The Elusive Definition of Happiness: A Philosophical Journey

Summary: The universal human quest for happiness has yielded a myriad of definitions across millennia, from ancient Greek flourishing to modern utilitarian calculations. This article delves into the rich philosophical tapestry, drawing from the Great Books of the Western World, to explore how thinkers have grappled with happiness, contrasting it with mere pleasure and pain, and linking it intrinsically to notions of Good and Evil. Far from a simple feeling, happiness emerges as a profound concept, continually redefined through the lens of human experience and ethical inquiry.

Introduction: The Perennial Pursuit and Its Philosophical Roots

Since time immemorial, humanity has been united by a singular, overarching desire: to be happy. Yet, for all its universality as an aspiration, the definition of happiness remains one of philosophy's most enduring and contentious debates. Is it a fleeting sensation, a state of mind, a virtuous life, or something else entirely? To embark on this inquiry is to traverse the intellectual landscape of Western thought, a journey richly documented within the pages of the Great Books of the Western World. As Henry Montgomery, I find this pursuit not merely academic, but utterly fundamental to understanding ourselves and the societies we construct.

The challenge lies in moving beyond superficial understandings. We instinctively equate happiness with positive feelings, but philosophy compels us to ask: what kind of positive feelings? And are feelings alone sufficient, or must happiness encompass something more profound, more enduring, perhaps even objective?

Ancient Insights: From Flourishing to Tranquility

The earliest comprehensive attempts to define happiness emerged from the ancient Greek world, offering foundational perspectives that continue to resonate.

Plato and the Harmonious Soul

For Plato, true happiness was not merely personal gratification but an outcome of a well-ordered soul, a state of inner harmony where reason governs spirit and appetite. In works like The Republic, he posits that justice, both in the individual and the state, leads to the highest Good. An unjust person, despite external appearances, cannot truly be happy because their soul is in discord. Here, the definition of happiness is inextricably linked to virtue and the pursuit of the Good.

Aristotle's Eudaimonia: Living Well and Doing Well

Perhaps no philosopher has shaped the understanding of happiness more profoundly than Aristotle. In his Nicomachean Ethics, he introduces the concept of eudaimonia, often translated as "flourishing," "living well," or "doing well," rather than mere "happiness" as we often understand it today.

  • Eudaimonia is not merely pleasure: Aristotle explicitly distinguishes eudaimonia from fleeting pleasure. While pleasure can accompany virtuous activity, it is not the definition of happiness itself.
  • Activity of the Soul in Accordance with Virtue: For Aristotle, happiness is an activity, a way of living, specifically "an activity of the soul in accordance with complete virtue." It requires a lifetime of effort, practical wisdom (phronesis), and the cultivation of moral and intellectual virtues.
  • The Highest Good: Eudaimonia is the ultimate end, the highest Good for human beings, pursued for its own sake. All other goods (wealth, health, honor) are pursued because we believe they contribute to this flourishing.
  • External Goods: While virtue is primary, Aristotle acknowledges that certain external goods (friends, moderate wealth, good birth) are necessary to facilitate a life of virtuous activity.

Epicureanism: The Pursuit of Ataraxia

In contrast to Aristotle's active flourishing, Epicurus offered a different definition of happiness, focusing on tranquility and the absence of disturbance. For Epicureans, the highest good was ataraxia (freedom from mental disturbance) and aponia (absence of bodily pain).

  • Calculated Pleasure: Epicurus advocated for a life of simple pleasures, carefully chosen to maximize long-term contentment and avoid future pain. This was not hedonism in the crude sense, but a reasoned pursuit of peace.
  • Freedom from Fear: Much of Epicurean philosophy was dedicated to overcoming the fear of death and the gods, which were seen as primary sources of human anxiety and pain.
  • The Definition of Happiness: For Epicurus, happiness was a state of serene contentment, achieved by minimizing pain and disturbance, rather than aggressively pursuing intense pleasure.

Stoicism: Virtue as the Sole Good

The Stoics, like Zeno, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius, presented yet another powerful definition of happiness. For them, happiness (or eudaimonia) was achieved by living in accordance with nature and reason, accepting what cannot be controlled, and cultivating virtue as the sole Good.

  • Indifference to Externalities: External factors like wealth, health, and reputation were considered "indifferent" – neither good nor evil in themselves. True happiness stemmed from one's inner state and rational choices.
  • Control over Impressions: The Stoics emphasized controlling one's judgments and reactions to events, rather than the events themselves.
  • Virtue as Sufficient: Virtue was considered sufficient for happiness. A truly virtuous person could be happy even in the face of extreme adversity, as their inner good remained untouched.

Medieval and Modern Perspectives: Divine Purpose to Utilitarian Calculus

As Western thought evolved, so too did the definition of happiness, incorporating theological insights and later, scientific and social considerations.

Medieval Synthesis: Happiness in God

Thinkers like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas integrated classical philosophy with Christian theology. For them, ultimate happiness could not be found entirely in earthly life, which was inherently imperfect and finite.

  • The Beatific Vision: True, complete happiness was the Beatific Vision – the contemplation of God in the afterlife.
  • Imperfect Earthly Happiness: While earthly life could offer a degree of happiness through virtuous living and knowledge of God, it was always partial and incomplete, a foretaste of the ultimate Good.
  • The Highest Good: God became the ultimate Good, the source and end of all human striving for happiness.

The Enlightenment and the Pursuit of Happiness

The Enlightenment brought a shift, emphasizing individual rights and the secular pursuit of happiness. Philosophers like John Locke and Thomas Jefferson (in the American Declaration of Independence) enshrined "the pursuit of happiness" as an inalienable right, though its definition remained open to individual interpretation. This era often linked happiness to freedom, self-determination, and prosperity.

Utilitarianism: The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill proposed a consequentialist definition of happiness with Utilitarianism.

  • Hedonic Calculus: Bentham famously defined happiness as the maximization of pleasure and the minimization of pain. The moral worth of an action was determined by its capacity to produce the greatest good (happiness) for the greatest number of people.
  • Qualitative Pleasures (Mill): Mill refined Bentham's view, arguing that not all pleasures are equal. He distinguished between "higher" intellectual and moral pleasures and "lower" bodily pleasures, asserting that a life rich in the former leads to a more profound and lasting happiness.
  • The Definition of Happiness: For Utilitarians, happiness is fundamentally about the balance of pleasure over pain, but with Mill, it gains a qualitative dimension tied to human flourishing and moral development.

The Contemporary Conundrum: Subjectivity, Objectivity, and the Role of Good and Evil

Today, the definition of happiness continues to be debated. Psychology often focuses on subjective well-being, life satisfaction, and positive emotions. However, philosophy continues to push for deeper questions.

Is happiness purely a subjective feeling, unique to each individual? Or are there objective criteria – perhaps related to virtue, purpose, or contribution to the common Good – that must be met for a life to be truly considered happy? The interplay between Good and Evil remains central; a life devoted to malevolent acts, no matter how subjectively "satisfied" the perpetrator might feel, rarely fits a robust philosophical definition of happiness.

Key Distinctions in Defining Happiness

The journey through philosophical thought reveals several critical distinctions in the definition of happiness:

Aspect Philosophical Perspective 1 (e.g., Epicureanism) Philosophical Perspective 2 (e.g., Aristotelianism)
Nature of Happiness Absence of pain and mental disturbance (Ataraxia) Flourishing through virtuous activity (Eudaimonia)
Primary Focus Maximizing pleasure (sensory & intellectual) Cultivating virtue and practical wisdom
Role of Feelings Central, though moderated by reason Secondary; a byproduct of virtuous action
Relation to Good The Good is defined by what brings pleasure and avoids pain The Good is an objective state of flourishing achieved through virtue
Ethical Implications Individual pursuit of contentment Living a life of moral excellence and contribution

(Image: A detailed depiction of Plato and Aristotle standing together in a classical Greek setting, perhaps within Raphael's "The School of Athens" but cropped to focus on their figures and differing gestures – Plato pointing upwards towards the Forms, Aristotle gesturing horizontally towards the earthly world, symbolizing their distinct approaches to the nature of reality and the Good.)

Conclusion: An Ongoing Inquiry

The quest for the definition of happiness is not a solvable puzzle with a single, definitive answer. Instead, it is an ongoing philosophical inquiry, a reflection of humanity's evolving understanding of itself, its purpose, and its place in the cosmos. From the ancient pursuit of eudaimonia and the avoidance of pain, to the theological embrace of divine Good, and the modern calculus of pleasure, each era and each great thinker has contributed layers to this profound concept.

What emerges is a rich, multifaceted understanding that transcends simple emotional states. True happiness, as explored in the Great Books, often involves a deep engagement with life, an ethical compass pointing towards the Good, and a conscious effort to navigate the complexities of pleasure and pain. To truly define happiness, therefore, is to define what it means to live a truly human life – a question as relevant today as it was in the Agora of Athens.

Further Exploration:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Eudaimonia"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Epicureanism vs Stoicism Happiness"

Share this post