public

Who Wrote the Book of Love?

Expanding the ethical tome of Immanuel Kant's Metaphysics of Morals (1785) my ethical claim is bound to categories itself sui generis with beauty, wonder and our movement towards an orderly forme of chaos.

5 months ago

Latest Post Star Ratings on planksip by Daniel Sanderson public

Who Wrote the Book of Love?

Philosophy begins in wonder.

- Plato (Philosopher)

closeup photo of assorted-color book lot
Bounded and Compartmentalized - Another planksip Möbius

Bounded and Compartmentalized - Another planksip Möbius

Who Wrote the Book of Love?

Inspired by Plato (Philosopher)'s quote, "Philosophy begins in wonder". The titled responsion is...

Expanding the ethical tome of Immanuel Kant's Metaphysics of Morals (1785) my ethical claim is bound to categories itself sui generis with beauty, wonder and our movement towards an orderly forme of chaos. The rational mind with starry skies above is simply our best interpretation originating from the collective constellations between our ears.

n the dialogues of Socrates in The Republic, Plato presents an argument which leads us to conclude that the human intellect is not capable of grasping the truth. In the Theaetus, Plato presents the youth Socrates with some very difficult paradoxes. These are the exchange which follows: Socrates: If you believe that you are wise, then you know the truth, Theaetus; and if you suspect that perhaps you had already thought of those questions before? S: I agree, Socrates. But, I must admit, I am not wise!

The dialogue continues: Socrates: So, do you know or believe that there is any truth? The young Socrates: No, you see, but I believe that there are questions that are not asked and answers which are given by gods. In this manner, we come to the conclusion that the intellect cannot grasp the truth. The young Socrates replies: In reality, it is not this way, for I cannot believe that there is any truth and the god of the philosophers cannot give me proofs. But, he also replies: And why does not the god of the philosophers know anything? Because he is too busy with his philosophy and so can only offer proofs for it.

Socrates continues to ask, "If there are no proofs of the gods, who will provide the proofs for the gods?" and he is right, because the god of the philosophers cannot give proofs. If the god of the philosophers is too busy with his philosophy and is too busy with giving proofs, then he cannot give evidence either. The god of the philosophers has nothing to offer to us as proofs, which is what has led us to conclude that the god of the philosophers does not exist. The young Socrates replies: Well, I have discovered that the god of the philosophers exists, and not only this, the god of the philosophers gives proofs for himself! He provides me with arguments which are more convincing than the proofs which the god of the philosophers offers. Therefore, he is much more believable than the god of the philosophers.

The Depth of Thought and Free Will Competition

Inspired by Nikola Tesla (1856-1943)'s quote, "The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.". The titled responsion is

Competition from within the Scientific body emerges as a property of a group. Individuals compete with themselves for notoriety and peer prestige. For me, the highest honour citizens from this community can bestow on a fellow is recognition of excellence and ethics. If this isn't a virtuous act on a global scale, I don't know what is. Tightly bound and sequestered into hives of asocial a priori musings, the creator begins with asocial interaction. For me, borrowing a term from chemistry, eusocial events are autocatalytic. We are the keepers of this synthesis.

"Why them and not me?"

In the event that you've ever flicked through the pages of the lustrous enhancements from the end of the week papers or invested any energy understanding web journals, tuning in to web recordings or watching narratives I'll be shocked on the off chance that you haven't had this idea previously. I certainly have.

We're continually presented to accounts of accomplishment in business, learning and different expressions, which causes them to appear to be so close inside our range.

In the event that you investigate the web, you're overflowed with accounts of individuals who have made some astonishing accomplishments in their learning – regardless of whether it's the most recent multilingual who professes to communicate in 20 dialects or the person who transformed himself into a full stack engineer in about half a month.

The vast majority's moment reaction to these accomplishments isn't one they'd promptly admit to other people – envy. As substantiated by Alain de Botton our general public creates tremendous amounts of jealousy and yet appears to sentence any individual who may confess to encountering the feeling.

In our base minds, the accomplishments make others higher status than us, which causes us to ache for a similar accomplishment, particularly when we trust it's inside our scope. Regardless, that sentiment of jealousy will consistently rise now and again – similarly as it accomplishes for the youthful chimp who begrudges the prevailing male in his gathering.

Life is an opposition, however it is anything but a race against any other person. Or maybe, the genuine excursion is just against yourself and undiscovered potential. This is the thing that Jay Z implies when he raps, "I look in the mirror, my solitary rival." There's likewise the popular proverb". On the off chance that you judge a fish by its capacity to climb a tree, it will carry on with as long as its can remember accepting that it is moronic."

Likewise, Kanye West says, "It's not about the opposition. It's tied in with rivaling yourself. That is the reason when I play computer games, I like playing hustling games as opposed to battling games. Battling matches are dominated by thrashing another person. Dashing involves making sense of your procedure and driving as quick as could reasonably be expected — and that is the means by which my life has been for the current year."

Instead of going up against the following individual, you can pursue your future self. Matthew McConaughey pursues his optimal self, ten years later. He says, "Each day, consistently, consistently, and each time of my life, my legend is consistently 10 years away. I'm never going to beat my saint. I'm not going to achieve that. I know I'm most certainly not! That is okay with me, since it keeps me with someone to continue pursuing."

The most significant piece of contending with yourself is the capacity to set your own qualities and measurements. You pick the objectives that fit you best, and what you truly need to contend on — and what you don't.

What's more, definitely, at times you lose. You may do more awful than you did previously. Every so often, it's simply enough not to make a stride in reverse. Also, others, when you wouldn't dare hoping anymore, bound forward.

In any case, when you rival yourself, you won't be tricked into others' opposition and their qualities. Push ahead yet just assess yourself dependent on significant things. Grin, gesture, and afterward overlook it when others attempt to tempt you into contending. No one but you can choose the main thing to you.

Bounded and Compartmentalized - Another planksip Möbius

Published 5 months ago