Desire as the Architect of Our Moral Downfall: A Reflection on Sin's Genesis

From the ancient Greek tragedians to the early Church Fathers, and across the vast landscape of Western thought, philosophers and theologians have grappled with the elusive origins of human transgression. This article posits a core truth illuminated within the Great Books of the Western World: desire, in its untamed and misdirected forms, stands as the fundamental cause of sin. It is not merely a precursor or a temptation, but the very engine that propels the will towards actions contrary to reason, virtue, or divine law. We shall explore how this powerful internal force, when untethered from higher goods, corrupts the will and culminates in the moral deviations we term sin.

The Two Faces of Desire: A Philosophical Inquiry

To understand desire's causal role, we must first distinguish its forms. Desire, at its most basic, is a fundamental aspect of life—an inclination towards something perceived as good or pleasurable. Aristotle, in his exploration of the soul, identifies various appetites, from the lowest bodily cravings (epithymia) to the higher rational wishes (boulēsis). Plato, similarly, delineates the soul into appetitive, spirited, and rational parts, suggesting a constant interplay where the lower desires often vie for control over reason.

However, it is when desire becomes disordered or inordinate that its perilous nature is revealed.

The Spectrum of Desire

  • Natural Desires: These are inclinations towards goods essential for life or flourishing (e.g., hunger, thirst, the desire for knowledge, companionship). When properly ordered and guided by reason, these are not inherently sinful.
  • Disordered Desires (Concupiscence): These are desires for goods that, while perhaps good in themselves, are sought excessively, in the wrong manner, or at the expense of higher goods. This is where the seeds of sin are sown. Augustine of Hippo, a towering figure in the Great Books, vividly describes sin as a "perverse turning away from God" and a "turning towards mutable things" – a disordered love for the creature over the Creator. This concupiscence is not merely a weakness but a powerful internal pull that distorts our moral compass.

The Will's Predicament: Desire's Causal Grip

The causal link between desire and sin is forged in the crucible of the will. It is not enough to simply feel a desire; sin truly arises when the will assents to a disordered desire, choosing a lesser good over a greater one, or choosing a perceived good that is, in essence, an evil.

Consider the following table outlining the causal chain:

| Stage of Sin's Genesis | Description operative.

The Philosophy of the Corrupt Will

The concept of "sin" as a moral state or action has theological roots, but its philosophical underpinnings concerning desire and the will are robustly explored by thinkers within the Great Books.

  • Augustine's Legacy: For Augustine, sin is not merely doing bad things, but a fundamental disordering of love. Our will, driven by desire, chooses to love mutable, finite goods (like money, power, sex) more than the immutable, infinite Good (God). This is a moral fault (malum culpae) rooted in the will's turning away, a turning that is caused by a disordered desire for something lesser. The Confessions are a testament to this struggle, where his youthful transgressions are attributed to a will captivated by fleeting pleasures.

  • Aquinas and the Passions: Thomas Aquinas, building on Aristotle, recognized that passions (desires) are natural movements of the sensitive appetite. They are not inherently good or evil. However, they become the material cause of sin when the rational will fails to regulate them according to right reason and divine law. The will becomes the formal cause of sin when it chooses to consent to the disordered passion. Thus, disordered desire provides the impetus, but the will's assent makes it sin.

  • Kant and Autonomy: While Immanuel Kant speaks less of "sin" in a theological sense, his ethical framework offers a powerful secular parallel. For Kant, a truly moral action is one performed out of duty, dictated by the autonomous will applying the categorical imperative, not out of inclination (desire). When our actions are caused by desires, even benevolent ones, they lack true moral worth, as they are heteronomous, not self-legislated by reason. The will that acts purely from desire is not a good will.

The common thread is clear: the will is the faculty of choice, but its choices are profoundly influenced, indeed often caused, by the desires that present themselves. When these desires are not aligned with reason, duty, or ultimate good, the will, by assenting to them, commits sin.

The Unseen Architect: How Desire Shapes Our Moral Landscape

Desire, therefore, is not a passive emotion but an active force. It shapes our perceptions, influences our judgments, and ultimately directs our choices. When a desire for personal gain (avarice) overshadows the desire for justice, the will is swayed to commit fraud. When a desire for fleeting pleasure (lust) overrides the desire for fidelity, the will consents to betrayal. The internal struggle, so eloquently depicted in countless works of philosophy and literature, is precisely the battle between competing desires and the will's ultimate decision.

  • The Path to Virtue: Conversely, the mastery of desire is central to the pursuit of virtue. Aristotle's ethics emphasize the cultivation of habits that align our desires with reason, finding the "golden mean." The Stoics advocated for an even more radical control, seeking apatheia – not the absence of feeling, but freedom from the disturbance of irrational passions. In both cases, the will is trained to resist the pull of disordered desires and instead to pursue what is truly good.

The persistent challenge for humanity, as revealed by the Great Books, is not merely the existence of desire, but its proper ordering. When desire becomes the cause of sin, it is because it has usurped the rightful place of reason and a rightly-ordered will.

Conclusion: Reclaiming the Will from Unruly Desire

The assertion that desire is the cause of sin is not an indictment of desire itself, but a profound recognition of its power and potential for moral corruption. The insights gleaned from Plato's tripartite soul, Augustine's meditations on disordered love, Aquinas's distinctions of cause, and even Kant's emphasis on the good will, all point to the same conclusion: sin emerges when the will, swayed by a yearning for a lesser or illicit good, turns away from the higher good. Understanding this causal relationship is the first step towards self-mastery and the arduous, yet essential, journey towards virtue and moral rectitude.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting a robed figure, perhaps a philosopher or saint, seated at a desk, head in hand, surrounded by scrolls and a flickering candle. The figure's expression is one of profound internal contemplation or struggle, suggesting a deep wrestling with moral choices or inner temptations. The background is dimly lit, with subtle allegorical elements like a half-hidden serpent or a distant, towering city on a hill, symbolizing temptation and the pursuit of a higher good, respectively.)

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine Confessions desire sin will""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Ethics passions reason virtue""

Share this post