Gore Vidal

Crossing the Rubicon alludes to, 'no going back'. Once you appear for the world to see in a sexual context, the act defines you in 'sotto voce'. Can you hear the whispers blowing in the wind? You can't undo the wind, entropy doesn't work that way, however deterministic complex systems may be.

Is this a sad reality of the States we know? Winners and losers exist in any game, the theory leans towards altruism with contingencies for signal errors. So why can't we all be winners, relatively speaking?

Reversing the schadenfreude reversal takes us back to a celebration of failures. If we reverse the source of schadenfreude, conscious attempts to do the harder thing (ie. PFC) is self correcting; moving towards friendship as an outcome where your outcome is desirable if, and only if, two become one.

Is this Schadenfreude reversal self serving? This one-sided tennis match is Vidal against himself, a reflection of the self that highlights the undesirable. Or is it so? Contempt and friend go together like oil and water.

We are listening but we tend to keep on walking, immersed in our own realities of proximal and distal influences of potentiality. Submissive for some and counter-intuitive for most, the social fall out is far from tribal, identities shift while paradigms persist.

Comparative analytics is part of what it means to be eusocial. Asociality emerges from individual impulses of insecurity and dichotomies of us-versus-them. Unavoidable perhaps, group dynamics dictate adaptive value as a species. Do you see the pathway to prosperity yet?

What makes you write today? Wrong turns, bad moves or a desire to learn? planksip® is an organic platform for authors and academics. Welcome.