The Enduring Question: What Truly Defines a Citizen?

The concept of a citizen is far more than a mere legal status; it is a profound philosophical construct that has shaped societies and individual identities for millennia. At its definition's heart lies the intricate relationship between an individual and their State, governed by Law, and underpinned by a complex web of rights and responsibilities. From the bustling polis of ancient Greece to the sprawling nation-states of today, the meaning of citizen has evolved, adapted, and been fiercely debated, reflecting humanity's continuous quest for belonging, justice, and self-governance. This exploration delves into the historical and philosophical underpinnings of citizenship, drawing from the wisdom of the Great Books of the Western World to illuminate its multifaceted nature.

The Ancient Roots: Citizenship in the Polis

To understand the definition of a citizen, we must first journey back to its origins in ancient Greece, particularly as articulated by Aristotle. In his seminal work, Politics, Aristotle grappled extensively with who qualifies as a citizen within the context of the polis (city-state).

The Polis and the Participating Citizen: Aristotle's Vision

For Aristotle, a citizen was not merely an inhabitant or someone subject to the Law of the State. His definition was far more active and demanding:

"A citizen is one who shares in the administration of justice and in the holding of office."

This active participation in deliberative and judicial functions was paramount. It implied:

  • Active Engagement: Citizens were expected to participate directly in the assembly, debate public policy, and serve on juries. This wasn't a passive role; it was the very essence of citizenship.
  • Rule and Being Ruled: The ideal citizen had the capacity to both govern and be governed, understanding the principles of justice and public good.
  • Exclusion: Crucially, Aristotle's definition excluded many: women, slaves, resident aliens (metics), and manual laborers. Their necessary contributions to the polis did not grant them the full status of citizen. The Law of the polis reflected and enforced these distinctions.

While Plato, in his Republic, focused more on the functional specialization within the ideal State where each individual (including its "citizens") performs their designated role for the harmony of the whole, Aristotle's emphasis on active political participation remains a foundational definition that contrasts sharply with later understandings.

Shifting Sands: From Subject to Sovereign

The transition from the ancient polis to the rise of empires and eventually nation-states brought about a profound re-evaluation of the definition of a citizen. The focus shifted from direct participation in a small community to a more complex relationship with a larger, more centralized State.

The Rise of the Individual: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau

The Enlightenment era, in particular, witnessed a radical reimagining of the individual's place within society, heavily influencing the concept of citizenship.

  • Thomas Hobbes and the Sovereign's Subject: In Leviathan, Hobbes presented a stark vision where individuals, driven by self-preservation, surrender their natural rights to an absolute sovereign in exchange for peace and order. The citizen here is primarily a subject, bound by the Law established by the sovereign. The definition of a citizen is thus largely one of obedience and protection, with little emphasis on active political participation beyond consenting to the social contract. The State's power is paramount.

  • John Locke and Rights-Bearing Individuals: Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, offered a more optimistic view. He argued that individuals possess inherent natural rights (life, liberty, property) that pre-exist the State. Citizens form a social contract to protect these rights, establishing a government whose legitimacy rests on the consent of the governed. Here, the definition of a citizen is an individual endowed with rights, capable of reason, and participating in government through representation. The Law is meant to uphold these rights, and citizens have a right to resist tyranny if the State oversteps its bounds.

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the General Will: Rousseau, in The Social Contract, pushed the definition of citizen further towards collective sovereignty. For him, true citizenship means actively participating in the creation of the "General Will" – the collective good of the community. Citizens are both subjects (obeying the Law) and sovereigns (creating the Law). This definition emphasizes civic virtue, direct democracy, and the idea that freedom is found in obedience to self-imposed Law. The State is legitimate only when it reflects the General Will of its citizens.

Table 1: Evolution of Citizenship Perspectives

Philosopher/Era Key Concept of Citizen Relationship with the State Role of Law
Aristotle Active participant in judicial & deliberative office Integral to the polis; direct engagement Upholds the structure of the polis and justice
Hobbes Subject under an absolute sovereign Sacrifices rights for protection; passive Sovereign's command; instrument of order
Locke Individual with natural rights; consenting party Grants legitimacy to government; represented Protects natural rights; binds ruler and ruled
Rousseau Co-creator of the General Will; both subject & sovereign Embodies the collective will; direct participation Expression of the General Will; self-imposed

Modern Complexity: Rights, Responsibilities, and Identity

As societies progressed into the era of nation-states, the definition of a citizen became increasingly tied to nationality, often determined by birthright (jus soli or jus sanguinis) or naturalization. Today, the concept is far more encompassing than in ancient times, yet it continues to face new challenges.

Beyond Borders and Birthright: Contemporary Challenges to the Definition

The contemporary definition of a citizen generally includes a set of civil, political, and social rights, alongside corresponding duties.

  • Rights: These typically include freedom of speech, assembly, religion, the right to vote, access to education, healthcare, and due process under the Law.
  • Responsibilities: These often involve obeying the Law, paying taxes, serving in the military (where applicable), and participating in civic life.

However, the modern world introduces complexities:

  • Dual Citizenship: Many individuals hold citizenship in more than one State, complicating allegiances and legal obligations.
  • Statelessness: Millions lack citizenship in any State, rendering them vulnerable and without fundamental rights.
  • Global Citizenship: The rise of global challenges (climate change, pandemics) has prompted discussions about a broader definition of citizenship that transcends national borders, emphasizing shared human responsibilities.
  • Digital Citizenship: In the digital age, new forms of participation and responsibility are emerging online, prompting questions about how our online identities and actions relate to our offline citizenship.

The definition of a citizen is thus a dynamic interplay between national identity, international human rights, and evolving societal expectations. The Law continues to be the primary framework, but philosophical inquiry constantly pushes its boundaries.

(Image: A detailed allegorical painting depicting a diverse group of people from different historical periods and cultures, engaged in various acts of civic duty and deliberation. In the foreground, an ancient Greek philosopher gestures towards a scroll while a Roman citizen debates with a modern-day activist. A subtle background shows cityscapes evolving from a classical polis to a bustling contemporary metropolis, symbolizing the continuous evolution of the State and the citizen.)

The Enduring Philosophical Question

From the active participant in Aristotle's polis to the rights-bearing individual of Locke and the sovereign co-creator of Rousseau, the definition of a citizen has been a crucible for philosophical thought. It forces us to confront fundamental questions about human nature, justice, freedom, and the legitimate authority of the State. The Law serves as both a reflection and a shaper of this definition, codifying the boundaries and expectations of belonging.

Ultimately, the question of what truly defines a citizen remains an ongoing dialogue. It is a constantly negotiated space between individual autonomy and collective responsibility, between inherited status and active participation, and between national identity and a growing awareness of global interconnectedness. As societies continue to evolve, so too will our understanding of this foundational concept, compelling us to revisit the wisdom of the past to navigate the complexities of the future.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Politics Citizenship Explained""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Social Contract Theory: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Compared""

Share this post