The Enduring Dialectic: Unpacking the Citizen's Relationship to the State

The relationship between the Citizen and the State is perhaps one of the most fundamental and enduring questions in political philosophy, a complex tapestry woven from threads of obligation, freedom, power, and justice. From the bustling agora of ancient Athens to the digital forums of today, humanity has grappled with the delicate balance between individual autonomy and collective governance. This article delves into the historical philosophical underpinnings of this relationship, exploring the crucial roles of Law and Duty, and acknowledging the dynamic nature of this essential bond. It is a conversation that continues to shape our societies and define our very understanding of what it means to live together.

The Genesis of Governance: Why Do We Have a State?

Before we can understand the Citizen's relationship to the State, we must first ponder the State's very existence. Why do individuals, inherently free, submit to an overarching authority? The Great Books of the Western World offer myriad perspectives.

  • Ancient Conceptions: For thinkers like Plato and Aristotle, the State (or polis) was seen as a natural extension of human sociality, essential for achieving the "good life" or eudaimonia. Aristotle, in his Politics, famously declared man to be a "political animal," suggesting that our full potential can only be realized within a well-ordered community. The Citizen was intrinsically linked to the welfare of the State, with their identity often subsumed within it.
  • The Social Contract Tradition: A significant shift occurred with the advent of social contract theories. Philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, each with their distinct nuances, posited that the State arises from a voluntary (though sometimes implicit) agreement among individuals.
    • Hobbes' Leviathan: Imagined a "state of nature" as a "war of all against all," where life was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." To escape this, individuals surrender some freedoms to an absolute sovereign State in exchange for security and order. Here, the Citizen's primary Duty is obedience to Law to prevent chaos.
    • Locke's Two Treatises of Government: Proposed a more optimistic state of nature, governed by natural Law. Individuals enter society to protect their natural rights (life, liberty, property). The State's legitimacy rests on its ability to uphold these rights, and the Citizen retains a right to resist tyranny.
    • Rousseau's The Social Contract: Argued that individuals surrender their natural liberty to gain civil liberty, becoming part of the "general will." The Citizen is both a subject of the State and a co-creator of its Laws, participating in sovereignty.

These foundational ideas highlight that the State is not merely a coercive entity but, in many interpretations, a necessary framework for human flourishing, peace, or the protection of rights.

The Binding Force: Law and its Authority

At the heart of the Citizen-State relationship lies Law. It is the mechanism through which the State asserts its authority and defines the parameters of acceptable behavior for its Citizens.

  • Law as Order: From the earliest codes (like Hammurabi's) to modern constitutions, Law serves to maintain order, resolve disputes, and provide a predictable framework for social interaction. Without Law, the State cannot function, and the Citizen's rights and Duties would be arbitrary.
  • Source of Law: The authority of Law has been debated for millennia:
    • Divine Law: Rooted in religious or divine command (e.g., Aquinas's concept of eternal law).
    • Natural Law: Inherent moral principles discoverable through reason, preceding human-made Law (e.g., Locke).
    • Positive Law: Human-made Laws enacted by a legitimate sovereign or legislative body, regardless of their moral content (e.g., Hobbes, Bentham).
  • The Citizen's Engagement with Law: For the Citizen, Law is not just a set of prohibitions but also a guarantor of freedoms. It delineates what the State can and cannot do, protecting individuals from arbitrary power. However, it also imposes Duties—to obey, to pay taxes, to serve—creating a reciprocal relationship.

(Image: A classical relief sculpture depicting Lady Justice, blindfolded and holding scales and a sword, flanked by figures representing the rule of law and civic virtue. The intricate details of the carving emphasize the enduring ideals of fairness and order in governance, with citizens observing respectfully in the background.)

Duty and Dissent: The Citizen's Moral Compass

The concept of Duty is central to the Citizen's relationship with the State. It encompasses the moral or legal obligations owed by the individual to the collective. But what happens when these Duties conflict with a Citizen's conscience or perceived higher moral Law?

| Type of Duty | Description

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Citizen's Relationship to the State philosophy"

Share this post