Desire: The Enduring Cause of Sin in Western Thought

From the ancient Greeks to the medieval scholastics, Western philosophy has grappled with the perplexing origin of moral transgression. This article explores the profound concept that desire, when disordered or misdirected, stands as the primary cause of sin. Drawing upon the rich tapestry of the Great Books of the Western World, we will trace how philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas illuminate the intricate relationship between our inner longings and our moral failings, emphasizing the pivotal role of the will in this eternal struggle.

The Enduring Question: What Causes Us to Err?

Humanity's capacity for both immense good and profound evil has always fascinated thinkers. While external circumstances or ignorance can contribute to wrongdoing, a deeper, more intrinsic explanation often points inward: to the nature of our desires. Is sin merely a mistake of judgment, or does it spring from a more fundamental misalignment within the human soul? The philosophical tradition suggests the latter, positing that an uncontrolled or misdirected desire frequently acts as the true cause of our moral downfall.

Plato's Tripartite Soul: Desire's Early Roots

Plato, in his seminal work The Republic, offers one of the earliest and most influential models for understanding inner conflict. He posits a tripartite soul:

  1. Reason (Logistikon): The rational, calculating part, seeking truth and wisdom.
  2. Spirit (Thymoeides): The spirited part, associated with honor, courage, and righteous indignation.
  3. Appetite (Epithymetikon): The desiring part, encompassing bodily urges like hunger, thirst, and sexual longing, as well as the desire for wealth and material possessions.

For Plato, a harmonious soul is one where reason governs, aided by spirit, keeping the appetites in check. When the appetitive part—our base desires—usurps control, it leads to internal disorder, injustice, and actions that could be considered "sinful" in their deviation from virtue. Unchecked desire for pleasure or gain, therefore, becomes a direct cause of imbalance and moral error.

Aristotle and the Problem of Akrasia: When Desire Overpowers Will

Aristotle, building on Platonic foundations in his Nicomachean Ethics, delves into the phenomenon of akrasia, often translated as "incontinence" or "weakness of will." This occurs when an individual knows what is good and right, but nevertheless acts contrary to that knowledge, swayed by powerful desire.

Aristotle distinguishes between:

  • Temperance (Sophrosyne): The virtuous state where one's appetites are well-ordered and aligned with reason.
  • Intemperance (Akrasia): The state where desire for pleasure is so strong that it overcomes reason and the will, leading to a deliberate choice of a lesser good, despite knowing better.

Here, desire isn't merely a passive force; it actively competes with and can overpower the rational faculty, becoming the immediate cause of an action that reason would condemn. The will, though present, proves insufficient to resist the pull of appetite.

Augustine of Hippo: Disordered Love and the Cause of Sin

Perhaps no thinker has more profoundly explored the link between desire and sin than Saint Augustine of Hippo. In works like Confessions and City of God, Augustine posits that sin is not merely a lack of good, but a positive turning away from God, the ultimate good. This turning away is fundamentally an act of disordered love, driven by perverse desires.

For Augustine, the will is central. The Fall of Man, he argues, was not due to ignorance, but to a free act of the will choosing a lesser, created good over the Creator. This act introduced concupiscence—a pervasive inclination towards selfish desire that distorts our affections and pulls us away from God.

Augustine's View on Desire and Sin:

  • Original Sin: A corruption of the will inherited from Adam, leading to a predisposition for disordered desire.
  • Concupiscence: The inclination towards worldly desires and pleasures, often at the expense of spiritual goods.
  • The Will's Role: The will, though wounded, retains its freedom to choose. When it consents to disordered desire, it becomes the cause of actual sin.
  • "Pondus Meum Amor Meus" (My love is my weight): Our desires dictate our direction, pulling us towards what we love. If we love wrongly, we fall.

(Image: A classical painting depicting Saint Augustine in contemplation, perhaps with a scroll or book, reflecting on the nature of good and evil, with subtle symbolism of inner struggle or divine inspiration in the background.)

Aquinas: Desire for a Lesser Good

Saint Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology in his Summa Theologica, further refines the understanding of desire as the cause of sin. For Aquinas, sin is fundamentally a "privation of due good," an absence of what ought to be present. It occurs when the will chooses a created good in a disordered way, turning away from the uncreated, ultimate Good (God).

Aquinas identifies specific ways desire leads to sin:

  • Inordinate Attachment: The desire for a particular good (e.g., pleasure, wealth, power) becomes inordinate when it is pursued to the exclusion or detriment of a higher good.
  • Rebellion of the Passions: Like Aristotle, Aquinas acknowledges that passions (emotional desires) can rebel against reason and the will, leading to sinful acts.
  • The Will's Choice: Ultimately, it is the free choice of the will that consents to these disordered desires and executes the sinful act. Even if desire is strong, the will can, with grace, resist.

Table: Philosophical Perspectives on Desire and Sin

Philosopher Key Concept of Desire How Desire Causes Sin Role of the Will
Plato Appetitive Soul Unchecked appetite usurps reason, leading to internal disorder and immoral actions. Reason should govern the will; when desire is too strong, it subverts reason's command.
Aristotle Passions/Appetites Strong desire (e.g., for pleasure) overcomes practical reason, leading to akrasia (incontinence). The will is weak or fails to act according to reason when faced with overwhelming desire.
Augustine Concupiscence, Disordered Love The will freely chooses a lesser good, turning away from God, driven by perverse desires. The will is central; its consent to disordered desire is the proximate cause of sin.
Aquinas Inordinate Attachment The will chooses a created good in a disordered manner, leading to a privation of due good. The will can resist disordered desire through reason and grace, but its consent actualizes sin.

Conclusion: The Persistent Challenge of Self-Mastery

The philosophical tradition, as illuminated by the Great Books of the Western World, consistently points to desire as a fundamental cause of sin. Whether understood as the unruly appetites of Plato, the overpowering passions of Aristotle, or the disordered love and concupiscence of Augustine and Aquinas, the human inclination to seek satisfaction in lesser goods, or to pursue good in a disordered way, remains a persistent challenge. The will, our faculty of choice, stands at the crossroads, capable of directing desire towards virtue or allowing it to lead us into transgression. Understanding this intricate relationship is not merely an academic exercise; it is a profound journey into the core of human nature and the timeless struggle for self-mastery.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine on Free Will and Evil"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aquinas on the Nature of Sin"

Share this post