The Distinction Between Opinion and Sense and Distinction

The Enduring Divide: Separating Opinion from Sense on the Path to Knowledge

The human mind is a complex landscape, often blurring the lines between what we merely think and what we genuinely perceive or understand. This article aims to clarify the crucial distinction between opinion and sense, a philosophical endeavor critical for anyone seeking genuine knowledge. We will explore how these concepts have been understood throughout the "Great Books of the Western World," revealing why their separation is fundamental to clear thought and meaningful discourse. In essence, opinion is a subjective belief, often unverified and prone to error, while sense, whether referring to sensory perception or sound judgment, provides a more grounded, albeit still often incomplete, connection to reality. The journey from fleeting opinion, through the crucible of sense, ultimately paves the way for the attainment of robust knowledge.

Unpacking the Realm of Opinion

Opinion, or doxa in the classical Greek tradition, is perhaps the most common currency of human interaction. It represents a personal belief, a viewpoint, or a judgment that may or may not be based on verifiable facts or reasoned argument.

Subjectivity and Variability: Opinions are inherently subjective. What one person believes to be true, beautiful, or good, another may vehemently disagree with. They are often influenced by personal experiences, emotions, cultural biases, and incomplete information.
Lack of Certainty: As Plato so eloquently argued in works like The Republic, opinions dwell in the realm of the changeable and the uncertain. They are not fixed points of truth but rather shifting sands, susceptible to persuasion, mood, and circumstance. An opinion can be passionately held, yet still be entirely false or unfounded.
The Problem of Unjustified Belief: A core characteristic of opinion is its often-unjustified nature. While one might believe something to be true, if that belief cannot withstand critical scrutiny, empirical evidence, or logical deduction, it remains merely an opinion.

The danger of conflating opinion with truth lies in its potential to hinder progress and perpetuate misunderstanding. When we treat all opinions as equally valid, we risk abandoning the pursuit of objective truth altogether.

The Grounding Force of Sense

The term "sense" carries a dual meaning in philosophical discourse, both of which stand in stark contrast to the fleeting nature of opinion.

1. Sense as Sensory Perception

This refers to our direct experience of the world through our five senses: sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell.

Empirical Foundation: Sensory perception provides the raw data of experience. As empiricists like John Locke argued, our minds are initially a tabula rasa, a blank slate, upon which sensory input writes the first characters of our understanding.
Direct Engagement with Reality: Unlike opinion, which can be entirely internal and detached from external reality, sensory experience offers a direct, albeit interpreted, engagement with the world around us. We see the tree, hear the bird, feel the warmth.
Limits of Sense: While crucial, sensory perception alone is not knowledge. Our senses can be deceived (illusions, mirages), and they only provide information about appearances, not necessarily the underlying essence or ultimate reality of things. Aristotle, while emphasizing the importance of observation, also recognized the need for reason to interpret and synthesize sensory data.

2. Sense as Sound Judgment or Reasoned Understanding

Beyond mere perception, "sense" can also refer to a kind of practical wisdom or good judgment – a coherent, rational grasp of a situation or concept.

Coherence and Logic: When we say something "makes sense," we imply that it is logical, coherent, and consistent with known facts or principles. This kind of sense moves beyond raw data to an organized understanding.
Foundation for Prudence: This aspect of sense is akin to Aristotle's concept of phronesis (practical wisdom), where experience and reason combine to make sound decisions and understand the practical realities of life. It's a grounded understanding that avoids the pitfalls of unexamined beliefs.

The Critical Distinction: Opinion vs. Sense

The following table highlights the fundamental differences between opinion and sense, particularly in their contribution to knowledge:

Feature	Opinion	Sense (Sensory Perception)	Sense (Sound Judgment)
Nature	Subjective belief, personal view	Direct empirical experience	Coherent, logical understanding
Basis	Emotion, bias, partial information, belief	Raw data from senses	Reason, experience, consistency
Verifiability	Often difficult or impossible to verify	Potentially verifiable by others	Testable against logic and evidence
Reliability	Low, prone to error, fleeting	Medium, can be deceived, limited scope	High, aims for consistency and truth
Goal	Expressing a personal view	Gathering raw information about the world	Forming a rational, grounded understanding
Contribution to Knowledge	Minimal, often a starting point for inquiry	Provides foundational data (requires interpretation)	Organizes data, identifies patterns, builds coherence

(Image: A classical Greek philosopher, perhaps Plato or Aristotle, stands before a group of students. One student points towards a fleeting shadow on a cave wall (symbolizing opinion), while another gazes intently at a geometrically perfect solid in the philosopher's hand (representing sense or reasoned form). The philosopher gestures upwards towards a radiant, abstract light, signifying the realm of pure Knowledge.)

The Ascent to Knowledge

Neither opinion nor mere sense, in isolation, constitutes knowledge. Knowledge, or episteme, is a higher state of understanding that transcends both. It is often defined as justified true belief.

From Opinion to Inquiry: Opinions can be a starting point for inquiry, prompting us to ask "Why do I believe this?" or "Is this truly so?" This questioning is the first step away from mere opinion.
From Sense to Interpretation and Reason: Sensory data, while essential, requires interpretation, analysis, and synthesis through reason. We don't just see a red apple; we understand it as a fruit, with certain properties, grown under specific conditions. This understanding moves beyond raw sensation.
The Role of Justification: Knowledge requires justification. It's not enough to believe something (opinion), or even to perceive it (sense); one must have good reasons, evidence, or logical arguments to support that belief. This is where the rigor of philosophy and science comes into play.
Universality and Stability: Unlike opinion, true knowledge aims for universality and stability. The laws of physics, mathematical theorems, or well-established historical facts are not subject to personal whim. They hold true regardless of individual belief.

The journey from opinion, through the critical evaluation of sense, and ultimately to justified knowledge is the very essence of philosophical pursuit. It demands intellectual humility, a willingness to question our own assumptions, and a commitment to seeking truth beyond the comfort of our personal beliefs.

Cultivating the Distinction

In an age saturated with information and diverse viewpoints, the ability to discern between opinion and sense, and to strive for knowledge, is more vital than ever.

Question Assumptions: Always ask: "What is this statement based on?" Is it personal feeling, anecdotal evidence, or verifiable fact?
Seek Evidence: Demand evidence and logical reasoning, not just assertion.
Consider Sources: Evaluate the credibility and potential biases of information sources.
Embrace Nuance: Recognize that complex issues rarely have simple, opinion-based answers. True understanding often involves grappling with multiple perspectives and intricate details.

By sharpening our ability to make this fundamental distinction, we not only elevate our own thinking but also contribute to a more reasoned and insightful public discourse, moving away from the cacophony of mere opinion towards the clarity of genuine knowledge.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Allegory of the Cave explained""