The Entangled Roots: Exploring the Connection Between Sin and Desire
Summary: The intricate connection between sin and desire has been a cornerstone of philosophical and theological inquiry for millennia. Far from being a simple cause-and-effect relationship, this connection reveals a profound interplay wherein desire, a fundamental human drive towards perceived goods, becomes the raw material upon which the will acts, often leading to actions or states of being deemed sinful when that desire is disordered, misdirected, or elevated above higher goods. Across the Great Books of the Western World, thinkers grapple with how our natural inclinations can lead us astray, highlighting the crucial role of the will in either assenting to or resisting these powerful urges.
Unpacking the Essence of Desire
To understand the connection between sin and desire, we must first define what we mean by desire. In the classical sense, desire (from the Greek orexis or Latin desiderium) is a natural inclination, an appetitive movement towards something perceived as good or lacking. Plato, in works like The Republic, speaks of desires as originating from different parts of the soul – the appetitive part for bodily pleasures, the spirited part for honor, and the rational part for truth. Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, similarly categorizes desires and emphasizes that while natural desires are essential for life, they must be governed by reason to achieve virtue and eudaimonia (flourishing).
Not all desires are created equal, nor are they inherently problematic. We desire food, companionship, knowledge, beauty – these are often natural and healthy. The philosophical challenge arises when desires become:
- Disordered: Seeking a lesser good over a greater one.
- Excessive: Pursuing a good beyond what is reasonable or necessary.
- Misdirected: Seeking a good in a way that harms oneself or others.
- Autonomous: Operating independently of reason or moral judgment.
It is in these permutations that the seed of sin often finds fertile ground.
The Genesis of Sin: When Desire Goes Astray
The connection between desire and sin is not that desire is sin, but rather that sin often arises from a particular orientation or pursuit of desire. Medieval philosophers, particularly St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, extensively explored this dynamic, drawing heavily on earlier Greek thought while integrating a Christian theological framework.
For Augustine, writing in Confessions and The City of God, sin fundamentally stems from a disordered love – specifically, amor sui (self-love) elevated above amor Dei (love of God). This isn't merely about personal preference but about prioritizing temporal, earthly desires over eternal, divine ones. The will, corrupted by original sin, finds itself inclined towards lower goods, mistakenly believing they will bring ultimate satisfaction. Desire, in this Augustinian view, becomes a powerful force pushing the will towards these lesser, often fleeting, pleasures, leading to a turning away from God.
Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotle with Christian doctrine in his Summa Theologica, views sin as a voluntary transgression against divine law, a "turning away from God." While desire (concupiscence) is a natural movement of the sensitive appetite, it becomes problematic when the will assents to desires that contradict right reason or divine command. For Aquinas, sin is not merely the presence of desire, but the will's deliberate choice to pursue a good in a way that is contrary to the ultimate good, often swayed by the intensity of particular desires for pleasure, wealth, or power.
(Image: A classical painting depicting an individual in internal conflict, perhaps with two allegorical figures representing Reason and Passion whispering into their ears, set against a backdrop of diverging paths – one leading towards light and order, the other towards shadows and chaos. The individual's face shows deep contemplation and struggle.)
The Indispensable Role of the Will
Central to the connection between sin and desire is the concept of the will. Desire provides the impulse, the attraction to a perceived good; the will is the faculty that chooses whether to pursue or resist that impulse.
Consider these perspectives on the will's role:
- Plato/Aristotle: While they didn't have a distinct concept of "will" in the modern sense, they recognized the rational part of the soul's ability to guide or restrain the appetitive part. Sin (or moral failing) occurs when reason fails to control desire, leading to akrasia (weakness of will) or vice.
- Augustine: The will is the engine of moral action, but it is fundamentally flawed. It desires what it desires, and if it desires disordered things, it acts sinfully. Freedom of the will is the freedom to choose, but true freedom is choosing the good.
- Aquinas: The will is a rational appetite, always desiring what is perceived as good. Sin arises when the intellect presents a lesser good as an ultimate good, and the will freely chooses it over the true, greater good, often influenced by strong sensory desires.
- Kant: In his ethical framework, moral actions are those performed out of duty, guided by the rational will, rather than inclination or desire. To act purely from desire, even if the outcome is good, lacks moral worth. Sin, for Kant, would be a failure of the will to act according to the moral law, succumbing instead to empirical desires.
The table below illustrates how different philosophical traditions emphasize the interplay:
| Philosophical Tradition | View of Desire | Role of the Will | Connection to Sin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient Greeks | Natural appetites, need guidance by reason. | Rational soul's capacity to control appetite. | Sin (vice) as failure of reason to govern desire. |
| Augustine | Powerful, often disordered due to original sin. | Corrupted, prone to choosing lesser goods (amor sui). | Sin as a turning away from God due to disordered love. |
| Aquinas | Natural movement towards perceived good (concupiscence). | Rational appetite, chooses based on intellect's presentation of good. | Sin as voluntary choice of a lesser good over a greater one. |
| Kant | Inclination, distinct from moral duty. | Autonomous, acts according to moral law (duty). | Sin as failure of the will to act from duty, succumbing to inclination. |
The Enduring Struggle
The connection between sin and desire is thus a complex philosophical tapestry woven through centuries of thought. It is not about demonizing desire itself, which is a vital part of human experience, but rather about understanding how desire, when ungoverned by reason, virtue, or divine law, can lead the will towards actions and states of being that are considered sinful. This internal struggle – the tension between our powerful inclinations and our capacity for rational, moral choice – remains a central theme in the human condition, inviting continuous reflection on how we orient our deepest longings.
YouTube Video Suggestions:
-
📹 Related Video: What is Philosophy?
Video by: The School of Life
💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine Confessions Desire Sin Will Philosophy"
2. ## 📹 Related Video: ARISTOTLE ON: The Nicomachean Ethics
Video by: The School of Life
💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aquinas Summa Theologica Concupiscence Sin Will"