Hopium Defiance Defined

Addictive as it may be, the language we use is impregnated with the mustard seed of something foul, delivered with benevolence in mind, this is our birthright and yet society isn't always correct, politically or ethically.

By Dante, Luis de Góngora, Baruch Spinoza, Alexander Pope, Nikolai Gogol, Søren Kierkegaard, Carl Jung, Niels Bohr, Bernard Williams,

Jul 26, 2022
18 min read


All hope abandon, ye who enter here!
— Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)
Hope is an Addiction and Should be Treated As SuchA planksip Möbius



All hope abandon, ye who enter here!"
— Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)

The titled responsion sounds like Dante's version of Hell.

Dante - planksip
Dante was a major Italian poet of the Late Middle Ages. His Divine Comedy, originally called Comedìa and later christened Divina by Boccaccio, is widely considered the greatest literary work composed
What does Dante Alighieri have in common with other intellectual giants of the past have in common? Find out on planksip.
Hopium is a Four Letter Word and Hope is an AddictionPragmatics Negate Hope.


Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never is, but always to be blest.
— Luis de Góngora (1561-1627)

The titled responsion is a biological apologetic of sorts. What's your perspective?

The back and forth at play here is extinctive at best and schizophrenic at worst. Buying into a social narrative, a story without ending takes us to places beyond the addictive fiction we follow. The pathology is the inability to distinguish fact from reality, separated from the string of thought that confines the self on the identity of a ship from Theseus. Will you walk the "plank" of this pirate-inspired paranoia?

Hope springs eternal in the human breast. We cannot deny it, we cannot avoid it, but sometimes, it is not enough. It does not fill a hole in the heart. In order for hope to fill the heart, something more is needed - something tangible and concrete.

Hope is the gift of the giver. God has placed hope in the hearts of those who are His. If you look at any Christian church or temple, the first thing you will notice is a banner on the side of the building that says, "HOPE." The purpose of this is for the members to see that the church is not just filled with people who have already passed away but that there is hope for those who have yet to make it to this place. This helps them to see the possibilities in their lives.

Luis de Góngora - planksip
Luis de Góngora y Argote was a Spanish Baroque lyric poet. Góngora and his lifelong rival, Francisco de Quevedo, are widely considered the most prominent Spanish poets of all time. His style...
What do Luis de Gongora and Heraclitus have in common? Find out on planksip.

True hope is also the gift of the giver. When someone gives you hope in the hope that it will be returned, that is the gift of the giver. That person is the one that gave you hope or the one who gave you the gift of hope. If someone is giving you hope by telling you that you can have happiness when you want it, that person is the one who gave you the gift of hope.

The gifts of the giver are not always tangible. It is like saying to the giver, "I wish you would give me a hug". You do not receive anything tangible from that hug, but the experience of the hug makes you feel good. The same is true for hope. Hope is a feeling that fills your body and gives you a feeling of hope in your life.

The giver of hope is God. The gift of hope is God's love. The love is not to be taken lightly, but the love of God is to be given to others because they too are God's children. God's love is the love that heals. There are no limits to God's love. It comes in a multitude of forms and manifestations.

One of the manifestations of God's love is that you can trust Him to provide all things. When He is around, there is a certainty about everything. The assurance comes from the Holy Spirit who is with God. When God is not around, you will find that you must rely on Him to provide assurance for your life.

There are many ways to gain this assurance from God. If you read the Word of God, He will fill you with the knowledge to know what is right. If you pray, you will receive this assurance. You can be certain that He will provide the assurance you seek. You can be assured that there is life after death and that the soul comes back to God. You can be certain that your love for Him is unlimited.

It is possible to believe that God is a loving God because He has said so. When you believe this, you are filled with the certainty that there is a way that you can get what God wants. It is possible to have hope in the hopes of God because he has promised it to you in His Word.

If you want your hopes to continue to be filled with the assurance of God, you need to believe it in your heart. This assurance is in God's promises that you will experience. When you believe that God wants what he promised, you will be filled with confidence and will receive it. The assurance is a gift from God, but also from the Holy Spirit who is with God. and it is a gift that you receive. for free.

It is important for you to receive assurance from God so that you can be sure that you have the assurance you are looking for. to have what is necessary to make your life meaningful. It is also important to understand that assurance is something that comes with faith because you have to believe that you will receive what you want.

You cannot ask for assurance from God because it is impossible to have it, but you can receive it from God. You can receive the assurance of God and hope because it comes from him. You can receive it because he has promised it to you.


Fear cannot be without hope nor hope without fear.
— Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677)

The titled responsion is dialectical for certain; the comparison and contrast derive counterfactuals of, perhaps, a false dichotomy. Do you see the difference?

I purchased a magazine the other day. Inside the magazine was another article about ladies on the Cape who have "remained inside misfortune," who are solid inside their anguish. One of the statements posted inside the article in strong yet silent tribute was, "Fear can't be without trust, nor trust unafraid." Thanks to Baruch Spinoza, the realization of this fear factors into our individual streams of consciousness. What remains is up for discussion.

Baruch Spinoza - planksip
Baruch Spinoza was a Dutch philosopher of Sephardi/Portuguese origin. By laying the groundwork for the 18th-century Enlightenment and modern biblical criticism, including conceptions of the self...
What do Baruch Spinoza and Eve Garnier have in common? Find out on planksip.

What the hell is this expected to mean? I can see somebody setting this inside a chronicled setting trying to make a "significant novel", giving this some sort of importance according to an occasion before. A war, an extraordinary fire, an episode of some illness, an individual misfortune in the subject's life. A biographer would state this was from his idea in a "blue" period in his life. Or then again, some other avocation. A development of negligible connections.

On the off chance that we basically take a gander at the words, clearly, this is an extremity, and we have become so theoretically bumbling that this one extremity seems to have some sort of screwing incredible profundity. (I surmise in the event that one moved from a to b and that was every one of the ones did, the development between to two would start to be the feature of the day.) I can't perceive any, can you? It is only a distraction of dread and expectation, a more than (and not as much as) situation driving nowhere fast. Presently/time on the here/space. Dread moves to trust, trust moves to fear. This is the visually impaired, it is a condition of partition; it is what has been utilized to choke observation, to stop articulation as life. Our memory "bot" picture minds unequipped for seeing past this di[e]-mensional introduction!

Life would/will be a total articulation, all including and all-encompassing. What else is there in like manner sense? This announcement is, by configuration, restricted. This announcement is comprised of thought and conviction and supposition, it has no substance, and it underpins enduring that isn't simply the recompense of life to communicate. Expectation and dread can't be a genuine articulation of life by the idea of their impediment. They are the limiters, and they are being sold as the real world!


Furthermore, our magazines are revering this. This article is about the EMOTIONAL/EMO condition of the mother! WTF

By the way, I am intentionally leaving out all references to the source article. The reason is that it doesn't matter, and I don't want to provide any more eyeballs on this drivel.


There is no hope unmingled with fear, and no fear unmingled with hope.
— Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677)

The titled responsion is fear-full at least partially so!

Baruch Spinoza - planksip
Baruch Spinoza was a Dutch philosopher of Sephardi/Portuguese origin. By laying the groundwork for the 18th-century Enlightenment and modern biblical criticism, including conceptions of the self...
What do Baruch Spinoza and Eve Garnier have in common? Find out on planksip.

Expectation, desire, or our perspective on the future; is at the core of this statement. We don't trust the past, nor do we (by and large) dread it. The equivalent is likewise generally valid for the present.

Just the future routinely holds the twofold-edged blade of expectation and dread. Trust in what may be acceptable or alluring, and dread what may be awful or undesirable.

However, when we think about the future, there is a harmony between expectation and dread. As we don't let dread or expectation rule unopposed, we ought to do genuinely well.

Why is balance significant?

However long we stay to a great extent in the present and don't harp exorbitantly on the future, both can be quieted. Furthermore, if we plan for the most exceedingly awful, we can relieve the effect of the less attractive results. Plan what can be, may be, and we trust never becomes, and afterward finish, modifying varying.

However, balance is a precarious word in this specific situation. I don't imply that we should have equivalent proportions of expectation and dread, even though you may discover that to be valuable to you. The fact is to discover what works for you. Do you need the dread to rouse you, or does it cause you to freeze and sit idle?

What's more, who cares about hope? Is it accurate to say that you are so blinded by it that you overlook the possible issues or issues which could make you neglect to achieve your objective? Or then again, have you been scorched by "trust" so often that you have no utilization for it by any stretch of the imagination? How can it change for various circumstances?

A large portion of us will be somewhere close to the limits. In certain parts of our lives, we will be more cheerful and dreadful in others. A few things will dazzle us with expectation, and others will incapacitate us with dread. Finding your equalization point will assist you with the future, just as assisting you dozing around evening time.

Where would I be able to apply this in my life?

We should each discover the parity which works best for us. Furthermore, where that point is likely could be distinctive in various conditions. That implies you need to know yourself and what things will work best for you. Moreover, you should search inside yourself to find that parity point.

That may not seem fun, so focus on the pleasant you'll have next time when you can get everything adjusted, have the perfect measure of expectation and dread, and use them to accomplish your objective. You can make anything sound like work if you word it inaccurately. Attempt to make it fun.

Consider all mind-blowing pieces where your expectation isn't even with your dread, just like the opposite. Shouldn't something be said about sentiment? What about visiting the head of a tall structure and watching out, or even down? Shouldn't something be said about flying or taking a vessel ride?

When your sole expectation is to get out alive, your dread is presumably somewhat high, correct? Also, if your sole dread is that you bungle what you intend to state, at that point, you may be excessively cheerful. On the off chance that you go to and fro between them, you most likely need to get off the enthusiastic thrill ride, correct?

Consider something where you have a lot of dread. Do you know why? Do you get it? For what reason is it so incredible? What do you do to strengthen that conviction and dread in this way? What fears have you vanquished before? How could you defeat that dread and see the movement as every day?

On the off chance that you are as yet incapable to persuade yourself to decrease your degree of dread, you can search for books, discover other people who have diminished that dread, or who may have the option to assist you with discovering more want to adjust the dread. What works for others probably won't work for you, so you'll need to locate your way.

Shouldn't something be said about the occasions you are excessively confident, without a legitimate proportion of dread to adjust things? Do you climb things since they are there? That is incredible on the off chance that you can get down securely. If not, you should figure out how to decrease the expectation and locate a sound measure of concern or even dread for balance.

We, as a whole, have motivations for expectation and motivations to fear. When we have a lot of one without a great part of the other, we are out of equalization. Beneficial things seldom originate from such awkward nature. What are you going to change about your expectations and your apprehensions?

Then the child is having chemo, which the FDA concedes has no adequacy, yet has put billions of dollars into and fears losing benefits, so it doesn't change a training it KNOWS just for languishing.

The business benefits.

The mother is "blessed" for her capacity to withstand languishing.

In the interim, the kid is being killed: He is most likely in extraordinary torment.

What is this?

This is such a wreck.

Too many "valuable" radiances around here. An excessive number of memory screens as brain, a radiance, the ideal mode for symbolism burden. To much overlooking what very exists as all that is seen is the valuable "corona".

Sound like a natural story. Does anybody see a closeness?

Take a gander at the artistic creations of holy people with their radiances; why should a corona persist when we can eradicate this virus? Why not look at this as though it is a science fiction picture? It resembles the comic book pictures we have today where the people are in space wearing things on their heads to breathe in another atmosphere. Maybe those old artworks of holy people, who were the main ones painted in the light of the fact that the chapels had all the MONEY to pay the specialists and normally painted what upheld their benefits, were of holy people that outsiders quite vanquished! Is it so outlandish to accept that there is a between dimensional corona around the entirety of our heads, set by some outsider race/between dimensional presence? Is it so outlandish that we have been customized? I mean, why have a corona? What might the motivation behind a radiance be?

Could this world be sucked dry, squandered, and manhandled, be the wellspring of vitality for something different? For what other reason would this planet be so manhandled, the assets so mishandled?

On the off chance that this was your genuine home, and you were esteeming your home, okay, not have any desire to deal with it and SEE it? However, imagine a scenario where you were exotically closed down through a framework that halted your normal physical erotic nature. Imagine a scenario in which a corona restricted your reasonable capacity and every other person's to where by and large, all of you concurred.

What I portray is really what exists. Try not to take my statement for this; simply set aside the effort to search for yourself and I mean truly look. You will begin perceiving how there are endless things that bode well!

There is so much data now that even a little exploration can guide one. Furthermore, individuals are standing up and talking, experts and specialists.

Somebody with PC access can proceed to investigate options, not have their child experience such practices TWICE.

These individuals have the assets to pick another approach to deal with this circumstance; they have the opportunity to research.

Their child is not required to experience chemotherapy, and he is currently 19.

Particularly for somebody who has been advised to look fresh and examine choices. In the aspect of the world this individual lives in, with the measure of instruction this individual has, with the measure of data accessible, there is no reason for that kid to lie in a clinic being given chemotherapy.

Only a little examination would have uncovered how adequacy is determined and how the business manhandles individuals. Indeed, even a quick look would have prompted an acknowledgment of how this framework functions.

It doesn't sound good to me, and I need to understand this because there is no presence of mind.

That the mother is acting in a magazine like a screwing virgin mary, colored hair and all, acting like she has incredible profundity, where what she is doing is lauding her feelings in a demonstration of personal responsibility and self-glorification, while her child is lying in a medical clinic bed being manhandled for cash is extremely wiped out.

This isn't quality; this isn't fortitude, this is weakness and obliviousness.

This is the love, the war boat of a bogus god.

Wake Up. Get some perceptual profundity.


Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never is, but always to be blest.
— Alexander Pope (1688-1744)

The titled responsion is "Biology Says Different." What follows is subject to revision. Do you have any suggestions?


Everywhere across whatever sorrows of which our life is woven, some radiant joy will gaily flash past.
— Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852)

The titled responsion may sound like a shiny object. How is that even possible?

Nikolai Gogol - planksip
Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol was a Russian dramatist of Ukrainian origin. Although Gogol was considered by his contemporaries to be one of the preeminent figures of the natural school of Russian literary
What do Nikolai Gogol and Dante have in common? Find out on planksip.


Once you label me you negate me.
— Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

The titled responsion is referring to the categorical imperative version 2.0.

An "imperative" evocation of The Categories is both Aristotelian and Kantian. These metaphysical boundaries are fictively imagined and determined to provide a logical framework coupled with morality. Both examples highlight the imperative nature of our behavioral biology to assign imagined boundaries where there is nothing but a spectrum of life. It's imperative to use categories of metaphysics, from mathematics to morality, to live life in a way that doesn't transfer suffering to other conscious creatures.


We cannot change anything until we accept it. Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses.
— Carl Jung (1875-1961)

The titled responsion is addictive, acceptance is the part of the healing process in addiction, or so I am told.

Carl Jung - planksip
Carl Jung was a psychiatrist who founded analytical psychology. Jung’s work was influential in the fields of psychiatry, anthropology, archaeology, literature, philosophy, and religious studies.
What do Carl Jung and Dante have in common? Find out on planksip.

Acceptance is a relative term; if you juxtapose a complete and categorical acceptance with the dissent of man, the "evolution" of the human condition is partly subject to subjectivity. On the other hand, objective frameworks are ontological, and addictions are problematic.


Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.
— Niels Bohr (1885-1962)

The titled responsion is natural, and so is it an addiction?

When making predictions is very hard, especially about the future. This is because we are so used to living in a world of facts and figures that we do not think much about the future. There are no real surprises in our life, we know how to get by, and there are always people around us to help us in a time of need. We rely on the economy and the work ethic of those around us to keep us going.

But what about the future? Can we predict it, or is it just a certainty? How can we predict the future? What can we do to prepare for the future? And when making predictions, how do we get them right?

Niels Bohr - planksip
Niels Henrik David Bohr was a Danish physicist who made foundational contributions to understanding atomic structure and quantum theory, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922.
What do Niels Bohr and Dante have in common? Find out on planksip.

It is always important to be able to predict the future, especially the one you want, because you may not have to work as hard in that future. If you make the wrong prediction, you can end up with nothing, no work, no money, and no chance for anything better than this. This is something no person wants. So having a prediction is very important.

To be able to predict the future correctly, you have to be able to see it in detail. You have to think of things that happen in the past. Think of what happened in the past and where it will take us in the future. Think of everything you have heard from your friends about what they saw and did in the future.

And if you do not understand past people's predictions, then you need to listen to what they have to say; they may be able to tell you where the future is taking us. Of course, you should not take everything they say and put it into practice, but just try to understand it, like a puzzle.

It is important to look into the future and see what it could be. And make some guesses, and try to figure out which way the future is taking us. and try to come up with some sort of a conclusion based on the information you have gathered. You may have to find some data or some information that you can use to figure this out.

However, you should also keep your predictions short and simple so that people can understand them easily. You do not want to go on for hours explaining things unless it is vital. So if you do not understand things, then go ahead and leave it at that and explain them to someone else.

The future can be very difficult, especially about the future. So if you want to ensure that you are ready, then learn how to predict the future, and you will never regret it.

First, you need to understand that there is no way that all the world's people know all the details. Some people can see things that no one else can see. For example, if someone sees something, there are some people who know this person and others who do not know this person.

Secondly, you need to take the information that is given to you and get an understanding of it, and then put this information to work to your advantage. If a person tells you a fact about the future, try to use it to your advantage and find a way to put it into action.

Thirdly, you should look into the future with an open mind and use that information to try and use it to your advantage. When you do this you will be able to use all the knowledge you gather to help you make the future a better place.

Remember, to make your prediction easier; you need to think of a solution to any problems that arise and see the future realistically. So if you have a problem, you should see if you can use it to your advantage.


The day the Lord created hope was probably the same day he created Spring.
— Bernard Williams (1929-2003)

The titled responsion has sprung eternal from our culture's internal minds and bodies.

Bernard Williams - planksip
Bernard Williams, FBA was an English moral philosopher. His publications include Problems of the Self, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Shame and Necessity, and Truth and Truthfulness.
What do Bernard Williams and Dante have in common? Find out on planksip.

Elsewhere I have attempted to objectify hope and describe the boundaries of its utility. Addictive as it may be, the language we use is impregnated with the mustard seed of something foul, delivered with benevolence in mind; this is our birthright, and yet society isn't always correct, politically or ethically.

Hope is an Addiction and Should be Treated As SuchA planksip Möbius

The planksip writers' cooperative sponsors a re-writing of this article (500 words) with $500 in prize money for the best article as voted by your peers in the planksip writer's cooperative. Judged by your peers, your chance to join a community of creative thinkers and win over $750,000 in prize money is your entry point into becoming a planksip journalist.

We want to change the way people engage. The planksip organic platform is dedicated to supporting your voice as a writer and a thought leader. Join today. Membership matters!

Joining the planksip Writer’s Cooperative
The planksip writers cooperative gives members writing assignments, of which they compete for cash prizes. This article highlights the benefits of membership as well as outlines the rules and guidelines for submissions. Becoming a planksip writer is easier than you think.

Subscribe to our Newsletter and stay up to date!

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and work updates straight to your inbox.

Oops! There was an error sending the email, please try again.

Awesome! Now check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.