Desire as the Architect of Sin: An Inquiry into the Human Condition

Summary: This article delves into the profound philosophical question of desire's role as the fundamental cause of sin within the Western intellectual tradition, drawing heavily from the Great Books of the Western World. We explore how desire, particularly when disordered or misdirected by the human will, moves from a natural human impulse to the very genesis of transgression. From the ancient Greek understanding of appetites to the Christian theological framework of original sin and corrupted will, we trace the intricate relationship between our deepest longings and our moral failings, asserting that while desire itself is not inherently sinful, its improper ordering by a flawed will is the true cause of sin.

The Primacy of Desire: A Philosophical Unpacking

To speak of desire as the cause of sin is to venture into the very heart of human nature and morality. What, precisely, do we mean by "desire"? In the broadest sense, desire is an inclination or longing for something. It is a fundamental aspect of life, driving us towards sustenance, knowledge, love, and myriad other ends. However, within the philosophical and theological traditions of the West, desire takes on a more nuanced meaning, often categorized and scrutinized for its moral implications.

  • Natural Desires: These are inclinations towards goods essential for human flourishing, such as food, water, and companionship. Philosophers like Aristotle recognized these as inherent to our being.
  • Acquired Desires: These are shaped by culture, experience, and individual pursuits, ranging from the longing for wealth or fame to the yearning for artistic expression.
  • Disordered Desires (Concupiscence): This category, particularly prominent in Christian thought, refers to desires that are excessive, misplaced, or directed towards objects contrary to reason or divine law. It is here that the seeds of sin are often sown.

The Great Books offer a rich tapestry of perspectives on desire. Plato, in his Republic, conceptualizes the soul as having a tripartite structure: reason, spirit, and appetite. Sin, in this view, often arises when the appetitive part of the soul, driven by its desires, usurps the rightful leadership of reason. Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, discusses akrasia or incontinence, where an individual, despite knowing what is good, acts against their better judgment due to overwhelming desires.

The Nature of Sin: A Transgression of Order

Before we firmly establish desire as a cause, we must define sin. In the Western tradition, sin is not merely a mistake or an error in judgment. It is a deliberate turning away from what is good, true, or morally right. It represents a transgression against natural law, divine law, or the dictates of right reason.

Key Characteristics of Sin:

  1. Voluntary Act: Sin is fundamentally an act of the will. It implies choice and intentionality, even if influenced by passion or ignorance.
  2. Disorder: Sin introduces disorder into the individual soul, the community, and the created order. It is a deviation from the harmonious arrangement intended by nature or God.
  3. Against Reason/Law: Whether understood through the lens of rational ethics or divine commandment, sin stands in opposition to a higher standard of conduct.

Saint Augustine, a towering figure whose works are cornerstones of the Great Books, profoundly shaped the understanding of sin. For Augustine, sin is not a substance but a privation, a lack of goodness, a turning away (aversio) from the immutable good (God) towards mutable goods (creatures). This turning away is driven by a disordered love or desire, which he termed cupiditas, in contrast to caritas (charitable love).

The Causal Nexus: Desire, Will, and the Genesis of Sin

The relationship between desire, will, and sin is complex and often debated. Is desire the direct cause? Or is it merely an impulse that the will then acts upon? Most philosophical and theological traditions argue for a mediating role of the will.

Consider the following progression:

  1. Emergence of Desire: An object or idea presents itself, stimulating an inclination or longing within the individual. This initial stir of desire is often natural and morally neutral. For example, the desire for food.
  2. Deliberation of the Will: The rational faculty, through the will, evaluates this desire. Is it appropriate? Is its object good? Does pursuing it align with higher goods or moral law?
  3. Assent or Dissent: Here lies the crucial juncture. If the will assents to a disordered desire—a desire for something that is not truly good, or good in an inappropriate way or measure—it leads to a sinful act. If the will resists or redirects the desire, sin is averted.

Augustine's Contribution: For Augustine, particularly in On Free Choice of the Will, the will is paramount. Sin is a defect of the will, a free choice to turn away from God. While temptations arise from desires, it is the will's consent to these temptations that constitutes sin. He famously stated, "For what is sin but a perverse will?" The will has the power to either yield to or resist the pull of desire. When it yields to desire for a lesser good, neglecting a greater good, that is the cause of sin.

Aquinas's Elaboration: Thomas Aquinas, building upon Augustine and Aristotle in his Summa Theologica, further refines this understanding. He distinguishes between different types of appetite (concupiscible and irascible) and emphasizes the role of the rational will. While concupiscence (sensory desire) can incline the will towards evil, it does not compel it. Sin, for Aquinas, is a voluntary act, a choice made by the will against right reason and divine law. The desire may present the temptation, but the will provides the consent.

Philosophical Stage Description of Desire Role of Will Outcome
Initial Impulse Natural inclination towards an object or experience. Passive reception of impulse. Morally neutral.
Temptation Disordered desire (e.g., for excessive pleasure, illicit gain) presents itself. Active consideration, internal struggle. Potential for sin.
Consent of Will The will freely chooses to yield to the disordered desire. Deliberate choice, active assent. Sinful Act.
Resistance of Will The will freely chooses to reject the disordered desire, aligning with reason/virtue. Deliberate choice, active dissent. Virtue, avoidance of sin.

Mechanisms of Sinful Desire: Where the Will Falters

The specific ways in which desire leads to sin are manifold, often stemming from a misapprehension of true good or a weakness of will.

  • Ignorance: Sometimes, a person desires something that appears good but is, in reality, harmful or contrary to moral law, due to a lack of knowledge.
  • Passion/Emotion: Intense emotions can overwhelm reason, making it difficult for the will to assert its proper authority over desire. This is the classic struggle of reason versus passion.
  • Habit: Repeated indulgence in disordered desires can form vicious habits, weakening the will's ability to resist future temptations, leading to a cycle of sin.
  • Pride: The desire for self-exaltation, control, or independence from moral norms can be a powerful underlying cause of various sins, as it elevates the self above rightful order.

Therefore, while desire itself is a natural, even necessary, component of human experience, it is its misdirection and the will's subsequent consent to this misdirection that firmly establishes desire as the proximate cause of sin. The struggle against sin is, at its core, a struggle to properly order our desires under the guidance of reason and a virtuous will.

Conclusion: The Enduring Challenge of Self-Governance

The journey through the Great Books of the Western World reveals a consistent thread: desire, though inherent to our being, becomes the cause of sin when it is disordered and when the will fails to govern it according to reason and moral principles. From Plato's tripartite soul to Augustine's corrupted will and Aquinas's nuanced analysis of concupiscence, the message is clear: the human struggle against sin is fundamentally an internal one, a battle for the proper ordering of our desires by a strong and virtuous will. Understanding this dynamic is not merely an academic exercise; it is crucial for self-governance, ethical living, and the pursuit of genuine human flourishing.

(Image: A classical painting depicting the allegory of the Chariot from Plato's Phaedrus, with a charioteer (representing reason) struggling to control two winged horses—one noble and striving upwards (spirit), the other unruly and pulling downwards (appetite/desire)—against a backdrop of an ancient Greek landscape.)

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine on Free Will and Evil""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aquinas and the Nature of Sin""

Share this post