The Connection Between Law and Justice and Connection

The Indissoluble Yet Elusive Connection Between Law and Justice

By Daniel Sanderson

The relationship between law and justice is one of philosophy's most enduring and fundamental inquiries. At first glance, they appear inextricably linked, almost synonymous; surely, the purpose of law is to establish and maintain justice. Yet, history and philosophical discourse reveal a more complex, often fraught, connection. This article explores how these two concepts, while deeply intertwined, are distinct, how the State endeavors to align them, and the perpetual challenges inherent in that pursuit, drawing insights from the timeless wisdom found in the Great Books of the Western World.

A Direct Summary: The Symbiotic Struggle

The connection between law and justice is foundational to any civilized State. While law provides the codified rules and enforcement mechanisms, justice represents the moral ideal of fairness, equity, and righteousness. Ideally, law serves as the practical instrument for achieving justice. However, the two are not identical. Laws can exist without being just, and the pursuit of justice often necessitates questioning or reforming existing laws. The State plays a critical role in enacting, interpreting, and enforcing laws with the explicit aim of upholding justice, navigating the delicate balance between order and fairness.

The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice

From antiquity, thinkers have grappled with the nature of law and justice. The Great Books of the Western World offer a rich tapestry of perspectives that illuminate this enduring connection.

Ancient Greek Insights: Order and Virtue

Plato's Ideal State: In The Republic, Plato posits justice as the harmonious functioning of society, where each part performs its proper role. For Plato, the laws of the State should be designed to cultivate this harmony, reflecting a higher, unchanging form of justice. An unjust law would, by definition, disrupt this natural order.
Aristotle's Practical Justice: Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, distinguishes between different forms of justice:
- Distributive Justice: Concerned with the fair allocation of honors, wealth, and goods according to merit.
- Corrective Justice: Aims to restore balance when an injustice has occurred, often through punishment or compensation.
- He saw law as "reason unaffected by desire," a necessary tool for achieving these forms of justice within the polis. The law, by being general, provides a stable framework, though Aristotle acknowledged the need for equity to temper its rigidity in specific cases.

Roman and Medieval Codification: The Rule of Law

The Romans were master builders of legal systems, viewing law as the bedrock of their vast empire. Their emphasis on codified law (e.g., the Twelve Tables, Justinian's Corpus Juris Civilis) aimed to provide clear, consistent rules, thereby ensuring a degree of predictable justice. This move from custom to written law was a monumental step in solidifying the State's power to define and enforce what was considered just.

Later, Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology in Summa Theologica, articulated a hierarchy of law:

Eternal Law: The divine reason governing the universe.
Natural Law: Accessible through human reason, reflecting eternal law.
Human Law: The positive laws enacted by the State.
Aquinas argued that human law derives its legitimacy and binding force from its alignment with natural law. An unjust human law (one that contradicts natural law) is, in a sense, "no law at all" and does not bind the conscience. This profoundly impacted the connection between morality, law, and justice.

The State's Mandate: Enforcing Justice Through Law

The concept of the State itself is often justified by its role in maintaining order and dispensing justice. Social contract theorists, prominently featured in the Great Books, explored this connection:

Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan): Argued that law and a powerful sovereign State are essential to escape the "state of nature," where justice is non-existent. For Hobbes, law creates justice by defining right and wrong, and the State's authority is absolute in enforcing it, even if it might appear harsh, to prevent chaos.
John Locke (Two Treatises of Government): Posited that individuals possess natural rights (life, liberty, property) that pre-exist the State. The State is formed to protect these rights through laws, and its legitimacy rests on its ability to uphold justice by safeguarding these fundamental entitlements. When the State acts unjustly, it forfeits its authority.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (The Social Contract): Envisioned law as an expression of the "general will," aiming for the common good. For Rousseau, laws made by the people themselves, for the people, are inherently just, as they reflect the collective interest in freedom and equality.

(Image: A classical depiction of Lady Justice, blindfolded and holding scales in one hand and a sword in the other, standing firmly on a globe, symbolizing impartiality, balance, and the power of enforcement, with a scroll representing codified law unrolled at her feet.)

The Persistent Discrepancy: When Law Fails Justice

Despite the ideal, history is replete with instances where law and justice diverge. Unjust laws – those that perpetuate inequality, oppression, or violate fundamental human dignity – underscore the critical distinction.

Consider the dilemma presented in Sophocles' Antigone, where human law (Creon's decree) clashes with a higher, unwritten law (the divine right to bury the dead). Antigone's defiance highlights the moral imperative to resist laws perceived as profoundly unjust, challenging the State's claim to absolute authority in defining justice.

The struggle to align law with justice is an ongoing process for any State. It requires:

Continuous Reflection: Societies must constantly evaluate their laws against evolving moral standards and ideals of fairness.
Judicial Interpretation: Courts play a vital role in interpreting laws in a way that promotes justice, often applying principles of equity where strict legalism might lead to an unfair outcome.
Democratic Participation: In democratic societies, citizens have the power to advocate for new laws or the repeal of old ones that are deemed unjust, ensuring the State remains accountable to the ideal of justice.

Conclusion: The Enduring Quest for a Just Legal Order

The connection between law and justice is not a static given, but a dynamic, often tension-filled relationship. Law provides the framework, the structure, and the enforceable rules that a State uses to govern its citizens. Justice, however, is the moral compass, the ideal towards which law should always strive. The Great Books of the Western World demonstrate that from ancient city-states to modern nations, the quest for a legal system that truly embodies justice remains a central project of human civilization. It is a continuous dialogue, a constant refinement, and an unwavering commitment to ensuring that the laws we create serve the highest principles of fairness and human dignity.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

📹 Related Video: PLATO ON: The Allegory of the Cave

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Plato Republic Justice Summary"
2. ## 📹 Related Video: ARISTOTLE ON: The Nicomachean Ethics