Null Hypothesis Redux
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself.
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Circumscribing Nullity and the Pathways to Prosperity - Another planksip Möbius
Null Hypothesis Redux
Inspired by Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)'s quote, "You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself." The titled responsion is...
The Elegant Equilibrium is Somewhere Between Triumph and Disaster
Inspired by Thomas Paine (1737-1809)'s quote, "The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.". The titled responsion is...
The featured meme pits the null hypothesis against a quota of aggression in a battle field of modern sport. Organized aggression by the will of the people is acceptable and enjoyable. The biological explanation settles on context dependency.
There's an articulation, "We love best not what gives us incredible joy but rather what comes through extraordinary exertion." Another individual, Thomas Paine, offered a comparative expression, "The harder the contention, the more brilliant the victory." Both imply that the harder one takes a stab at something, the better he'll feel thereafter. A few people don't think thus, and accept we as a whole love what gives extraordinary delight as it were. In any case, the things that originate from extraordinary exertion are the best. It gives individuals fulfillment when they think back, and it's important for one to endure "torment" so as to encounter triumph. Regardless of whether one doesn't arrive at the objective he sets, he can in any case feel better realizing that he in any event attempted.
Wins that have been reached through difficulty can give one fulfillment after it's finished. During a period of a test, one typically is exceptionally pushed and despondent. In spite of the fact that it probably won't seem like it first, this is the basic part that drives one to satisfaction. On the off chance that one figures out how to buckle down enough, he'll in the long run arrive at a time of win. I recall once, for science, my educator taught the class to make an inflatable vehicle, so we could find out about Newton's laws of movement. While making the vehicle, I was disappointed and I confronted numerous issues, similar to when I discovered my unique arrangement didn't work and I needed to begin without any preparation and when my sibling inadvertently popped my lone inflatable, postponing my work. Notwithstanding, through every one of those issues, I actually figured out how to make the inflatable vehicle that ventured to every part of the furthest away of all my instructor's classes. I as of late got my evaluation back: an A+. Presently, as I stay here contemplating it and understanding it, I've discovered that all the difficulties I confronted are currently history, and the victory I had is a lot better, realizing that my difficulties are finished and I demonstrated that I could arrive at practically unreachable objectives in case I'm truly propelled and I attempt. The harder it is to arrive at a victory or objective, the better it is subsequently.
It's practically essential for somebody to endure "torment", in the event that he needs to succeed. My mother consistently lets me know, "Nothing in life is simple." This is widespread and applies to everything, regardless of whether it be a computer game or an undertaking in school. At the point when I accomplish something that I accept is simple, similar to my school's mathematical schoolwork, I don't feel any fulfillment and I trust I've sat around. Nonetheless, the harder the tasks I did, for example, history I expounded on Napoleon, the better I felt. I had to read in the library for an exceptionally prolonged stretch of time, and I needed to continually compose and rework my article, until I loved it. Despite the fact that it took me hours, at long last, I got an A+, which caused me to feel better, and nearly caused me to overlook the weariness and hopelessness I encountered. In the event that one doesn't encounter any fatigue or agony while accomplishing something hard, he will realize that he didn't do a sufficient activity and necessities to attempt once more. On the off chance that I had done the Napoleon research paper loose and without torment, I would have in all likelihood not had gotten such a passing mark. In spite of the fact that it's significant to encounter "torment" to encounter win, at long last, triumph washes the memory of the hopelessness all away. At long last, extraordinary exertion permits one to feel better regardless of whether he neglects to arrive at his definitive objective. Suppose one is getting ready for a tryout and rehearsed constantly. Nonetheless, one the large day, he wrecks, breaking his odds. In spite of the fact that he didn't prevail in the tryout, he feels better realizing that he attempted. Wrecking on something one didn't make a decent attempt on will simply make him sorry. In any case, in the event that one invests incredible energy in something despite the fact that he doesn't arrive at his ideal objective, he can at present be console.
In this way, what originates from incredible exertion gives us a magnificent victory. It gives one fulfillment. "Torment" and extraordinary exertion is likewise essential in the event that one needs to have an incredible triumph. What Thomas Paine said was valid. The harder the contention, the more magnificent the victory!
The Circle of Strife
Inspired by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)'s quote, "Tyranny and anarchy are never far apart.". The titled responsion is...
Tyranny and anarchy are fuctionally möbius strips of similar origin. Instability gone awry or opportune power plays unite the masses for the excessive gain of the few. I say few because even in a dictatorship there are a few that prosper, and here I am offering a very limited use of the word prosper only to highlight the power and previleage they weld over the disadvantaged and disposessed.
The dread of oppression in this nation is the same old thing and has been around since our establishing fathers composed the Constitution. Subsequently, this dread has prompted the improvement of a mind boggling arrangement of governing rules set up to check the abundances of government.
Lamentably, the individuals who compose the Constitution are infrequently mindful of what they are doing. Thusly, they do exclude arrangements in the constitution that can be deciphered by the Supreme Court and Congress later. This prompts a ton of claims that get settled on advance as it were. It has occurred previously and will happen once more.
The Framers of the constitution didn't put stock in popular government, so they didn't have any arrangement for a Senate when the president was picked by the House of Representatives. Accordingly, they couldn't have imagined a circumstance where one individual can oversee the whole government. They remembered an arrangement for the constitution that was expected to keep this circumstance from happening, however it was never made into an arrangement.
Since the Senate was intended to be illustrative of the populace, most political deputies are chosen by the individuals. At the point when this isn't the situation, it causes a significant issue in light of the fact that the political representative is limited by law to follow the Constitution. Consequently, in the event that they overstep this law, they ought to go to prison, which can prompt rough fights and even mobs, which would eventually prompt the topple of the administration.
The dread of oppression brings about political agitation when Congress and the courts neglect to ensure the residents. At the point when they come up short, residents uproar and torch government structures, organizations, and even go to the outrageous of slaughtering authorities, incorporating those in Congress. The individuals are irate and feel that the political class is exploiting the annoyance that they have. This displeasure prompts viciousness when they feel that they are not being dealt with reasonably by their delegates.
On the off chance that this occurs, it would cause issues between the various countries on the planet, which can cause a global occurrence and perhaps even war. The United States would get immaterial on the planet and would be left to battle for itself as an underdeveloped country.
Ironicly the political deputies of the designers should ensure and serve the individuals, yet they are the ones who are manhandling them. At the point when they neglect to keep the administration working as they were proposed to, they are the ones that are liable for achieving rebellion. Notwithstanding, if this happens they are to be faulted. censure the Constitution for not being utilized in an appropriate manner?
Thus, the exercise to learn here is; The constitution is there to be utilized in the proper way. On the off chance that a lawmaker doesn't utilize the Constitution appropriately, they ought to leave and go to prison.
The issue with the majority rules system we have right presently is the way that it's anything but a just government. At the point when a president is chosen, the person vows to ensure the individuals of the nation. Be that as it may, in the event that they don't finish on their guarantee, they become tyrants.
It is fascinating to realize that numerous individuals that live in the United States feel that the legislature doesn't speak to them, however the individuals. This is the way they see our framework; We are largely equivalent according to the administration, however as a general rule, the individuals rule.
Presently at that point, does this imply our residents are excessively uninformed or languid to deal with themselves, to protect their privileges, and opportunities? In no way, shape or form. The issue is that our government officials are chosen for help, while the individuals choose them.
It appears as though the administration has overlooked the genuine importance of their activity, which is to shield the individuals from the administration itself and give them the security that they need. The individuals are not the legislature and ought not permit the administration to assume responsibility for their lives. At the point when this happens, we are at risk for a significant debacle.
You are Your Only Critic in the Unconscious
Inspired by Mary Shelley (1797-1851)'s quote, "My dreams were at once more fantastic and agreeable than my writings.". The titled responsion is...
Mary Shelley is one of those names that you read about in history books, but you might not have a full picture of. Mary Shelley was an English author who wrote a number of great works of literature, especially during the Romantic Period. This period saw the release of some of the best and most imaginative literature that had ever been written. As with so many writers, Mary's work had much to do with the Victorian period.
One of her most wonderful novels was "Frankenstein." This book has spawned many imitations, including the 2020 movie starring Russell Crowe and Billy Connolly. Another of her novel, "Herland," which is about the horrors of war, is well-regarded by historians and other critics as an amazing piece of fiction. She also wrote quite a few short stories, many of which are very good. I especially enjoyed her novella "My Dream of Flying."
In addition to these wonderful tales, there are also many poems. All of them have their own beauty and symbolism. These poems were inspired by Mary's dream about flying, as she looked out at the vast expanse of ocean. In fact, in her poem "The Ocean and All Its Wonders," she mentions a famous verse from Virgil's Aeneid that talks about how beautiful and wonderful the sea is. It's such a beautiful thing that we sometimes forget it is an ocean at all. In this case, Mary did indeed inspire a beautiful poem.
Inspired by Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936)'s quote, "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same.". The titled responsion is...
"The White Man's Burden" by Rudyard Kipling is a poem written about the white man's burden. It is also a famous literary example of Victorian-style Stoicism. The poem, written in The Letters of Kipling, vol. 1 (1895), is in the form of a classic paternal advice poem to the younger brother of the author, the poet himself. "If" is the name of the last stanza. "The White Man's Burden," as well as the book in which it is found, is entitled Triumph and Disaster.
Jameson sets the theme of the poem in the context of Victorian England. Jameson begins by describing the lives of the four children at the home of the poet, and the father of these children is Lord Henry Jameson (a character also referred to in Jameson's own works). The children are named after their parents, Leander and Mary Jameson, and their mother is named Elizabeth Jameson. They are both married to men who have a noble background and are highly respected in society. As Jameson depicts the characters in the letters, there is an undercurrent of jealousy toward their father. There is also a strong emotional attraction toward Leander, whom he refers to as a "great poet."
The four young people are not quite so close with their father, but they do seem to respect him. They appear to want to follow his lead in being highly esteemed. But, in the letters, Jameson describes the father as the hero, and it is not until his death that he is recognized as such. He was a great literary critic, an authority on his field of study, and a master storyteller. He was, as he wrote to his sister, "a man who never knew anything but good, who has done nothing for me, yet has given me more happiness than any other man ever could." This portrait is very different from the father of the young boy, who is referred to as a "poor poet."
Do half-truths work half the time?
Inspired by Virginia Wolf (1882-1941)'s quote, "If you do not tell the truth about yourself you cannot tell it about other people". The titled responsion is
The inward journey of nullity or nihilism (take your pick) is but a metaphor for the truth-claim that matters. Or natters? Prosperity, in a roundabout way, is anything but a field sport or mathematical equation. Experience matters despite the rhetoric to define consciousness through an algorithm.
On the off chance that you are in the storeroom, you have no clue about how much harm you might be doing to yourself as well as other people. On the off chance that you don't come clean about yourself you can't educate it concerning any other person. So as to lie it requires exertion on your part. In case you're straightforward with yourself you will comprehend why it's essential to come clean when conversing with another person about yourself.
Let's be honest; there are numerous individuals out there that need to utilize you or hurt you so as to hurt others. It might appear as though they are simply being decent yet it's not generally that simple to know. In the event that you don't come clean about yourself you can't inform it concerning others. Individuals will pass judgment on you dependent on what your identity is.
It's difficult to have a decent connection with somebody who lies about what their identity is. You can't confide in somebody that doesn't come clean about themselves. Your genuineness and trustworthiness ought to be sufficient for individuals to confide in you.
On the off chance that you don't come clean about yourself you can't inform it regarding others. At the point when you attempt to place someone from their perspective you are not exclusively being exploitative however you are likewise being manipulative. These are extremely perilous characteristics and they ought to never be permitted to go unchecked.
Another explanation that you can't come clean about yourself is on the grounds that your brain is loaded up with lies about what your identity is and what you feel. On the off chance that you feel that something isn't right, at that point you need to follow up on it. That implies that you have to persuade yourself that what you feel is valid. The issue with this is the point at which you do that, you begin to drive away any sentiment of truth and you wind up lying.
Your sentiments are what manage you, so when you come clean about yourself you additionally start to let your emotions control you. You can't come clean with individuals, except if you come clean with them about you. Your feelings should be in charge so you can't permit yourself to be influenced by others. At the point when you don't permit yourself to be influenced by others you aren't coming clean about yourself.
Everybody is extraordinary and you have to realize that. A few people imagine that they need to continue doing things since they don't like themselves. You realize that a few people like to lie since they have to get what they need. They have to drive their sentiments of blame for another person's heart and cause them to accept that they are harming them or causing them to feel terrible.
On the off chance that you don't come clean about yourself you can't inform it concerning others. You need to make the wisest decision for you.
Some of the time you feel terrible on the grounds that you don't care for something and that drives you mad. In the event that you don't care for an individual you should follow up on it immediately and come clean. On the off chance that you are attempting to get another line of work, it is significant that you state that you don't care for it. This way you will have the option to dodge any difficulty and assist yourself with maintaining a strategic distance from any negative contemplations.
In the event that you don't come clean about yourself, you can't educate it regarding others. You can't come clean with individuals, in the event that you don't come clean about yourself. You have to get your feelings leveled out before you come clean.
When you have authority over your feelings, you can come clean about yourself without anybody thinking about it. Individuals realize that they can get some information about what is irritating you without it being realized that you didn't generally mean anything. By utilizing your feelings and your emotions you can come clean with individuals about yourself and how you feel.
When you figure out how to control your feelings and utilize your sentiments, you will have the option to come clean about yourself and individuals will start to pay attention to you more. You will find that you are better ready to meet individuals and get what you deeply desire. You will be more joyful and your connections will improve.
On the Fringe Lies One's Self
Inspired by Ezra Pound (1885-1972)'s quote, "I guess the definition of a lunatic is a man surrounded by them". The titled responsion is...
Is the plurality of one is a null statement? Thrown-ness is a Heideggerian term. Truncated to individuation the pathology resembles a deviance of sorts. The individual archetype is different under an ancient Greek hegemony. How so? This is your task, your assignment to explore and disseminate.
I guess the definition of a lunatic is a man surrounded by them. I guess it could also be used to describe anyone who is mentally unstable or out of control. It would make sense that someone that is a lunatic would be prone to violence and mayhem. I am not sure why someone who has violent tendencies is labeled a lunatic.
Lumbersexuals are a different breed of lunatic. They are those people who are often labeled as "knuckleheads." They are in my opinion, knuckleheads because they are usually funny and sometimes have a bit of a sense of humor. These are people who may be able to pull it together for a short time, but they are not going to last very long and most people do not like people who cannot hold it together long term. Some folks even hate to be around these guys because they just do not seem very mature.
The first step in being labeled a lunatic is to know what the term means. This means understanding the word and its origins and then defining it according to its real meaning. To do this, you need to look at a few definitions of the word.
If you want to be a lunatic, you must be a crazy person. Of course, in our society that would mean you are considered crazy. However, you should not go around saying that you are crazy because that is not how most people think. They know when you are just being yourself and not trying to impress someone else.
To be labeled as a lunatic, you must have mental instability. That is to say, you should be so mentally unstable that no one can tell if you are acting for any reason or not. The definition of insanity can get a little murky, so let me try to explain it here. According to Webster's New World College Dictionary: "insanity - extreme emotional disturbance; mental instability."
People that are insane have some kind of emotional disturbance that causes them to act in strange and possibly dangerous ways. The definition of mental instability is that you have to go far outside the norm in your behavior for you to be considered crazy. that way. When you are labeled with this mental disturbance, you may be seen as being more dangerous or crazy than the next person because you are out of your normal behavior range.
I guess the definition of a lunatic is a man surrounded by them. If you are going to label someone with this mental disturbance, you can count on them to have a few eccentric traits that will be noticed. These traits will include extreme mood swings, extreme behaviors, and having a mental instability that does not allow them to control their environment. There may be physical manifestations as well.
It is my contention that a person that is labeled as a lunatic is just a guy with a lot of oddball behavior that is not considered rational. They might be a knucklehead who is willing to take chances and act on their whims.
Now let us assume that I am wrong about the definition of a lunatic, which is unlikely. You have a guy who acts out of impulse, but is considered normal. You could label him as crazy, but the chances are he is not crazy enough to put him in prison.
Therefore, the definition of a lunatic is simply a man surrounded by other crazy guys. That is to say, they are the guys that are out of control and do things they may not be comfortable with.
So, what does this all mean for you if you are labeled a lunatic? Well, if you are labeled as such, you have to be aware of the fact that you are in a group of guys with a lot of different interests.
This group may want to party and have sex and eat junk food and all kinds of other things that go beyond your normal interests. It might even include some guys that may not like your personality at all, so you are not in control of your own life.
The Nullity of No One
Inspired by Samuel Beckett (1906-1989)'s quote, "Nothing happens. Nobody comes, nobody goes. It’s awful. The titled responsion is...
Samuel Beckett was born in 1916 in Dublin and studied at Trinity College, Oxford. In the summer of 1946 he was active in the British Resistance and lived in Paris during the second world war. During the second world war he was a member of the Theatre Workshop for the Arts. During the 1950's, he began writing poetry. His poetry, however was not accepted by the famous Poetry Association of Great Britain. He wrote mainly in English and, like many of his contemporaries, he found it difficult to find an audience.
After the war Samuel Beckett moved back to England where he made his first full-length play, Nothing Happens. This play was not well received and he did not perform it in his own theater. He returned to the US and made another play, which was also less successful, The End of the Affair. After these early successes Beckett had the good fortune to meet his future publisher, Graham Greene, who encouraged him to write and produced a series of plays which were highly acclaimed in their day. One of these plays, It Happened One Night, was Beckett's last and finest piece and was considered a masterpiece by many people, including Greene.
There is little doubt that Samuel Beckett changed the face of modern drama and gave it a very distinct personality and style. His plays were often very short, but still packed a huge punch and were very often incredibly clever. Beckett frequently used a highly unusual setting, especially in his last play, It Happened One Night, which was set in a Paris suburb and was a great success with both critics and audiences. As his popularity grew, he began to experiment with various different ways of staging his plays. For example, he often changed the set to a location far away from the action in order to make the play seem more realistic and also to enhance the effect of his language. As he progressed and became more well known, he also used more dramatic and experimental methods of communication, such as a large audience participation in his performances.