The Elusive Essence: Defining the Citizen

What does it truly mean to be a citizen? Is it merely a legal status bestowed by a state, a collection of rights and responsibilities codified by law? Or does the definition of a citizen delve deeper, touching upon our very identity, our participation in the common good, and our relationship with the wider human community? This pillar page explores the multifaceted and evolving definition of a citizen, tracing its philosophical journey from the ancient Greek polis to the complexities of the modern globalized world, drawing insights from the enduring wisdom of the Great Books of the Western World. We'll discover that while the legal framework provides a clear boundary, the philosophical understanding of citizenship remains a vibrant, ongoing dialogue.

The Ancient Roots of Citizenship: Polis and Participation

Our journey into the definition of a citizen invariably begins in ancient Greece, where the concept was profoundly tied to active participation in the life of the polis—the city-state. Here, citizenship was not a given for all residents but a privileged status demanding engagement.

Aristotle's "Politics": The Active Participant in the State and Law

Perhaps no one articulated the ancient Greek understanding of citizenship more thoroughly than Aristotle in his seminal work, Politics. For Aristotle, a citizen was not merely someone who resided in a state or enjoyed legal protection. Instead, he proposed a far more demanding definition:

"He who has the power to take part in the deliberative or judicial administration of any state is said by us to be a citizen of that state."

This means a true citizen was one who actively participated in the governance of the state, in making and enforcing its laws. This wasn't a passive role; it was about contributing to the political life of the community. Slaves, women, and foreigners, despite living within the polis, were excluded from this definition because they lacked this deliberative power.

Key Characteristics of Ancient Greek Citizenship (Aristotle's View):

  • Active Participation: Direct involvement in assemblies and courts.
  • Deliberative Capacity: The ability to reason and contribute to public discourse.
  • Rule and Be Ruled: Understanding the dual nature of civic life.
  • Exclusivity: Limited to a select group, typically free-born males.

Plato's Ideal Citizen: Duty to the Polis

While Plato, in works like The Republic, focused more on the ideal state and the proper education for its rulers, his philosophy implicitly shapes the definition of a citizen by emphasizing duty and the harmonious functioning of the whole. For Plato, the individual's purpose was inextricably linked to the well-being of the polis. A good citizen was one who understood their role within the social structure and performed it virtuously, contributing to the justice and stability of the state through adherence to its laws and the pursuit of wisdom.

(Image: A detailed depiction of the Athenian Agora during the classical period, showing citizens engaged in lively debate and discussion around public buildings, with the Parthenon visible in the background. The scene emphasizes civic participation and the open exchange of ideas.)

From Subject to Sovereign: Medieval and Early Modern Transformations

The fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of feudalism shifted the focus from the active citizen of the polis to the subject bound by loyalty to a lord or monarch. However, the Enlightenment brought a revolutionary re-evaluation of the individual's relationship with the state, fundamentally altering the definition of a citizen.

The Shift from Feudal Allegiance to National Identity

During the medieval period, identity was often tied to local allegiances, religious faith, and one's place in a hierarchical social order. The concept of a universal citizen within a unified state was largely absent. It was with the emergence of nation-states and the decline of absolute monarchies that the modern definition of a citizen began to take shape, emphasizing a shared national identity and a direct relationship with the sovereign power, no longer mediated solely by feudal lords.

Hobbes and Locke: The Social Contract and the Basis of the State

The philosophical underpinnings of modern citizenship were profoundly shaped by the social contract theorists.

  • Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan): In his grim assessment of the "state of nature," Hobbes argued that individuals willingly surrender some freedoms to an absolute sovereign (the State) in exchange for order and security. Here, the definition of a citizen is primarily that of a subject whose obedience to law ensures survival, albeit with limited rights.
  • John Locke (Two Treatises of Government): Locke presented a more optimistic view, suggesting that individuals possess inherent natural rights (life, liberty, property) that pre-exist the state. Citizens, under a social contract, consent to be governed, but the state's power is limited by its obligation to protect these rights. If the state fails, citizens have the right to resist. This introduces the idea that a citizen is not just a subject, but an individual with fundamental rights and a conditional obligation to the state and its laws.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in The Social Contract, took the concept of citizenship further, positing that true freedom lies in obeying laws that we ourselves have a hand in creating. For Rousseau, the definition of a citizen is intrinsically linked to popular sovereignty and the "general will."

"Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will, and, in our corporate capacity, we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole."

Here, a citizen is an active participant in the collective sovereignty, simultaneously subject to the law and the author of it. This ideal emphasizes civic virtue, equality, and a profound commitment to the common good of the state.

Modern Interpretations: Rights, Responsibilities, and Global Context

Today, the definition of a citizen is often understood through a dual lens: the legal and the philosophical. While legal definitions provide clarity, the philosophical questions about the ideal citizen persist.

Legally, a citizen is typically defined as a person who is recognized under the law as a legal member of a sovereign state or commonwealth. This status usually confers specific rights (e.g., voting, protection abroad) and obligations (e.g., paying taxes, military service). This definition is often determined by birthright (jus soli or jus sanguinis) or naturalization.

However, the philosophical ideal extends beyond mere legal status. It asks:

  • What constitutes good citizenship?
  • How do we balance individual rights with collective responsibilities?
  • What is our moral obligation to the state and its laws?

The contemporary discourse often distinguishes between active and passive citizenship.

Aspect Passive Citizen Active Citizen
Primary Focus Rights and protections provided by the state Participation, engagement, and responsibility
Engagement with Law Obeys law to avoid penalty Understands and contributes to the formation of law
Relationship to State Consumer of state services and protections Co-creator and shaper of the state and its future
Example Behaviors Voting occasionally, paying taxes Volunteering, civic activism, informed debate

This distinction echoes Aristotle's emphasis on participation. While legal citizenship grants rights, active citizenship embodies the spirit of engagement, critical thought, and contribution to the public sphere, ensuring the vitality of the state.

The Challenges of a Globalized World: Are We All Citizens of the World?

In an increasingly interconnected world, the traditional definition of a citizen tied solely to a nation-state faces new challenges. Concepts like "global citizenship" emerge, suggesting an ethical framework where individuals recognize their responsibilities to humanity as a whole, transcending national borders.

This doesn't necessarily negate national citizenship but rather broadens its scope, encouraging a sense of shared responsibility for global issues like climate change, human rights, and poverty. While not a legal definition in the same way as national citizenship, global citizenship offers a philosophical ideal for navigating our shared future.

Conclusion: An Ongoing Dialogue

The definition of a citizen is far from static. From the deliberative Athenian to the rights-bearing subject of the Enlightenment, and now to the potentially globally-minded individual, the concept has continuously evolved. It remains a rich philosophical terrain, forcing us to ask fundamental questions about our identity, our relationship with power, our duties under law, and our role in shaping the state and the world. To be a citizen is to be part of an ongoing dialogue, a participant in the profound human endeavor of self-governance and shared existence.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Politics Citizenship Explained""
2. ## 📹 Related Video: KANT ON: What is Enlightenment?

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Social Contract Theory Hobbes Locke Rousseau Explained""

Share this post