Desire as the Cause of Sin: A Philosophical Inquiry
Indeed, it is a persistent thread woven through the tapestry of Western thought: the notion that desire, in its various manifestations, stands as a fundamental cause of sin. This is not to say that all desire is inherently malevolent, but rather that the misdirection or unchecked pursuit of desire, often enabled by a faltering will, leads humanity astray from virtue and moral rectitude. From the ancient Greeks to the Church Fathers and beyond, philosophers have grappled with the intricate relationship between our innate longings and our moral transgressions, consistently pointing to the human will as the critical juncture where desire transforms from a natural impulse into a culpable act.
The Primal Urge and the Moral Fall
To truly grasp this assertion, we must first understand what constitutes desire and sin within a philosophical context. Desire is a fundamental aspect of human existence – the yearning for something perceived as good or pleasurable. It drives us, motivates us, and shapes our aspirations. Sin, on the other hand, is broadly understood as a transgression against a moral or divine law, a "missing of the mark," or a deliberate turning away from a higher good. The Great Books of the Western World, a veritable repository of human wisdom, repeatedly explore how these two forces intersect, often tragically.
The Multifaceted Nature of Desire
Desire is not monolithic; it encompasses a vast spectrum of human experience.
- Appetitive Desires: Basic biological needs such as hunger, thirst, and procreation. These are shared with the animal kingdom.
- Concupiscible Desires: Yearnings for sensible pleasure and avoidance of pain.
- Irascible Desires: Impulses related to overcoming obstacles, such as anger, courage, and hope.
- Intellectual/Spiritual Desires: The pursuit of knowledge, truth, beauty, goodness, and ultimately, union with the divine or the highest good.
Philosophers like Plato, with his tripartite soul (appetite, spirit, reason), and Aristotle, distinguishing between rational and irrational desires, recognized that while some desires are necessary for life, others, if unchecked, could lead to disorder. It is not desire itself that is the culprit, but rather its proper ordering and governance.
The Critical Role of the Will: The Arbiter of Action
Herein lies the critical juncture: the role of the will. The will is the faculty of choice, the power by which we decide to act or not to act, to pursue one course over another. It is the will that mediates between our desires and our actions.
Image: A detailed depiction of Augustine of Hippo, seated at a desk, quill in hand, with a scroll partially unfurled before him, illustrating a complex diagram of the human soul divided into reason, will, and various appetites, suggesting the internal struggle between these faculties.
Saint Augustine, in his profound examinations of the human condition, particularly in Confessions and City of God, meticulously dissects the relationship between will and desire. For Augustine, the will is paramount. Sin is not merely a consequence of strong desires, but a voluntary act, a defect of the will that chooses to assent to disordered desire.
Consider the following table outlining this relationship:
| Stage of Sinful Action | Description | Key Philosophical Concept |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Inception of Desire | An inclination or longing arises (e.g., for forbidden fruit, for excessive wealth). | Natural appetite, concupiscence (disordered desire) |
| 2. Consideration/Deliberation | The intellect reflects on the desire, its potential object, and consequences. | Reason, Prudence |
| 3. Consent of the Will | The will freely chooses to embrace the desire and pursue its object, despite rational or moral warnings. | Liberum Arbitrium (Free Will), Moral Choice, Defect of the Will |
| 4. Execution of the Act | The physical or mental action is carried out to fulfill the consented desire. | Action, Virtue/Vice |
| 5. The Result: Sin | The transgression occurs, leading to moral culpability and separation from the good. | Missing the mark, Transgression, Guilt |
The will, in its unadulterated freedom, possesses the capacity to choose the good. However, in the post-lapsarian view (a concept prevalent in Augustine and later Aquinas), the will is weakened, prone to concupiscence – a tendency towards disordered desire. When the will assents to a disordered desire, turning away from a higher, rational, or divine good towards a lesser, temporal good, that is where sin is born.
When Desire Becomes Sinful: Disordered Affections
Desire becomes a cause of sin when it is disordered, meaning it seeks a lesser good in an inappropriate manner or prioritizes it over a greater good. This is what Aquinas refers to as a "disordered appetite." For instance:
- Gluttony: The desire for food, a natural and necessary appetite, becomes sinful when it is pursued to excess, neglecting health or charity.
- Avarice: The desire for possessions, which can be a motivator for industry, becomes sinful when it becomes an insatiable craving for wealth, leading to injustice or neglect of others.
- Lust: The desire for physical intimacy, a natural part of human connection and procreation, becomes sinful when it is detached from its proper context of love, commitment, and respect.
In each case, the desire itself is not evil, but the will's decision to pursue it in a way that transgresses moral order or reason. Thus, sin emerges not merely from the presence of desire, but from the deliberate, albeit often misguided, choice of the will to pursue it at the expense of higher goods or moral law.
Philosophical Perspectives on Desire and Sin
The Great Books offer numerous insights:
- Plato and Aristotle: Emphasized the importance of reason in governing desire. For them, virtue was the proper ordering of desires, with reason guiding the appetites. Sin, or vice, was often seen as a failure of reason or a weakness of the will to control unruly desires.
- Augustine: As discussed, underscored the will's pivotal role. Sin is a voluntary turning away from God (the ultimate good) towards lesser, temporal goods, driven by a will corrupted by disordered desire.
- Thomas Aquinas: Building on Aristotle and Augustine, Aquinas viewed sin as a voluntary transgression of divine law, originating in a disordered appetite (desire) that the will consents to. He meticulously categorized sins based on the nature of the disordered desire (e.g., pride, envy, wrath, sloth, avarice, gluttony, lust).
Overcoming Disordered Desire: The Path to Virtue
If desire is a cause of sin through the mediation of the will, then the path to virtue involves the proper ordering of desires and the strengthening of the will. This involves:
- Self-Knowledge: Understanding one's own desires and their potential pitfalls.
- Reason and Prudence: Employing intellect to discern true goods from apparent goods, and to guide the will.
- Moral Discipline: Cultivating habits of self-control and moderation.
- Virtue Cultivation: Developing virtues such as temperance, fortitude, justice, and prudence, which empower the will to resist disordered desire.
- Seeking Higher Goods: Orienting one's ultimate desires towards the highest good, whether that be eudaimonia (flourishing) or the divine.
The journey from disordered desire to virtuous living is a central theme in philosophy, requiring constant vigilance, rational deliberation, and a steadfast will.
YouTube: "Augustine Free Will Sin"
YouTube: "Aquinas Desire Virtue"
📹 Related Video: What is Philosophy?
Video by: The School of Life
💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Desire as the Cause of Sin philosophy"