The Cause of Sin and Moral Error
Summary: Delving into the intricate philosophical question of sin and moral error, this article argues that their fundamental cause lies not in an external force, but primarily within the human will. While factors like ignorance, imperfect understanding, and the allure of lesser goods contribute, it is the conscious, albeit often flawed, exercise of our freedom—our will—that ultimately chooses against reason and duty, leading to moral transgression.
Unveiling the Labyrinth of Transgression: What Drives Sin and Error?
From the Garden of Eden to the modern courtroom, the concept of sin and moral error has plagued humanity, prompting endless philosophical and theological inquiry. It's a question that cuts to the very core of our being: why do we, as rational creatures, so often deviate from what we know to be right? What is the ultimate cause of this persistent moral failing? As Daniel Fletcher, I invite you to join me in navigating this complex terrain, drawing upon the enduring wisdom enshrined in the Great Books of the Western World to illuminate this profound human dilemma.
Defining the Beast: The Nature of Sin Beyond Simple Rule-Breaking
Before we can pinpoint the cause, we must first understand what we are seeking to explain. Sin, in the philosophical sense, is more than just breaking a commandment or violating a social norm. It represents a fundamental misalignment of the will with the dictates of reason, a turning away from the highest good towards a lesser one, or even a perceived evil.
- Augustine of Hippo, in his profound reflections, particularly in Confessions and City of God, views sin not as a substance, but as a privation of good, a defect of the will that chooses lesser goods over the supreme Good. It is a perverse imitation of God, a desire for self-sufficiency that ultimately leads to emptiness.
- Thomas Aquinas, building upon Aristotle, sees sin as an act that deviates from right reason and the eternal law. It is an act of the will directed towards a particular good, but one that is not in conformity with the ultimate end of human nature.
This understanding moves us beyond a superficial view of transgression and directs our gaze inward, towards the mechanisms of human choice.
Tracing the Root: The Intricate Causes of Moral Deviation
If sin is a deviation, what impels us down that path? The Great Books offer several compelling perspectives, often converging on the pivotal role of the human will.
The Primacy of the Will: The Ultimate Cause of Sin
At the heart of nearly every philosophical account of sin lies the concept of the will. It is our capacity for free choice, our ability to assent or dissent, to choose one course of action over another.
- Augustine's groundbreaking insight was to firmly place the cause of moral evil in the free will. God created all things good, thus evil cannot originate from God. Instead, evil is a defect of the will, a turning away from the immutable good towards mutable goods. It's not that the will is evil in itself, but that it chooses wrongly.
- René Descartes, though not directly addressing sin in a theological sense, highlights the expansive nature of the will in relation to the intellect. Our ability to choose is far broader than our capacity to understand, leading to the possibility of error when the will assents to something not fully comprehended.
It is this profound freedom, this awesome power of choice, that makes us morally accountable and, paradoxically, opens the door to sin.
Ignorance and Imperfection: Contributing Factors, Not Ultimate Causes
While the will is the primary agent, other factors often contribute to moral error.
- Ignorance: The Socratic dictum that "no one knowingly does evil" suggests that evil stems from a lack of knowledge, an imperfect understanding of the true good. If we truly knew what was good, we would always choose it.
- However, later philosophers, notably Augustine and Aquinas, nuanced this. While ignorance can be a cause of error, it often does not fully excuse sin, especially if the ignorance itself is vincible (i.e., could have been overcome). We sometimes choose to remain ignorant, or our passions cloud our intellect.
- Passion and Appetite: The pull of desires, emotions, and physical appetites can often override rational judgment, leading the will astray. Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics, elaborates on the struggle between reason and appetite, and how a lack of practical wisdom (phronesis) can lead to poor choices.
These factors, though influential, are often seen as conditions that influence the will, rather than being the cause of sin in themselves. The will still retains its power to choose, even in the face of strong passions or incomplete knowledge.
The Allure of Lesser Goods: A Perverse Choice
Ultimately, the cause of sin often boils down to choosing a perceived good over a true good, or a lesser good over a greater one.
- Aquinas clarifies that the will always moves towards what it perceives as good. No one wills evil as evil. Rather, we choose an object or action because it appears good in some respect (e.g., pleasure, power, comfort), even if it is morally wrong or detrimental in the long run. The sin lies in the disordered affection, the elevation of a mutable, particular good above the immutable, universal Good.
The Counterbalance: Duty, Reason, and the Path to Rectitude
Understanding the cause of sin also illuminates the path to moral rectitude. If the will is the primary agent, then the cultivation of a rightly ordered will is paramount.
The Imperative of Duty: Anchoring the Will
The concept of duty provides a powerful framework for moral action, guiding the will towards universalizable principles.
- Immanuel Kant, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals and Critique of Practical Reason, famously argues that moral action is that which is done from duty, not merely in conformity with it. A moral act is performed out of respect for the moral law itself, independent of consequences or personal inclinations.
- For Kant, the cause of moral error is often the will being swayed by heteronomous motives (desires, inclinations) rather than autonomously choosing to act according to the categorical imperative. Embracing duty means aligning the will with pure practical reason.
Cultivating Conscience and Practical Wisdom
Beyond abstract duty, the development of an informed conscience and practical wisdom serves as a bulwark against sin. Regular self-examination, critical reflection on one's motives, and a continuous pursuit of knowledge about the good are essential.
A Philosophical Synthesis: The Interplay of Causes
To consolidate our understanding, consider the following framework for the cause of sin and moral error:
| Primary Cause | Contributing Factors | Mitigating/Guiding Principles |
|---|---|---|
| The Free Will | Ignorance (vincible) | Reason and Intellect |
| (Choice against reason) | Unruly Passions/Appetites | Conscience and Moral Judgment |
| Allure of Lesser Goods (disordered affection) | Moral Law and Duty (e.g., Kant's Imperative) | |
| Habituation to vice (weakens the will over time) | Cultivation of Virtue (e.g., Aristotle's phronesis) |
Conclusion: The Enduring Challenge of the Human Will
In conclusion, the cause of sin and moral error, as explored through the lens of the Great Books, is a multifaceted phenomenon, yet one that consistently points back to the human will. While ignorance, passion, and the seductive appeal of lesser goods play significant roles, they primarily act upon or through the will. It is our profound capacity for choice, our freedom, that ultimately bears the responsibility for our moral deviations. The ongoing philosophical challenge, therefore, is not merely to understand this cause, but to cultivate a will that consistently aligns itself with reason, duty, and the pursuit of the highest good, thus striving towards a life of genuine moral rectitude.
📹 Related Video: KANT ON: What is Enlightenment?
Video by: The School of Life
💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine Free Will Evil"
YouTube: "Kant Moral Duty Explained""