The Distinction Between Opinion and Sense and Distinction

The Essential Divide: Unpacking the Distinction Between Opinion and Sense

Summary: The Bedrock of Understanding

In the vast landscape of human thought, few distinctions are as fundamental yet frequently blurred as that between opinion and sense. At its core, this article asserts that an opinion is a subjective belief, often personal and unsubstantiated, while sense represents a grounded understanding, derived from reasoned apprehension, empirical observation, or logical coherence, serving as a pathway towards knowledge. Drawing from the rich tapestry of the Great Books of the Western World, we explore why discerning this difference is crucial for intellectual growth, critical thinking, and the pursuit of truth.

The Enduring Quest for Truth: A Philosophical Imperative

Since antiquity, philosophers have grappled with the nature of what we think we know. From Plato's allegory of the cave, where shadows are mistaken for reality, to Aristotle's meticulous categorizations of knowing, the challenge has always been to differentiate mere assertion from genuine insight. This pursuit necessitates a rigorous distinction between the fleeting, often emotionally charged realm of personal belief – our opinions – and the more stable, verifiable domain of sense, which guides us towards objective knowledge.

The Realm of Opinion: Subjectivity Unbound

An opinion is, by its very nature, subjective. It is a personal judgment, belief, or viewpoint that may or may not be based on facts or reason. While opinions are a vital part of individual expression and democratic discourse, their philosophical weight is often light.

Characteristics of Opinion:
- Personal: Rooted in individual experience, preference, or bias.
- Unsubstantiated: Often lacks rigorous evidence or logical proof.
- Changeable: Can shift easily with new information, mood, or social influence.
- Non-Verifiable: Not necessarily amenable to objective testing or universal agreement.
- Prevalent: Forms the bulk of everyday conversation and casual thought.

Consider the political commentator expressing a strong belief about policy without presenting supporting data, or the art critic declaring a painting "ugly" based purely on personal taste. These are valid expressions of opinion, but they do not constitute knowledge. As Plato argued in The Republic, doxa (opinion or belief) exists in a realm distinct from episteme (true knowledge), often dwelling in the twilight zone between being and non-being.

(Image: A classical Greek philosopher, perhaps Plato or Aristotle, stands before a group of attentive students, gesturing towards a blackboard or tablet inscribed with symbols and geometric shapes, symbolizing the pursuit of reasoned understanding over mere conjecture.)

The Path of Sense: Towards Understanding and Reality

In contrast to opinion, sense represents a mode of apprehension that strives for coherence, justification, and alignment with reality. It is the faculty or process by which we grasp meaning, discern truth, or construct a reliable understanding of the world. This can manifest in several ways:

Sensory Perception (Empirical Sense): The direct apprehension of reality through our five senses, which, when properly interpreted and verified, forms the bedrock of empirical knowledge. Aristotle, in works like De Anima, extensively explored how sensory input, processed by the mind, leads to understanding. This isn't just raw data; it's the making sense of that data.
Rational Coherence (Logical Sense): The capacity to understand logical connections, principles, and implications. When something "makes sense" in this context, it aligns with reason, follows logical rules, and fits within a coherent framework. Descartes, in his Meditations, sought "clear and distinct ideas" as the foundation for certain knowledge, moving beyond mere doubt and subjective perception.
Common Sense (Practical Sense): While sometimes conflated with opinion, true common sense, as discussed by thinkers like Thomas Reid, refers to fundamental truths or principles that are intuitively grasped by most rational individuals and serve as a basis for practical judgment and shared understanding. It's not just "what everyone thinks," but what reason and experience generally confirm.

Aspect	Opinion	Sense
Nature	Subjective belief, personal judgment	Objective understanding, reasoned apprehension
Basis	Feelings, biases, limited information	Evidence, logic, experience, coherence
Verifiability	Difficult or impossible	Amenable to testing, justification
Goal	Expression of self	Pursuit of truth, knowledge
Reliance	Personal conviction	Universal principles, shared reality

From Mere Belief to Justified Knowledge

The journey from opinion to knowledge is precisely where sense becomes indispensable. An opinion, however strongly held, remains an opinion until it is subjected to the scrutiny of sense – tested against evidence, evaluated for logical consistency, and situated within a coherent framework.

The Role of Justification: For an opinion to transition into knowledge, it must be a true belief that is also justified. This justification comes from the rigorous application of sense. For example, an opinion that "the sun will rise tomorrow" becomes knowledge not merely because it's true, but because it's justified by centuries of observation (empirical sense) and our understanding of celestial mechanics (rational sense).
The Socratic Method: Socrates famously challenged Athenians to move beyond their unexamined opinions to a deeper, reasoned understanding. His method was essentially an exercise in applying sense to reveal the inconsistencies and lack of foundation in widely held beliefs, thereby clearing the path for genuine knowledge.

Why the Distinction Matters: Navigating a Complex World

In an age saturated with information and diverse viewpoints, the ability to make this distinction between opinion and sense is more vital than ever.

Critical Thinking: It empowers individuals to evaluate claims critically, rather than accepting them at face value.
Informed Decision-Making: For personal choices or public policy, decisions grounded in sense (evidence, reason) are inherently more robust than those based solely on opinion.
Intellectual Honesty: Recognizing when one is merely expressing an opinion versus presenting a reasoned argument fosters intellectual humility and honesty.
Bridging Divides: While opinions can be divisive, seeking common ground through sense – shared facts, logical arguments – can facilitate understanding and progress.

Cultivating Critical Discernment

Developing the capacity to discern between opinion and sense is an ongoing philosophical practice. It involves:

Questioning Assumptions: Always ask: "What is this claim based on?"
Seeking Evidence: Demand justification and empirical support.
Applying Logic: Evaluate arguments for their internal consistency and coherence.
Considering Multiple Perspectives: Understand how different frameworks might interpret the same data, but always return to what makes rational sense.
Embracing Doubt (Methodical Doubt): As Descartes showed, a healthy skepticism can be the first step towards certainty.

Conclusion: The Foundation of Genuine Knowledge

The distinction between opinion and sense is not merely an academic exercise; it is a fundamental tool for navigating reality. Opinions, while personal and valuable for expression, remain subjective until they are rigorously tested and justified by the faculty of sense – whether through empirical observation, rational coherence, or logical reasoning. It is this disciplined application of sense that elevates mere belief to the realm of verifiable knowledge, forming the bedrock upon which genuine understanding and progress are built. To confuse the two is to risk building our world on shifting sands rather than solid ground.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Plato Allegory of the Cave explained"