Desire as the Architect of Our Moral Downfall: Unpacking the Root of Sin

In the grand tapestry of human experience, few concepts are as universally understood, yet profoundly debated, as desire and sin. From ancient myths to modern psychology, humanity has grappled with the insidious pull of our inner longings and the subsequent transgressions that follow. This article posits that desire, in its unbridled or misdirected form, stands as the primary cause of sin, acting not merely as a temptation but as the very architect of our moral transgressions. Drawing insights from the Great Books of the Western World, we shall explore how philosophers and theologians have meticulously traced the path from an initial yearning to a culpable act, illuminating the intricate interplay between our innate appetites and the choices of our will.

To assert desire as the cause of sin requires a careful unpacking of both terms. Desire, in this context, refers to any strong feeling of wanting to have something or wishing for something to happen – an appetite, a longing, an inclination. Sin, broadly defined across philosophical and theological traditions, is an act that transgresses a moral or divine law, a deviation from what is considered good or right. The argument is not that desire itself is inherently evil, for many desires are natural and even necessary for life. Rather, it is the disordered desire, the desire that overrides reason, duty, or love, that paves the path to moral failing.

Key Concepts in the Desire-Sin Nexus:

  • Appetite (Plato): The lowest part of the soul, constantly seeking gratification.
  • Concupiscence (Augustine): Disordered desire, a consequence of the Fall, driving the will away from God.
  • Incontinence/Akrasia (Aristotle): Knowing what is good but failing to act on it due to overwhelming desire.
  • Inclination (Kant): A natural pull towards something, contrasted with acting from duty.

(Image: A classical painting depicting the temptation of Adam and Eve, with a serpent subtly present, symbolizing the initial desire for forbidden knowledge or pleasure leading to original sin.)

Echoes from the Ancients: Philosophical Perspectives on Desire and Moral Failing

The intellectual giants of Western thought have long contemplated the relationship between what we want and what we do.

Plato's Tripartite Soul and the Tyranny of Appetite

In Plato's Republic, the human soul is divided into three parts: reason, spirit, and appetite (epithymia). While reason should rule, supported by spirit, it is often the appetitive part that asserts dominance. When desires for pleasure, wealth, or power become unchecked, they lead to an imbalance, creating an unjust soul and, by extension, unjust actions. A soul ruled by unbridled desire is a soul in disharmony, inherently prone to what we might call sin. The pursuit of transient pleasures at the expense of true good is a direct consequence of desires allowed to run wild.

Aristotle's Akrasia: The Weakness of Will in the Face of Desire

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, delves into the phenomenon of akrasia, or incontinence. This describes a state where an individual knows what is good and rational but fails to act accordingly, succumbing instead to the pull of immediate pleasure or desire. Here, desire does not necessarily corrupt the intellect's understanding of good, but it overpowers the will, preventing it from executing the rational choice. The cause of the errant action is the desire's strength, which momentarily paralyses or redirects the will.

The Theological Turn: Augustine and Aquinas on Disordered Desire

With the advent of Christian thought, the concept of sin takes on a deeper, more spiritual dimension, and the role of desire becomes even more pronounced.

Saint Augustine: Concupiscence and the Fallen Will

For Saint Augustine, particularly in his Confessions and City of God, desire is not merely a cause of sin but is deeply intertwined with Original Sin itself. After the Fall, human nature became corrupted, leading to concupiscence – a disordered desire that relentlessly pulls the will away from God. This concupiscence is not just sexual desire but any inclination that turns the soul away from its true good (God) towards lesser, temporal goods. It is this inherent inclination, a spiritual sickness of desire, that makes sin almost inevitable without divine grace. The will, once free to choose good, now finds itself enslaved by these disordered desires, making them the direct impetus for sinful acts.

Saint Thomas Aquinas: Reason, Will, and the Privation of Good

Aquinas, building on Aristotle and Augustine in his Summa Theologica, elaborates on the interaction of intellect and will. He argues that evil is not a substance but a privation of good. Sin occurs when the will chooses a lesser good, mistaking it for the true good, often under the influence of desire. For Aquinas, while the intellect presents options, it is the will that assents. However, desire can cloud the intellect, presenting the lesser good as more appealing, thus misleading the will. The cause of sin, therefore, lies in the will's assent to a disordered desire, a turning away from the ultimate good towards a particular, finite good that contradicts reason.

The Mechanism of Sin: A Simplified Flow

  1. Origin of Desire: An innate longing or external stimulus sparks a desire.
  2. Rational Assessment (or Lack Thereof): Reason evaluates the desire against moral law or ultimate good.
  3. The Will's Conflict: The will is pulled between reason's judgment and the desire's allure.
  4. Assent to Disordered Desire: The will yields to the desire, even if it contradicts reason or duty.
  5. The Act of Sin: The desired action is performed, constituting the transgression.

The Modern Dilemma: Desire, Duty, and the Will's Sovereignty

Even in later philosophical traditions, the tension between desire and moral action persists. Immanuel Kant, for instance, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, sharply distinguishes between acting from duty and merely acting in accordance with duty. For Kant, actions motivated by inclination or desire, even if they align with duty, lack true moral worth. While he doesn't use the term "sin" in a theological sense, he highlights how acting purely from desire (inclination) rather than the moral law can undermine the purity of one's actions and the autonomy of the will.

Conclusion: Desire as the Persistent Impetus

From the appetitive excesses of Plato's soul to Augustine's concupiscence and Aquinas's analysis of the misguided will, the philosophical and theological traditions consistently identify desire as a fundamental, often primary, cause of sin. It is the initial spark, the relentless pull, that challenges our reason and tests the strength of our will. While the will ultimately makes the choice, it is frequently the disordered desire that sets the stage, clouds judgment, and weakens resolve, making the path to transgression seem not only possible but, at times, irresistible. Understanding this intricate relationship is crucial for any meaningful discussion of ethics, morality, and the enduring human struggle for virtue.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine on Evil and Free Will""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Akrasia Explained""

Share this post