The Definition of Happiness and Definition

The Unfolding Tapestry: Seeking the Definition of Happiness

The quest to define happiness is perhaps one of humanity's most enduring and profound intellectual journeys. Far from a simple sentiment, happiness, when viewed through the lens of Western thought, emerges as a complex, multifaceted concept, demanding rigorous examination of our values, our actions, and our very purpose. This article delves into the rich philosophical tradition, drawing from the Great Books of the Western World, to explore how thinkers from antiquity to the modern era have grappled with this elusive definition, often contrasting it with the transient nature of pleasure and pain, and inextricably linking it to notions of good and evil.

The Elusive Quest: What Is Happiness?

From the bustling agora of ancient Athens to the quiet studies of Enlightenment philosophers, the question "What is happiness?" has echoed through the ages. It is a question that touches the very core of human existence, influencing our choices, shaping our societies, and inspiring our greatest works of art and philosophy. Yet, despite its universal appeal, arriving at a universally accepted definition remains a formidable challenge. Is it a fleeting emotion, a sustained state of being, or perhaps an ongoing process? The answer, as we shall see, depends heavily on the philosophical framework one adopts.

Ancient Wisdom: Eudaimonia and the Flourishing Life

The earliest and arguably most influential attempts to define happiness in the Western tradition come from the ancient Greeks. For figures like Plato and, most notably, Aristotle, happiness was not merely a feeling of contentment but rather a state of eudaimonia – a term often translated as "flourishing" or "living well."

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, posits that happiness (eudaimonia) is the highest human good, the ultimate end toward which all human activities are directed. It is not something achieved passively but actively, through the exercise of virtue.

Virtue Ethics and Eudaimonia:
- Activity of the Soul: Happiness is an activity of the soul in accordance with complete virtue. It requires developing excellent character traits (courage, temperance, justice, etc.).
- Rationality: Humans are rational beings, and true happiness involves living in accordance with reason.
- Complete Life: Happiness is not a momentary state but requires a complete life lived virtuously. One cannot be called happy until their life is complete.

This ancient definition places happiness firmly in the realm of objective well-being, distinct from subjective feelings. It suggests that one can be happy even amidst hardship, provided one lives virtuously and rationally.

The Dynamics of Pleasure and Pain: A Different Path to Happiness

While Aristotle linked happiness to virtue, other schools of thought placed the experience of pleasure and pain at the center of their definition.

Epicurean Tranquility

Epicurus and his followers believed that happiness was primarily the absence of pain in the body and disturbance in the soul (ataraxia). For them, the highest good was pleasure, but this was not a hedonistic pursuit of fleeting sensory gratification. Instead, it was a calm, sustained state of contentment achieved through moderation, friendship, and philosophical reflection. They distinguished between kinetic pleasures (active, intense, often leading to pain) and katastematic pleasures (static, tranquil, like the absence of thirst).

Utilitarian Calculation

Centuries later, the Utilitarians, particularly Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, further developed the role of pleasure and pain in defining happiness. For them, the "greatest happiness principle" dictated that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Happiness was understood as pleasure and the absence of pain. Mill, in particular, argued for qualitative differences in pleasures, suggesting that intellectual and moral pleasures were superior to mere bodily ones.

This table summarizes key perspectives on Pleasure and Pain in relation to Happiness:

Philosophical School	Primary Focus on Pleasure/Pain	Definition of Happiness
Epicureanism	Absence of bodily pain & mental disturbance	Ataraxia (tranquility) and aponia (absence of pain)
Utilitarianism	Maximizing overall pleasure, minimizing pain	The greatest good for the greatest number; pleasure and absence of pain
Aristotelianism	Pleasure as a byproduct, not the goal	Eudaimonia, achieved through virtuous activity

The Moral Compass: Happiness and the Fabric of Good and Evil

Can one be truly happy if one's actions are morally reprehensible? This profound question links the definition of happiness inextricably to the concepts of good and evil.

Plato, in his Republic, forcefully argues that a just person is always happier than an unjust person, regardless of external circumstances. True happiness, for Plato, is bound up with the harmony of the soul, which can only be achieved through justice and the pursuit of the Good.

Immanuel Kant offered a different, yet equally profound, connection. For Kant, while happiness is a natural human desire, it cannot be the ultimate foundation of morality. Morality must be based on duty and the good will, acting purely from respect for the moral law. However, Kant did introduce the concept of the summum bonum (the highest good), which is the union of virtue and happiness. He believed that while we cannot guarantee happiness through our virtue in this life, a rational moral agent must postulate a moral order (and God) where virtue is ultimately rewarded with happiness. This suggests that true happiness, in its fullest sense, cannot exist in isolation from moral rectitude.

A Tapestry of Definitions: A Summary of Philosophical Stances

The journey through the Great Books of the Western World reveals a rich diversity in the definition of happiness:

Aristotle (Virtue Ethics): Eudaimonia – flourishing through virtuous activity in accordance with reason over a complete life.
Epicurus (Hedonism/Tranquility): Ataraxia – the absence of mental disturbance and bodily pain, achieved through moderation and philosophical reflection.
Stoicism (Virtue/Reason): Apatheia – freedom from disturbing passions, achieved by living in harmony with nature and reason, accepting what cannot be changed. Virtue is the sole good.
John Stuart Mill (Utilitarianism): The greatest good for the greatest number; happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain, with higher pleasures valued more.
Immanuel Kant (Deontology): While not the direct aim of morality, happiness is the natural consequence of a virtuous life, forming part of the summum bonum alongside moral worthiness.

The Modern Predicament: Subjectivity, Science, and the Ongoing Definition

In contemporary thought, the definition of happiness continues to evolve, often grappling with the tension between subjective experience and objective well-being. Psychology and neuroscience now contribute to our understanding of happiness, exploring its biological and cognitive underpinnings. Yet, the fundamental philosophical questions remain: Is happiness a feeling we experience, a state we achieve, or a journey we undertake? Is it a personal pursuit, or does it have a collective dimension, intrinsically linked to the good and evil within society?

The enduring legacy of the Great Books reminds us that the definition of happiness is not a static pronouncement but an ongoing conversation, a dynamic inquiry that shapes our understanding of what it means to live a truly fulfilling human life.

(Image: A detailed illustration depicting a diverse group of historical philosophers, including Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, and Kant, engaged in animated discussion around a central, glowing question mark. Scrolls and open books lie scattered around them, symbolizing the "Great Books." The background features a subtle blend of ancient Greek architecture and a more stoic, rationalist environment, representing the span of Western thought. The philosophers' expressions convey deep thought, debate, and the shared human endeavor to grasp an elusive concept.)

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Happiness Eudaimonia Explained""