The Intertwined Roots: Exploring the Connection Between Sin and Desire

Summary: The essence of human morality often hinges on the intricate dance between our inherent desires and the choices we make. This article delves into the profound connection between sin and desire, arguing that while desire itself is a fundamental aspect of human existence, it is the misdirection or uncontrolled assent of the will to disordered desires that ultimately paves the path to moral transgression. Drawing upon the rich tapestry of thought from the Great Books of the Western World, we will explore how philosophers have grappled with this perennial challenge, from ancient Greek notions of appetite to Christian concepts of a wounded will.

The Primal Urge and Its Peril: An Introduction

From the moment of consciousness, humanity is driven by an array of internal longings. We desire sustenance, companionship, knowledge, beauty, and myriad other things. This faculty of desire is not inherently evil; indeed, it is the engine of life, progress, and even virtue. Yet, history and personal experience alike attest to the profound capacity for these same desires to lead us astray, to commit acts that are recognized as sinful across cultures and epochs. How does this transformation occur? How does a natural impulse become the genesis of moral failing? The answer lies in understanding the complex interplay between our appetites and the faculty of the will.

Understanding Desire: More Than Mere Want

To truly grasp the connection to sin, we must first articulate what desire means within a philosophical framework.

  • Desire as Appetite: At its most basic, desire is an appetite, an inclination, a longing for something perceived as good or pleasurable. Plato, in his Republic, famously divides the soul into three parts: reason, spirit, and appetite. The appetitive part is responsible for our basic bodily needs and pleasures.
  • Desire for the Good: Many philosophers, from Plato to Aristotle and Aquinas, posited that all desire is ultimately for the good, or at least for what is perceived as good. The problem arises when we pursue a lesser good as if it were the ultimate good, or when we pursue a good in a disordered manner, at the expense of a greater good or moral principle.
  • Disordered Desire: This is where the tension begins. An otherwise natural desire, such as for food or wealth, becomes disordered when it becomes excessive, exclusive, or leads to injustice. Saint Augustine, a towering figure in the Great Books, vividly distinguished between cupiditas (selfish, earthly desire) and caritas (selfless, divine love), framing much of human struggle as the battle between these two poles of desire.

It is crucial to note that the mere presence of a desire is not sin. It is the assent to a disordered desire that marks the critical juncture.

Defining Sin: A Philosophical Lens

While often associated with religious doctrine, the concept of sin has deep philosophical roots, referring to a transgression against a moral order, whether that order is conceived as rational, natural, or divine.

  • Transgression Against Reason: For many Greek thinkers, particularly Aristotle, sin could be understood as "missing the mark" – failing to achieve the mean of virtue, often due to an imbalance of passions or desires. It is acting against what reason dictates as the correct course.
  • Transgression Against Natural Law: The Stoics and later Christian philosophers like Aquinas saw sin as a deviation from natural law, which is discoverable by reason and reflects the inherent order of the cosmos.
  • Transgression Against Duty: Immanuel Kant, in the modern era, posited that moral acts are those performed out of duty, not inclination. To act purely on desire, even if the outcome is good, lacks true moral worth; to act against duty due to desire is a moral failing.

In essence, sin in a philosophical context is an act, thought, or omission that violates a recognized moral standard, often stemming from an internal misalignment or a failure of self-governance.

The Will: The Crucible of Choice

The true connection between desire and sin is forged in the crucible of the will. The will is the faculty of choice, the power to assent to or reject the various impulses and desires that arise within us.

The Will's Role:

  1. Arbitration: The will acts as an arbiter between conflicting desires and between desire and reason.
  2. Assent/Dissent: It is the will that gives its consent to a particular desire, translating it into an intention and then an action.
  3. Responsibility: Because the will is free (in most philosophical traditions), it bears the responsibility for the choices made.

Augustine, in particular, emphasized the centrality of the will. For him, sin is not simply being overcome by desire, but a defect of the will, a turning away from the higher good towards a lesser good. He famously stated, "I did it, not because I had to, but because I willed to." The struggle is internal: the will, though capable of choosing the good, is often weakened or swayed by insistent, disordered desires.

Philosophical Currents on Desire and Sin

The Great Books offer diverse perspectives on this enduring problem:

Ancient Greek Insights

  • Plato's Chariot Allegory: In the Phaedrus, Plato likens the soul to a charioteer (reason) guiding two winged horses: one noble (spirit, aiming for honor) and one unruly (appetite, driven by base desires). Sin, or moral failure, occurs when the charioteer loses control, allowing the unruly horse of appetite to dictate the direction.
  • Aristotle and Akrasia: Aristotle explored akrasia, or incontinence, the phenomenon of knowing what is good but acting against it due to strong desire. This highlights the struggle between reason and appetite, where the will fails to execute reason's command.

Christian Scholasticism

  • Augustine's Wounded Will: Augustine’s profound introspection in Confessions reveals sin as a turning away from God, a misdirection of love, rooted in a wounded will. Original sin, in his view, introduced a profound bias toward cupiditas, making the will prone to choosing lesser goods.
  • Aquinas on Voluntary Acts: Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotle and Christian theology, viewed sin as a voluntary act against right reason, often stemming from disordered appetite. He meticulously broke down the process from apprehension of a good (real or apparent) to the consent of the will and the final action.

Modern Perspectives

  • Kant's Duty vs. Inclination: Immanuel Kant provided a rigorous framework where moral worth is derived from acting out of duty, not from mere inclination or desire. While desires are natural, they are morally neutral; they only become problematic when they lead one to act against the moral law. Sin, in this context, is choosing to act on an inclination that violates a universalizable moral maxim.

The Dynamics of Connection: How Desire Becomes Sin

Desire itself is a neutral force. It is the process by which the will engages with desire that determines its moral outcome.

Stage Description Role of Will
1. Impulse/Desire An inclination or longing arises within the individual (e.g., for pleasure, power, comfort). The will is initially passive, simply experiencing the desire. At this stage, there is no sin.
2. Contemplation/Assent The mind considers the desire, evaluating its object and potential consequences in light of reason and moral principles. The will is presented with a choice. Crucial Moment: The will actively chooses to either assent to the desire (even if disordered) or to resist it. This is where moral responsibility is engaged. Choosing a disordered desire is the genesis of sin.
3. Action/Transgression If the will assents to a disordered desire, it translates this choice into a concrete action, thought, or omission that violates a moral standard. The will is active in executing the chosen path. The sin is completed through this voluntary act.

(Image: A detailed depiction of a classical sculpture, possibly Roman or Greek, showing a figure in a state of intense internal conflict. One hand might be grasping their head in anguish, while the other is reaching out, perhaps towards a forbidden fruit or an alluring object, symbolizing the pull of desire. The figure's face should express a tension between rational thought and overwhelming impulse, with shadows playing across their features to deepen the sense of moral struggle.)

This table illustrates that sin is rarely a sudden, unbidden event. It is often a culmination of a process where the will fails to properly govern or redirect desire.

Understanding the connection between sin and desire is the first step towards ethical living. The philosophical tradition offers several pathways for navigating this internal labyrinth:

  • Self-Knowledge: Understanding one's own desires, their strengths, and their potential for disorder.
  • Discipline and Temperance: Cultivating virtues that moderate appetites and bring them into harmony with reason.
  • Cultivation of Reason: Strengthening the rational faculty to properly discern true goods from apparent goods, and to guide the will effectively.
  • Moral Education: Learning from the wisdom of the past, as preserved in texts like the Great Books, to inform one's choices and shape one's moral character.

Conclusion: The Enduring Challenge

The relationship between sin and desire is one of the most fundamental and enduring inquiries in philosophy. While desire is an indispensable part of human nature, it is the will's susceptibility to disordered desires that provides the vital connection to moral transgression. From Plato's charioteer to Augustine's wounded will and Kant's emphasis on duty, the Great Books of the Western World consistently highlight the profound human challenge: to harmonize our powerful internal longings with the dictates of reason and the pursuit of genuine good. The ongoing task for each individual remains to master this internal landscape, ensuring that desire serves rather than subverts the path to virtue.

YouTube Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine Confessions Will Desire Sin"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aristotle Akrasia Incontinence Ethics"

Share this post