Ezra Pound

Discuss the necessity for new narratives by, as Ezra Pound started what is now know as a modernism mantra, ‘Make It New!'.

The concept of power or dominance is, by some, considered a metaphysical construct. For me, this is a pseudo-truth, biology reveals the rest of the story. Articulated through the language of thought and Plato's ideal ideal, for me, is the watchword to our past potentiality.

Is the plurality of one is a null statement? Thrown-ness is a Heideggerian term. Truncated to individuation the pathology resembles a deviance of sorts. The individual archetype is different under an ancient Greek hegemony. How so? This is your task, your assignment to explore and disseminate.

In relation to the mean-ness of regression, we have correlated this responsion title with Herbert Marcuse, Henry David Thoreau, and now Ezra Pound. I must expand this into the trampoline-tantrums of Nassim Nicholas Taleb (Steven Pinker describes as belligerence).

Moving from the top down, we need an exposition that reflects Ezra's ontological pessimism in whatever way suits your pursuit. His ghostly perspective scans the crowd, like cries on deaf ears, the inspiration that blossoms is from a darkened dead root.

His output prodigious, meaning impressively great in extent, size, or degree. A rule-based environment is an algorithm by definition. The title responsion for this article is a call for contrast. Ambiguity versus efficiency in the language we use, poetic and otherwise.

Densely packed with academic references and a love for learning, George Steiner is alway, for me, a writer worth reading (again, and again).

New news is no news unless you make it new. Newton, on the other hand, had a limited aesthetic. What are your limitations? How do you make Newton's indelible foot prints indelible in a present potentiality?