The Definition of Happiness and Definition

The Enduring Quest: Defining Happiness Through the Ages

The pursuit of happiness is perhaps the most universal human endeavor, a constant thread woven through the tapestry of human experience. Yet, despite its omnipresence, a singular, universally accepted definition of happiness remains elusive. This article delves into the rich philosophical landscape, primarily drawing from the Great Books of the Western World, to explore how thinkers have grappled with this profound concept, examining its intricate relationship with pleasure and pain, and the weighty implications of good and evil. We will journey through ancient wisdom and enduring questions to illuminate the multifaceted nature of what it truly means to live a happy life.

The Ancient Foundations: Eudaimonia and Flourishing

For many of the great minds of antiquity, particularly in ancient Greece, happiness was far more profound than fleeting joy or simple contentment. It was understood as eudaimonia (εὐδαιμονία), a term often translated as "flourishing," "living well," or "human flourishing." This concept forms the bedrock of much Western thought on the subject.

Aristotle's Vision: Happiness as an Activity of the Soul

In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle posits that happiness is the summum bonum, the highest good, the ultimate end towards which all human activities are directed. He argues that happiness is not a static state or a mere feeling, but rather:

An activity of the soul in accordance with virtue (arete): It's about living a life of purpose and excellence, consistently acting virtuously.
A complete life: True happiness requires not just momentary virtuous acts, but a sustained pattern of living that allows one to realize their full potential over a lifetime.
Self-sufficiency: A truly happy person is not overly dependent on external goods, though some external goods (health, friends, moderate wealth) can certainly facilitate virtuous activity.

Aristotle meticulously distinguished eudaimonia from mere pleasure. While pleasure might accompany virtuous activity, it is not the goal itself. A life devoted solely to sensory pleasure, he argued, is a life fit for cattle, not for rational beings.

Plato's Harmony: Justice and the Well-Ordered Soul

Plato, Aristotle's teacher, also connected happiness intrinsically to the moral and intellectual health of the individual. In The Republic, he argues that a just person, whose soul is ordered harmoniously with reason ruling over spirit and appetite, is inherently happier than an unjust person, regardless of external circumstances. For Plato, happiness is a direct consequence of internal balance and adherence to the Forms of Goodness and Justice.

Divergent Paths: Stoics and Epicureans

While sharing the Greek emphasis on living well, other schools offered different routes to eudaimonia:

The Stoics: For philosophers like Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius, happiness lay in virtue alone and living in harmony with nature and reason. External events, including pain and misfortune, were considered indifferent (adiaphora) and should not disturb one's inner tranquility (apatheia). True happiness was found in controlling one's reactions and judgments, not external circumstances.
The Epicureans: Epicurus, often misunderstood as advocating hedonism, defined happiness as ataraxia (freedom from disturbance of the soul) and aponia (absence of bodily pain). His philosophy was not about wild indulgence, but about cultivating sophisticated pleasures – primarily intellectual and social – and carefully avoiding sources of pain. He understood pleasure not as a frantic pursuit, but as a calm and steady state.

(Image: A detailed classical Greek frieze depicting various figures engaged in philosophical discourse, contemplation, and civic activity, symbolizing the multifaceted pursuit of eudaimonia through intellectual endeavor, virtue, and community life.)

Pleasure and Pain: Allies, Adversaries, or Distractions?

The relationship between happiness and the experience of pleasure and pain has been a central point of contention throughout philosophy. Is happiness simply the maximization of pleasure and the minimization of pain?

Philosophical Stance	View on Pleasure	View on Pain	Connection to Happiness
Hedonism (e.g., crude Epicureanism, some Utilitarianism)	The ultimate good; primary goal.	To be avoided; antithetical to good.	Happiness is the sum total of pleasures minus pains.
Eudaimonism (Aristotle, Plato)	A natural accompaniment to virtuous activity, but not the goal itself.	Can be experienced, but does not negate happiness if one acts virtuously.	Happiness is flourishing through virtue; pleasure is a byproduct.
Stoicism	Indifferent; not inherently good or bad.	Indifferent; not inherently good or bad.	Happiness is internal tranquility and virtue, independent of pleasure or pain.
Epicureanism (nuanced)	Calm, stable pleasure (absence of pain/disturbance) is the highest good.	Absence of pain (aponia) is a key component of happiness.	Happiness is ataraxia (peace of mind) and aponia.

The Great Books reveal that while the allure of pleasure is undeniable, many philosophers caution against making it the sole measure of happiness. They argue that a life dedicated purely to pleasure often leads to dissatisfaction, as pleasures are fleeting and can distract from deeper, more meaningful pursuits. Conversely, the endurance of pain or hardship, when faced with courage and virtue, can sometimes contribute to a more profound sense of self-worth and purpose, rather than diminishing overall happiness.

Good and Evil: The Moral Compass of Happiness

Can one truly be happy if one is evil? This fundamental question links the definition of happiness inextricably to ethics and morality.

Virtue Ethics (Plato, Aristotle): For these giants, the answer is a resounding no. True happiness (eudaimonia) is intrinsically linked to living a virtuous life. To be good is to act in accordance with reason and moral excellence. An evil person, by definition, lacks the internal harmony and virtuous character necessary for genuine flourishing, regardless of external success or pleasure. Their soul is disordered, and this internal discord prevents true happiness.
Theological Perspectives (Aquinas): Thomas Aquinas, building on Aristotle and Christian doctrine, saw ultimate happiness not merely in earthly flourishing but in the contemplation of God, the Summum Bonum (Highest Good). For Aquinas, true and perfect happiness (beatitudo) is unattainable in this life due to human imperfection and sin. Imperfect happiness is achievable through virtuous living and divine grace, but ultimate happiness is found in the beatific vision in the afterlife. The pursuit of good aligns with God's will and leads towards this ultimate bliss, while evil distances one from it.
Consequentialism (Utilitarianism): While not directly linking individual virtue to individual happiness in the same way as the ancients, utilitarianism (as seen in John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism) connects good actions to the greatest happiness for the greatest number. An action is good if it promotes overall happiness and minimizes suffering. In this framework, actions considered evil would be those that diminish overall happiness.

The consistent theme is that a life devoid of moral substance, one characterized by evil actions, cannot ultimately lead to genuine, lasting happiness. The internal corruption, the disharmony with reason, or the negative impact on others inevitably undermines the very foundation upon which true happiness is built.

The Elusive Conclusion: A Personal and Philosophical Endeavor

As we trace the philosophical lineage from the ancient Greek conception of eudaimonia through the nuanced discussions of pleasure and pain and the moral imperative of good and evil, a definitive, singular definition of happiness remains a moving target. What emerges, instead, is a rich tapestry of understanding:

Happiness is rarely a static state but an ongoing process of living, striving, and experiencing.
It is deeply intertwined with purpose, meaning, and the cultivation of character.
It requires a nuanced understanding of pleasure and a steadfast commitment to virtue.

Ultimately, the definition of happiness is not merely an academic exercise but a deeply personal one, informed by centuries of philosophical inquiry. To truly pursue happiness is to engage in a lifelong journey of self-reflection, ethical action, and the continuous quest for what it means to live a truly flourishing life.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

📹 Related Video: ARISTOTLE ON: The Nicomachean Ethics

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Happiness Explained"
2. ## 📹 Related Video: STOICISM: The Philosophy of Happiness