The Unfolding Covenant: Understanding the Citizen's Relationship to the State

The relationship between the Citizen and the State is one of philosophy's most enduring and complex questions, a dance between individual autonomy and collective order. It is a bond forged in mutual expectation, defined by Law, and sustained by a delicate balance of rights and Duty. Far from a static arrangement, this relationship is a living entity, constantly negotiated and reinterpreted through history, philosophy, and the lived experiences of individuals within a political community. From ancient city-states to modern republics, thinkers have grappled with the fundamental questions: Why do we submit to authority? What do we owe the State, and what does the State owe us? This article delves into these profound inquiries, drawing upon the rich tapestry of ideas found within the Great Books of the Western World.

Foundations of the Bond: Ancient Echoes of Duty

The earliest philosophical inquiries into the Citizen's connection to the State often highlighted the paramount importance of the collective good and the individual's inherent Duty to uphold it.

Plato and the Unquestioning Citizen

In Plato's Crito, we witness Socrates, condemned to death, refusing to escape prison despite the urging of his friends. His reasoning provides a powerful early articulation of the Citizen's Duty to the Law and the State. Socrates argues that by living in Athens, he implicitly agreed to abide by its laws, entering into a social contract. To disobey now, even if the judgment was unjust, would be to undermine the very fabric of the State itself. He saw the Law not merely as a set of rules, but as the parent and master of the Citizen, deserving of obedience. His unwavering commitment underscores the idea that the State, through its laws, provides the framework for a civilized life, and thus demands a profound sense of loyalty and Duty from its Citizens.

Aristotle: Man as a Political Animal

Aristotle, in his Politics, posits that humans are by nature "political animals" (zoon politikon). For Aristotle, the State (or polis) is not merely a convenience but a natural and necessary institution for human flourishing. It is within the State that individuals can achieve their full potential, practicing virtue and leading a good life. The Citizen's relationship to the State is therefore organic and intrinsic; one cannot truly be human outside of a political community. This perspective emphasizes a deep, almost biological, connection, where the well-being of the Citizen is inextricably linked to the well-being of the State.

Centuries later, the Enlightenment philosophers revisited the relationship, introducing the concept of the social contract as the theoretical basis for legitimate governmental authority. This marked a shift towards understanding the State as a creation of rational individuals, rather than a natural or divinely ordained entity.

Key Social Contract Thinkers

| Philosopher | Core Idea of the State's Origin

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Citizen's Relationship to the State philosophy"

Share this post