Our understanding of the world, and indeed our very beliefs, are not simply handed to us. They are meticulously, often unconsciously, constructed through the constant interplay between what we encounter and how we process it. This article explores the profound connection between experience and the formation of opinion, delving into how our raw sense perceptions are refined by judgment to shape the convictions we hold. From the fleeting impression to the deeply held belief, the journey from encounter to opinion is a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry, echoing through the pages of the Great Books of the Western World.

The Groundwork of Belief: Sense and Experience

At the most fundamental level, our interaction with reality begins with our senses. Sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell are the primal conduits through which information from the external world floods into our consciousness. As Aristotle meticulously detailed in works like De Anima, these sense perceptions are the building blocks. A child learns that fire is hot not through abstract reasoning, but through the direct, undeniable experience of its warmth or burn.

However, mere sensation is not enough to form a coherent understanding, let alone an opinion. A kaleidoscope of colors is not an opinion; it is a raw sensory input. It is through repeated encounters, through the accumulation and retention of these sensations, that experience begins to coalesce. We don't just see a red object once; we see many red objects, and through this accumulation, we form the concept of "redness" and, eventually, more complex understandings. This process of moving from particular sensations to general concepts is a crucial step, laying the empirical foundation for all subsequent thought.

The Crucible of Judgment: Forging Opinion

Here lies the crux: the transformation of raw experience into considered opinion is primarily the work of judgment. Judgment is the cognitive faculty that evaluates, compares, synthesizes, and concludes based on the data provided by our senses and accumulated experience. It's the moment we move beyond simply perceiving "a red apple" to thinking "this apple looks ripe, and therefore likely sweet."

Philosophers across the ages have grappled with this intricate process:

  • Plato, in his Republic, famously distinguished between doxa (opinion) and episteme (true knowledge). For Plato, opinion, while derived from experience of the sensible world, could be unreliable and mutable, often based on appearances rather than unchanging Forms. Yet, it was the starting point, the initial engagement with the world that could, through rigorous dialectic and philosophical judgment, lead to higher truths.
  • Aristotle emphasized the role of practical wisdom (phronesis), which is a form of excellent judgment born of experience. It's the ability to deliberate well about what is good and advantageous for oneself and others, not in an abstract sense, but in specific situations. His inductive method, moving from observed particulars to general principles, is a testament to the power of structured experience and careful judgment.
  • John Locke, a key figure in British Empiricism, argued in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding that all our ideas, and consequently our opinions, derive from experience – either sensation (external objects affecting our senses) or reflection (the mind's observation of its own operations). For Locke, our judgment forms complex ideas by combining, comparing, or abstracting from these simpler ideas.

Image: A classical allegorical painting depicting a figure, perhaps a scholar or a personification of 'Thought,' seated amidst various sensory inputs – a vibrant landscape, a piece of fruit, a musical instrument – with a contemplative expression, while ethereal wisps or thought bubbles representing abstract ideas or judgments float above, illustrating the mind's active process of synthesizing raw sensory experience into coherent opinion.

The Subjectivity and Evolution of Opinion

It’s crucial to acknowledge that opinion, even when meticulously formed through judgment, carries an inherent subjectivity. Two individuals can undergo the exact same experience and arrive at different opinions. Why? Because their individual histories, pre-existing beliefs, emotional states, and the unique ways their judgment filters and interprets information will differ.

Consider David Hume, whose radical empiricism in A Treatise of Human Nature highlighted the limits of our ability to derive necessary connections solely from experience. He argued that our belief in cause and effect, for instance, is more a matter of custom and habit (a form of ingrained opinion based on repeated experience) than a logically necessary truth. Our judgment, in this view, builds patterns and expectations that shape our opinions about how the world works, even if those patterns lack absolute rational certainty.

Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Pure Reason, offered a synthesis, suggesting that while all knowledge begins with experience, it does not all arise from experience. Our minds, with their inherent categories of understanding, actively structure our sense perceptions. Judgment is thus not merely a passive recorder of experience, but an active organizer, shaping the raw data into coherent perceptions and, subsequently, forming our opinions about the world.

The Dynamic Nature of Our Beliefs

Our opinions are rarely static. They are constantly being tested, refined, and sometimes overturned by new experience and revised judgment. A new piece of information, a novel encounter, or even a profound shift in perspective can compel us to re-evaluate what we thought we knew. This dynamic process is the very engine of intellectual growth and philosophical inquiry.

The journey from initial sense perception to deeply held opinion is a testament to the complexity of human cognition. It underscores that our beliefs are not just intellectual constructs, but living entities, constantly shaped and reshaped by our continuous engagement with the world around us. To understand the formation of opinion is to understand a fundamental aspect of what it means to be human, always learning, always judging, always seeking to make sense of the vast ocean of experience.

YouTube: "Plato's Allegory of the Cave Explained"
YouTube: "John Locke's Empiricism and Ideas"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Experience and the Formation of Opinion philosophy"

Share this post