Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good.
- Thomas Sowell (1930-present)
What worked in the past doesn't necessarily work in the future. Although, virtue is stable despite the changing conditions of interpreted data. What are the drawbacks of lacking a grand narrative? Is the responsion is problematic?
Snippet Code: p.2WCG9MB
If you are reading this and you are wondering about the significance of the above code, you might want to watch the following video...
As a philosophy bloggers, Google reviews are not easily solicited. You may disagree with our perspectives but if we share a love of philosophy or simply tending to the beauty of the mind, please say as much! What are you searching for?
Example #1: "Daniel has a very interesting philosophy! Keep up the hard work!" - You (for me)
Example #2: "Daniel mixes Neuroscience with important thinkers from our past and offers a unique ethical framework for Environment sustainability. His writing is intellectually passionate!" - You (for me)
Support Your Friendly Neighbourhood Atelier Today!