The Genesis of Transgression: Desire as the Root of Sin

Summary: In the grand tapestry of philosophical inquiry, few threads are as persistent and perplexing as the relationship between human desire and the phenomenon of sin. From the ancient Greeks to the medieval scholastics and beyond, thinkers have grappled with the idea that our deepest longings, when unchecked or misdirected, become the primary cause of moral transgression. This article explores how classical philosophy, particularly as articulated in the Great Books of the Western World, posits desire not merely as a temptation, but as the very wellspring from which sin often flows, mediated critically by the exercise of our will.

Unpacking Desire: A Double-Edged Blade

To understand desire as the cause of sin, we must first acknowledge its dual nature. Philosophers from Plato to Aquinas recognized that desire, in its most fundamental sense, is a natural inclination towards what is perceived as good. We desire food for sustenance, knowledge for understanding, beauty for aesthetic pleasure. These are not inherently sinful. Indeed, a life devoid of all desire would be a life without motivation, purpose, or even love.

However, the peril arises when desire becomes disordered. When our longing for a particular good overrides reason, disregards the greater good, or transgresses established moral and divine laws, it shifts from a natural inclination to a potential precipice of sin.

  • Natural Desires: Inclinations towards genuine goods (e.g., health, knowledge, community).
  • Disordered Desires: Inclinations towards goods in an inappropriate manner, at the wrong time, or to an excessive degree, leading to harm or injustice.

The Great Books often present this distinction through allegories and rigorous logical analysis. Plato, in The Republic, illustrates this with the tripartite soul: the appetitive part (desire), the spirited part (emotions), and the rational part (reason). When the appetitive part dominates, unchecked by reason, the individual falls into disharmony, which is a form of moral failing.

The Will: The Arbiter of Desire

If desire is the engine, then the will is the steering mechanism. The concept of free will is paramount in understanding how desire leads to sin. It is not the mere presence of a desire that constitutes sin, but the conscious choice to act upon a disordered desire, despite knowing it to be wrong or harmful.

Saint Augustine, a towering figure in the Great Books, delves deeply into the nature of the will in works like Confessions and City of God. For Augustine, sin is not merely an act but a turning away from the immutable Good (God) towards mutable, lesser goods. This "turning away" is an act of the will, corrupted by pride or disordered love. The will, in its freedom, chooses to yield to a desire that it knows is contrary to its true nature or divine law.

Element Description Role in Sin
Desire An inclination towards a perceived good. Can be natural or disordered. Provides the initial impetus or temptation.
Will The faculty of conscious choice and decision-making. Operates freely. Chooses whether to assent to or resist a desire, particularly a disordered one.
Reason The faculty of understanding, judgment, and moral discernment. Informs the will about the nature of desires and their moral implications.
Sin A transgression against moral or divine law; a deviation from the good. The outcome when the will assents to a disordered desire, overriding reason.

Image: A dramatic oil painting from the Baroque period, depicting a solitary figure at a crossroads, one path leading towards a sunlit, virtuous landscape and the other into a shadowy, tempting forest. The figure's face is etched with internal conflict, their hand hovering indecisively, symbolizing the human will grappling with divergent desires and the potential for sin.

Sin as the Consequence of Unchecked Longing

Ultimately, sin emerges as the direct consequence, or the effect, of desire when the will fails to properly govern it. Consider avarice: it begins as a natural desire for security or comfort, but when it morphs into an insatiable longing for wealth beyond measure, leading to exploitation or injustice, it becomes the cause of sinful acts. Similarly, lust, originating from the natural desire for procreation or intimacy, becomes sinful when it seeks gratification outside of morally sanctioned bounds, objectifying others or breaking covenants.

Thomas Aquinas, building upon Aristotle and Augustine, articulated how concupiscence—the inclination to sin arising from disordered desires—plays a significant role. Our sensory appetites, when unguided by reason and an upright will, can lead us towards actions that are contrary to our rational nature and divine law. The cause of the moral offense lies squarely in the will's assent to these unruly desires.

Philosophical Reflections on Desire and Sin

The exploration of desire as the cause of sin is a recurring motif across the philosophical traditions encapsulated in the Great Books.

  • Plato: Argued for the necessity of reason to control the appetitive soul, lest it lead to individual and societal corruption.
  • Aristotle: Emphasized the cultivation of virtues through habit, which involves rightly ordering our desires and emotions under the guidance of practical wisdom.
  • Augustine: Identified sin as a willful turning away from God, driven by disordered love for temporal goods rather than eternal ones.
  • Aquinas: Distinguished between natural desires and the sinful acts that arise when our appetites are not subjected to reason and divine law.
  • Kant: While focusing on duty, he acknowledged that inclinations (desires) often stand in opposition to moral duty, and true moral worth comes from acting out of duty, not inclination.

These thinkers, though diverse in their approaches, converge on a fundamental truth: the human experience is profoundly shaped by our desires, and our moral landscape is often defined by how we choose to respond to them. The battle against sin, therefore, is often an internal struggle to align our deepest longings with reason and the good.

Conclusion: The Enduring Challenge

The notion of desire as the primary cause of sin remains a powerful and relevant concept. It challenges us to look inward, to understand the origins of our impulses, and to exercise our will with wisdom and discernment. Far from condemning desire itself, philosophy invites us to cultivate a rightly ordered soul, where our longings serve the good, rather than leading us astray. This ongoing philosophical quest, deeply rooted in the Great Books of the Western World, continues to offer profound insights into the human condition and the perennial struggle for moral uprightness.

YouTube: "Augustine Confessions Free Will Sin"
YouTube: "Plato Republic Tripartite Soul Desire"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Desire as the Cause of Sin philosophy"

Share this post