The Serpent's Whisper: Examining Desire as the Root of Sin

Summary: Across the venerable pages of the Great Books of the Western World, a recurring philosophical and theological insight emerges: desire, in its various forms, stands as the fundamental cause of sin. This article explores how classical and Christian thinkers alike have illuminated the intricate relationship between our innate appetites and the moral transgressions that define human failing, often mediated by the crucial role of the will. From Plato's tripartite soul to Augustine's concupiscence, the journey into understanding sin invariably leads us back to the powerful, often unruly, currents of desire.

The Genesis of Transgression: An Enduring Inquiry

For millennia, humanity has grappled with the perplexing question of sin's origin. Is it an external force, a cosmic error, or something deeply embedded within the human condition? The enduring wisdom preserved in the Great Books offers a compelling answer: sin, in its most profound sense, often springs from the fertile ground of our own desires. It is not desire itself, perhaps, that is inherently corrupt, but rather its misdirection, its untamed nature, or its elevation above reason and divine law. This exploration delves into how thinkers from ancient Greece to the Scholastics identified desire as the potent catalyst, the primary cause, that propels the will towards actions deemed sinful.

Classical Echoes: Desire and the Disordered Soul

The ancients, though not always using the specific theological term "sin," certainly understood moral failing as a consequence of unchecked desire.

Plato and the Appetitive Soul

Plato, in works like The Republic, posited a tripartite soul:

  • Reason (Logistikon): The rational, calculating part, meant to rule.
  • Spirit (Thymoeides): The spirited part, allied with reason.
  • Appetite (Epithymia): The desiring part, encompassing bodily urges, pleasures, and material wants.

For Plato, true justice and virtue within the individual (and the state) depend on reason governing the appetites. When epithymia runs rampant, unchecked by reason, it leads to a disordered soul. This disorder, a kind of internal disharmony, is the classical equivalent of a moral failing or "sin." The pursuit of pleasure for its own sake, driven by insatiable desire, corrupts the individual, turning them away from the pursuit of truth and the Good. The will here is implicitly guided by reason, and its failure to control desire is the cause of imbalance.

Aristotle's Moderation of Passions

Aristotle, while acknowledging the naturalness of passions and desires, emphasized their proper moderation. In his Nicomachean Ethics, he argues that virtue lies in the mean between excess and deficiency. Desires are not inherently bad; they are part of human nature. However, succumbing to excessive desire (e.g., gluttony, lust) or failing to experience appropriate desire (e.g., apathy) leads to vice. The will, guided by practical reason, must choose the virtuous path, which often involves mastering or rightly directing one's desires. When the will fails to do so, it becomes the immediate cause of a moral lapse, a "sin" against the principle of the mean.

The Christian Paradigm: Concupiscence, Will, and the Fall

With the advent of Christian thought, the concept of sin takes on a profound theological dimension, and desire is firmly established as its primary terrestrial cause.

Augustine's Disordered Love

Saint Augustine, particularly in Confessions and City of God, stands as a towering figure in connecting desire to sin. For Augustine, after the Fall, humanity is afflicted with concupiscence – a disordered desire that pulls the will away from God. This is not merely physical lust but any inordinate craving for worldly goods or pleasures over spiritual ones. The original sin of Adam and Eve, itself an act of prideful desire for forbidden knowledge, corrupted the human will. Now, the will, though still possessing a degree of freedom, finds itself enslaved by these disordered desires. The cause of individual sins, therefore, is often the will's capitulation to these powerful, misdirected desires.

"For what is sin but the will to retain and obtain certain things which justice forbids?" – St. Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will

Aquinas and the Inordinate Appetite

Saint Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology in his Summa Theologica, further refines this understanding. He distinguishes between natural appetites (which are good) and inordinate appetites or desires. Sin, for Aquinas, is a voluntary act, a choice of the will to pursue a perceived good that is contrary to right reason and divine law. Often, this choice is prompted and swayed by an inordinate desire for a specific temporal good (e.g., wealth, pleasure, power) that is sought in a way that transgresses moral boundaries. Thus, while the will is the immediate agent of sin, the inordinate desire acts as the powerful antecedent cause, tempting the will to choose wrongly.

The Interplay of Desire, Will, and Sin: A Summary

The journey through the Great Books reveals a consistent and compelling narrative regarding the origins of sin.

Philosopher/Tradition View on Desire Role of Will Connection to Sin/Moral Failing
Plato Appetitive part (epithymia); source of bodily urges and material wants. Reason's control; meant to guide the will. Unchecked desire leads to internal disharmony, injustice, and moral failing.
Aristotle Passions and natural impulses; not inherently bad, but require moderation. Practical reason's moderation; the will chooses the virtuous mean. Excess or deficiency of desire, when chosen by the will, leads to vice.
Augustine Concupiscence; disordered love, pulling away from God post-Fall. Enslaved post-Fall; struggles against disordered desires. Corrupted will succumbs to disordered desires, making them the primary cause of individual sins.
Aquinas Natural appetites vs. inordinate desires; powerful motivators. Free choice; the will chooses an apparent good. Will chooses an apparent good contrary to reason and divine law, often swayed by inordinate desire.

In essence, while the will is the direct perpetrator of sin, it is often the powerful, sometimes overwhelming, force of desire that acts as its primary instigator and cause. Whether it is Plato's philosopher struggling with worldly temptations or Augustine's sinner battling concupiscence, the internal conflict between what we ought to do and what we desire to do remains the crucible in which sin is forged.

(Image: A classical oil painting depicting a solitary figure, perhaps a philosopher or a saint, seated in contemplation. Shadows play across their face, suggesting an inner struggle. One hand gestures subtly towards a distant, alluring light, while the other rests on a closed book, symbolizing reason or scripture. The background is muted, emphasizing the internal conflict between rational thought and the pull of worldly desires, subtly hinting at the genesis of sin.)

Conclusion: Mastering the Inner Landscape

The profound insights gleaned from the Great Books of the Western World offer a timeless understanding of the human condition. They consistently underscore that while external temptations may exist, the ultimate cause of sin is often an internal affair, rooted in the complex interplay between desire and the will. To understand sin, therefore, is to embark on a journey of self-knowledge, to learn to discern, moderate, and rightly direct our desires, allowing reason and higher principles to guide the will towards virtue rather than transgression. This ancient wisdom remains profoundly relevant, offering a roadmap for personal mastery and moral flourishing in any age.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine's Confessions on Desire and Free Will"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aristotelian Ethics on Virtue and Passion"

Share this post