescribe practices like meditation, prayer, fasting, and asceticism to purify desires and redirect them towards spiritual or divine ends.
Self-Knowledge: Socrates's dictum "know thyself" is crucial here. Understanding the origins and true objects of our desires allows us to address them more effectively, distinguishing between genuine needs and fleeting whims.

Conclusion: The Ongoing Challenge of Ethical Longing

The ethics of desire is not a static set of rules but a dynamic, lifelong inquiry. From the ancient Greeks who sought harmony in the soul, to the Christian theologians grappling with fallen nature, to the modern existentialists affirming individual will, the dialogue continues. Our desires are integral to who we are, driving our pursuits, shaping our character, and determining our impact on the world. The journey towards an ethical life, therefore, is inextricably linked to the journey of understanding, refining, and ultimately, directing our innermost longings towards the pursuit of the good. It is a testament to the enduring human spirit that we perpetually seek to master the labyrinth of our own hearts.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Republic desire and soul""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Kant ethics duty desire""