The Ethical Dimension of War and Peace: A Philosophical Inquiry

Summary: This article delves into the profound ethical questions surrounding War and Peace, exploring how philosophical traditions, particularly those found in the Great Books of the Western World, grapple with the morality of conflict, the concept of Duty, and the perennial struggle between Good and Evil. We will examine historical frameworks like Just War Theory, the demanding nature of moral obligations in times of conflict, and the enduring quest for a just and lasting peace.

From the earliest epic poems to the most intricate treatises on statecraft, humanity has wrestled with the terrifying specter of war. It is a phenomenon that strips away the veneer of civility, forcing individuals and societies to confront their deepest values and most primal fears. For the philosopher, War and Peace present an ultimate ethical challenge: how can we apply principles of right and wrong, justice and compassion, to acts of organized violence and profound suffering? This is not merely an academic exercise; it is an urgent inquiry into the very fabric of our moral existence. The enduring wisdom found within the Great Books of the Western World offers invaluable guidance, providing a historical continuum of thought on these most pressing matters.

Foundations of Ethical Inquiry in War

The quest to understand the ethical dimensions of conflict is as old as philosophy itself. Ancient thinkers laid the groundwork for examining the legitimacy of war and the conduct within it.

Early Philosophical Musings

  • Plato, in his Republic, envisioned an ideal state where justice permeated all levels, including its defense. While recognizing the necessity of guardians, he emphasized their training in virtue and the pursuit of a harmonious society. War, in his view, was often a result of internal discord or external threats to a just order.
  • Aristotle, in his Politics, explored the nature of the state and its purpose, which included securing the well-being of its citizens. He considered war a means to an end, justifiable only when necessary to achieve a greater good or defend the state's virtuous life, always subordinating it to the pursuit of peace.

These foundational ideas began to shape the discourse, moving beyond mere survival to questions of moral justification.

The Emergence of Just War Theory

Perhaps the most influential framework for the Ethics of war emerged from Christian theology, significantly shaped by St. Augustine and later meticulously refined by St. Thomas Aquinas. Known as Just War Theory, it attempts to provide a moral compass for states contemplating and engaging in conflict, dividing ethical considerations into two main categories: Jus ad bellum (justice in going to war) and Jus in bello (justice in the conduct of war).

Jus ad Bellum (Justice in Going to War):
This set of criteria must be met before a war can be considered ethically justifiable:

  • Just Cause: War must be waged for a morally legitimate reason, such as self-defense against aggression or to avert grave injustice.
  • Legitimate Authority: Only a properly constituted public authority (e.g., a sovereign state) can declare war.
  • Right Intention: The primary motive for war must be to achieve a just peace, not for territorial gain or revenge.
  • Last Resort: All peaceful alternatives must have been exhausted before resorting to armed conflict.
  • Proportionality: The good to be achieved by war must outweigh the harm that will be caused.
  • Reasonable Hope of Success: There must be a realistic chance of achieving the war's just objectives, to avoid futile loss of life.

Jus in Bello (Justice in the Conduct of War):
Once war has begun, these principles govern how it should be fought:

  • Discrimination (Non-Combatant Immunity): Military force must distinguish between combatants and non-combatants, targeting only the former.
  • Proportionality: The force used must be proportionate to the military objective, avoiding excessive or unnecessary destruction.
  • Necessity: Only the minimum force necessary to achieve a legitimate military objective should be used.

Generated Image

The Weight of Duty: Conscience in Conflict

The concept of Duty takes on a particularly acute and often agonizing form in the context of war. Soldiers, leaders, and even citizens face profound moral obligations that can clash with personal conscience.

  • Duty to the State: Citizens are often expected to defend their nation, a duty that can extend to military service and sacrifice.
  • Duty to Comrades: Within the ranks, an intense loyalty and duty to protect fellow soldiers often overrides other considerations.
  • Duty to Humanity: Yet, there is also a higher moral Duty to uphold universal ethical principles, even in the chaos of battle. This is where the tension arises, particularly when orders conflict with deeply held moral beliefs.

Immanuel Kant, a towering figure in the Great Books, emphasized the categorical imperative: acting only according to maxims that one could will to become universal law. While Kant himself was a proponent of perpetual peace, his emphasis on Duty and the inherent dignity of rational beings profoundly influences how we consider the moral obligations of individuals caught in conflict. Can killing ever be universalized? Can treating another human being as merely a means to an end (a military objective) be reconciled with Kantian ethics? These questions highlight the immense moral burden placed upon those involved in war.

The Ambiguity of Good and Evil

In the simplified narratives often presented during conflict, one side is frequently cast as Good and the other as Evil. However, philosophy compels us to look beyond such simplistic binaries. The reality of war is a complex tapestry of motivations, actions, and consequences, where the lines between Good and Evil become blurred.

  • Moral Injury: Soldiers returning from war often grapple not just with physical wounds but with profound "moral injury"—the psychological distress resulting from actions that violate one's deeply held moral beliefs, or from witnessing such violations. This speaks to the inherent difficulty of maintaining one's sense of Good in the face of actions that seem unequivocally Evil.
  • Consequences of Actions: Even actions undertaken with a "just cause" can lead to unintended and catastrophic consequences, raising further ethical questions about responsibility and accountability. The bombing of Dresden or Hiroshima, for example, continue to provoke intense debate about proportionality and the targeting of civilians, regardless of the stated intentions.

The ethical dimension of war forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth that Good intentions can pave the way for terrible outcomes, and that the label of Evil often depends on one's perspective and position in the conflict.

The Imperative of Peace

While much of the ethical discourse focuses on the justification and conduct of war, philosophy also places a profound emphasis on the pursuit and maintenance of Peace. The ultimate goal of any just war, according to theorists like Aquinas, is a more stable and righteous peace.

  • Ethical Foundations of Peace: The Ethics of peace involve diplomacy, international law, and the cultivation of mutual understanding and respect. Philosophers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant explored the conditions necessary for perpetual peace, advocating for republican governments and international federations to prevent conflict.
  • Post-Conflict Justice and Reconciliation: The ethical dimension extends beyond the cessation of hostilities to the rebuilding of societies. This involves questions of transitional justice, reparations, forgiveness, and the long, arduous process of healing divisions and restoring trust. The ethical imperative here is to prevent future cycles of violence and to ensure that justice is served, even as reconciliation is pursued.

The philosophical journey through War and Peace is not merely an analysis of past conflicts but a continuous ethical project aimed at understanding how humanity can move towards a more just and peaceful future.

YouTube: "Just War Theory explained"
YouTube: "Kant's Perpetual Peace philosophy"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Ethical Dimension of War and Peace philosophy"

Share this post