## Begging the Question - The Fallacy under Question

### Begging the Question - The Fallacy under Question

Fending off the begging fallacy questions the Being of the Möbius Method. In pursuit of the absurd let’s see where this goes. Down the rabbit hole we go… Teedering on a tipping point of endless horizons, the event is manifest and omnipresent. All seeing, all knowing, it’s past, present and future is nothingness of Being and Time. Resign to the Dasein, surrender to the Being of Sartre. Nothingness prevails and proclaims, “The weight of the world is on your shoulders, choose your fate.” A perspective worth living? Perhaps. Question everything, thrownness is your kindness. Reflections in groups produce different outcomes, the observer matters. Sound familiar? Quantum Mechanics employs a full time conscious observer and this superposition can not be mechanized. If quantum congruence is found in reconciling probabilities with the concrete, the unification would be discrete, particularly the particles they “quanta”fy. A black hole of nothingness defines Dasein in *forme*, function as well as the levers of any fulcrum. Begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle. In Chapter 11 I present a fallacy so large, the biggest I have ever seen. Arguing from within the circle, the point of Euclidean geometry, our foundations of geometry construct a dimensionless, unique position in space, through which trajectories travel. As we know, quantum mechanics is commonly built upon a Hilbert space where a state (even a superposition state) is represented by a vector, that is a point in this space. Bohmian mechanics, try to assign a particular slit to a wave which goes through both, the theory (or principle) that I propose in Chapter 11 challenges the properties of primitive notions. Simulacra or Simulation? Dirac functions in a two party state, all on or off. Integrating dualistic properties to the uniqueness of one, imparts the wisdom of randomness with the innate structures of our universe. I need a good mathematician to collaborate with, unfortunately Academia isn’t sympathetic to begging for any questions. I will keep begging with my questions, only answers will sustain me.