Defining Beauty in Abstract Art: A Philosophical Inquiry

The concept of beauty has long been a cornerstone of philosophical and artistic discourse, often tied to notions of form, proportion, and representation. Yet, abstract art boldly challenges these traditional definitions, presenting canvases devoid of recognizable subjects or narratives. How, then, do we define beauty in a realm where mimesis is abandoned, and what philosophical tools can help us navigate this seemingly formless landscape? This article delves into the subjective and objective dimensions of beauty in abstract art, drawing upon insights from the Great Books of the Western World to explore how we discern aesthetic value when representation is absent, compelling us to reconsider the very essence of form and its apprehension.

The Elusiveness of Beauty in Abstraction

For centuries, much of Western aesthetic theory, influenced by figures like Plato and Aristotle, linked beauty to the imitation of nature, the ideal human form, or a harmonious order discoverable in the world. Plato, in works like the Phaedrus and Symposium, posited an Ideal Beauty, a perfect Form existing beyond the material world, of which earthly beautiful things are but imperfect reflections. Aristotle, while grounded more in empirical observation, also spoke of beauty in terms of order, symmetry, and definiteness, as seen in his Poetics when discussing tragic form.

Abstract art, however, deliberately departs from this mimetic tradition. It strips away discernible objects, figures, and landscapes, offering instead compositions of colour, line, shape, and texture. This shift presents a profound challenge to our inherited definitions of beauty. If there is no recognizable subject to judge against an ideal form, no narrative to follow, how do we evaluate its aesthetic merit? The immediate reaction for many is often confusion, or even outright dismissal, precisely because the familiar anchors for defining beauty are absent.

Philosophical Lenses on Beauty and Form

To appreciate beauty in abstract art, we must broaden our philosophical understanding of form and aesthetic judgment. The Great Books offer several perspectives that, though not directly addressing abstract art, provide frameworks for its interpretation.

Plato's Forms and the Echo of Order

While Plato's Forms often refer to ideal representations, his emphasis on an underlying order and perfection can be reinterpreted. Could an abstract painting, through its inherent balance, rhythm, or purity of colour, hint at a deeper, non-representational Form of order or harmony? Perhaps the beauty we perceive is not in its imitation of a physical form, but in its echo of a more fundamental, abstract order that resonates with our innate understanding of universal principles. The geometric precision of a Mondrian, for instance, might appeal to a Platonic sense of ideal mathematical form.

Aristotle's Internal Coherence and Purpose

Aristotle's conception of beauty often involved the idea of an intrinsic order and proportion, where every part contributes to the whole. In his Metaphysics, he discusses form as the inherent structure or essence of a thing. Applied to abstract art, this suggests that beauty might reside in the internal coherence of the artwork itself, regardless of external reference. Does the piece possess a unified composition? Do its elements—lines, colours, shapes—relate to each other harmoniously? The beauty here is not about what it represents, but how well its internal form is organized and presented, fulfilling its own inherent purpose as a self-contained aesthetic object.

Kant's Disinterested Judgment and Subjectivity

Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Judgment, offered a revolutionary perspective on beauty as a "purposiveness without purpose." He argued that aesthetic judgment is disinterested—we appreciate something for its own sake, not for any utility or moral instruction. Furthermore, he distinguished between the "agreeable" (purely subjective pleasure) and the "beautiful" (a pleasure we expect others to share, implying a universal validity, even if subjective in origin).

For abstract art, Kant's ideas are particularly pertinent:

  • Disinterestedness: We engage with abstract pieces without the burden of identifying a subject or narrative. Our appreciation is free from conceptual baggage.
  • Subjectivity and Universality: While our initial response to an abstract work might be purely subjective ("I like the colours"), Kant suggests that when we call something beautiful, we are implicitly claiming that others should find it beautiful, too. This pushes us to seek a shared ground for aesthetic experience, even in the absence of explicit form. The challenge then becomes identifying what qualities in the abstract form elicit this shared sense of beauty.

(Image: A close-up, high-resolution photograph of a heavily textured, abstract expressionist painting. The canvas is thick with impasto, showing swirling brushstrokes of deep blues, fiery oranges, and muted greys. Jagged lines intersect soft, blurred areas, creating a dynamic tension. The light catches the peaks and valleys of the paint, revealing its three-dimensional quality and emphasizing the raw, unadulterated form and texture.)

Abstract Art: Beyond Mimesis, Towards Experience

Abstract art compels us to redefine our understanding of beauty by shifting focus from what is depicted to how it is depicted, and what experience it evokes. The form itself—the arrangement of colours, the weight of lines, the texture of the surface—becomes the primary subject of aesthetic contemplation.

Consider the following aspects of abstract form that contribute to its perceived beauty:

  • Sensory Experience: The immediate impact of colour, light, and texture. A Rothko painting's shimmering fields of colour are beautiful not because they represent anything, but because they evoke a profound emotional or contemplative state.
  • Compositional Harmony: The balance, rhythm, and tension created by the arrangement of elements. A Kandinsky, for example, orchestrates visual "music" through the interplay of shapes and lines.
  • Emotional Resonance: Abstract art can communicate raw emotion, mood, or energy without relying on narrative. The form itself carries the affective content.
  • Intellectual Engagement: The viewer is invited to actively participate in interpreting the work, to find personal meaning in its non-representational form. This intellectual journey can be a source of aesthetic pleasure.
  • Purity of Expression: By stripping away the superfluous, abstract art can achieve a distilled, pure expression of the artist's inner vision or a fundamental artistic idea.

Towards a New Definition of Beauty in Abstraction

Ultimately, defining beauty in abstract art requires an expansion of our aesthetic vocabulary. It moves us away from a singular, objective standard tied to representation and towards a more nuanced understanding that embraces both subjective experience and universal aesthetic principles inherent in form.

Here are some characteristics that contribute to the definition of beauty in abstract art:

Characteristic Description Philosophical Link
Internal Coherence The harmonious relationship between all elements (colour, line, shape, texture) within the artwork, creating a sense of unity and balance. Aristotelian notions of form and order; a self-contained completeness.
Emotional Evocation The capacity of the form to elicit strong feelings, moods, or states of mind in the viewer without explicit narrative. Kant's "purposiveness without purpose," where the artwork's form seems designed to produce a feeling, even if we don't know its "purpose."
Visual Innovation The originality and novelty of the form or artistic approach, challenging conventions and expanding our perception of what art can be. Hegelian ideas of art as the manifestation of the Spirit's self-development, continually seeking new forms of expression.
Sensory Richness The captivating quality of the artwork's purely visual and tactile elements, engaging the senses directly and powerfully. Empiricist perspectives on aesthetic experience, where immediate sensory data is paramount; the direct apprehension of form without intellectual mediation.
Intellectual Provocation The ability of the abstract form to stimulate thought, interpretation, and introspection, inviting the viewer to actively engage with its meaning or lack thereof. Socratic inquiry into definitions; the artwork as a prompt for philosophical reflection on form, perception, and beauty.

Conclusion

The journey to define beauty in abstract art is not a dismissal of classical aesthetics but an expansion of it. It compels us to look beyond the surface, beyond the representational form, and into the very essence of visual experience and philosophical inquiry. Drawing from the Great Books, we find that whether through Plato's ideal Forms, Aristotle's internal coherence, or Kant's disinterested judgment, the philosophical underpinnings for appreciating beauty in the abstract are robust. Abstract art re-educates our perception, asking us to trust our intuition, to engage our emotions, and to find beauty in purity of form, harmonious composition, and profound expression. It is a testament to the enduring human capacity to find meaning and aesthetic pleasure in the most fundamental elements of creation, urging us to constantly redefine what beauty means to us.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Theory of Forms explained""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Kant's Aesthetics and the Critique of Judgment""

Share this post